4x7800GT in SLI

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,163
819
126
I didn't see this one coming for awhile. Not much yet but they have a few benchmarks here. FEAR gets pummeled by these cards. Other results are not as impressive.
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
:shocked: .. lol external power supplies they must milk some serious power, and whats with the dual VGA holes on the GFX card back plate :confused: .. air holes right ;)

The heat sink looks quality as well.
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
weeee here asus goes again.... these cards are like the bugatti veyron, the result of an exercise to prove it can be done. what was that one before than had 4 seperate cards.....dayum!.

"The map does not get itself the river over the PC power pack, a separate current supply externally at the screen is attached" great translation lol!
 

CP5670

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
5,660
762
126
Awesome. FEAR actually gets doubled performance with this setup even over one of those monster cards.

"Two ugly stripping from the mouth hang the thick Stromfressern"

:laugh:
 

ddogg

Golden Member
May 4, 2005
1,864
361
136
Wonder what happened to that quad GTX system that was spotted on HKPEC.
 

mwmorph

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2004
8,877
1
81
79.6 extra watts from each power adapter, 77watts for each pci-e slot. holy ******. much be limited though. quake 4 performancei s slower than 2x7800gtx. 3dmark05 isnt all that impressive either.
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
Yea, the sli bridge would definitely help.. they probably couldnt get it to work for some reason. 3DMark05 score looks hideous =/ approx. 11000-12000. The 512's are around 14000?
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
This is the kind of stuff I like to see companies come out with. Not because I'll buy it new, but because at some point down the road it will be priced within the realm of the middle classes, and then it will be fun to try.
 

Goi

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
6,771
7
91
So does that mean that FEAR is mostly GPU bound while Quake4 is gonna be CPU bound with the next gen ultra high end cards? A pity they didn't test it with more games
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,163
819
126
Originally posted by: TecHNooB
Yea, the sli bridge would definitely help.. they probably couldnt get it to work for some reason. 3DMark05 score looks hideous =/ approx. 11000-12000. The 512's are around 14000?

A pair of 512MB 7800GTX's score about 13,300 with an FX-57. If it's not software related, I'll bet the low scores in 3DMark05 are because of cpu overhead from SLI. Get someone with a phase-change cooled FX-57 to run those cards and I'll bet the score would go up a ton. I know I gained 3000 points going from 2.0GHz to 2.9GHz with only a pair of 7800GTs.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
wow back to the days of the 3dfx voodoo 5 6000 series with the external psu and all lol
 

Wentelteefje

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2005
1,380
0
0
Anyone of you guys knows this one...? Pre-overclocked to 700/1600MHz... It doesn't look as impressive as those two-GT's-in-one, but it needs its own external 80W PSU too... :p

EDIT: "Stromfressern" means literally "power eaters", so it's an indication on how much power these actually need...
 

RampantAndroid

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2004
6,591
3
81
My goodness...I didn't know if the Asus card would work in SLI...it does! And looks one heck of a lot more gracefull at it than Gigabyte's dual 6800GT does!

I wouldn't mind the external powerbrick.

How long until dual core GPUs I wonder?
 

Goi

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
6,771
7
91
I don't think dual core lends itself that well to GPU architecture since graphics processing is almost infinitely parallel anyway, so GPUs can just have as many rendering pipelines as they can cram into the chip and still have them scale extremely well. There's no point in dual core if you can put it in a single core.