400mph RC Jet: video inside

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

coxmaster

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2007
3,017
3
81
Weight does not affect drag, it affects acceleration. Aerodynamics affect drag.

More weight means you need more lift to fly. Right?

Generating more lift means you are generating more induced drag..

To me, it seems that weight does in fact affect drag.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Hmmm. That's a good point. Hey, I'm a car guy.. leave me alone. :p

But wouldn't that still be "aerodynamics" and not weight?

If you put a model airplane that weighed one pound into a wind tunnel and measured drag at 0.10Cd, then added ten pounds of weight inside the fuselage, wouldn't the drag be the same?

Reading the Wiki on drag, it appears that I'm neglecting the whole flight thing. Yeah, carry on.. It's totally different for a car vs. an airplane. :p Interesting.
 

coxmaster

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2007
3,017
3
81
Hmmm. That's a good point. Hey, I'm a car guy.. leave me alone. :p

But wouldn't that still be "aerodynamics" and not weight?

If you put a model airplane that weighed one pound into a wind tunnel and measured drag at 0.10Cd, then added ten pounds of weight inside the fuselage, wouldn't the drag be the same?

Reading the Wiki on drag, it appears that I'm neglecting the whole flight thing. Yeah, carry on.. It's totally different for a car vs. an airplane. :p Interesting.

Heh, thats why aerodynamics is such a complex thing. Everything is inter-related. If you change one thing, you are going to change everything in regard to the aircraft. Simply moving the weight can add/subtract drag even.

And I'm car guy too :p I just happen to be studying this stuff in school
 
Last edited:

SamurAchzar

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2006
2,422
3
76
Weight does affect drag, but there's no direct correlation, because many other factors come into play, such as optimization of the airframe for specific conditions. In other words, the lift generated by this model at top speed is probably high enough that you can make it weight twice is much and still fly just fine at that speed. It'll be a bitch to land, maybe, but for that you have flaps, variable wing geometries, etc.

So no, weight does not directly affect top speed.
 

AeroEngy

Senior member
Mar 16, 2006
356
0
0
Weight does affect drag, but there's no direct correlation, because many other factors come into play, such as optimization of the airframe for specific conditions. In other words, the lift generated by this model at top speed is probably high enough that you can make it weight twice is much and still fly just fine at that speed. It'll be a bitch to land, maybe, but for that you have flaps, variable wing geometries, etc.

So no, weight does not directly affect top speed.

Again that is not entirely true. If you added any weight to that specific airplane it would not go as fast during level flight. Because the wings would have to generate more lift. They would do this by being at a higher angle of attack wrt to airflow. The higher angle of attack generates the higher lift levels required to support the extra weight. The higher angle of attack also introduces more aerodynamic drag.

Drag is a function of the amount of lift in a given airfoil + overall plane geometry. The amount of lift required is a function of the weight of the plane. Therefore drag is proportional to weight.

I would agree with you completely if this were a car. But in an airplane the extra force to keep the plane in the air (from increased weight) has to come from somewhere. In a car this doesn't matter because it is resting on the ground and just slows down acceleration.
 

SamurAchzar

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2006
2,422
3
76
Again that is not entirely true. If you added any weight to that specific airplane it would not go as fast during level flight. Because the wings would have to generate more lift. They would do this by being at a higher angle of attack wrt to airflow. The higher angle of attack generates the higher lift levels required to support the extra weight. The higher angle of attack also introduces more aerodynamic drag.

Yes I didn't think of the AoA required. Obviously at these speeds the AoA will be marginal, but cause lots of drag. Still, a difference. My point is that unlike acceleration, you can't correlate weight to airspeed without knowing the other parameters.

I would agree with you completely if this were a car. But in an airplane the extra force to keep the plane in the air (from increased weight) has to come from somewhere. In a car this doesn't matter because it is resting on the ground and just slows down acceleration.

It's probably true for cars as well, but to a lesser degree. The weight distorts the tires contact patch, increasing the rolling resistance... Oh well, you learn something new everyday :)

What about my question about turbine output compared to airspeed? You have any idea?
 

AeroEngy

Senior member
Mar 16, 2006
356
0
0
Aren't the turbine blades "stalling" at some speed? I guess a turbine has two propulsion components, one is the accelerated airflow (like a prop) but the other is the expansion of the gases due to heat. I'd figure both are dependent on the surrounding airspeed.


Not really. I am not a jet turbine expert but propulsion effeciency in jet engines actually increases with speed. See Pic.
jeteff.jpg

I think (reaching back > 10 years to turbine class) this is because the first set of blades in a turbine are to compress the incoming air. If the airspeed is high then they do not require as much work. As the air enters the turbine it is slowed and the pressure increases naturally instead of mechanically.

Interestingly enough a jet turbine can stall but for exactly the opposite reasons. If you are at high speed and perform a maneuver at high AoA the airflow can separate from the turbine inlet and cause the turbine to stall because the air speed is no longer fast enough. This results in a rapid reduction in output force and possible a flame out.
 
Last edited:

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
I live right next to MCAS Miramar base (Marine Corp Air Services; was once the Navy base where the Top Gun program/class was and where the Top Gun movie was filmed). It's amazing how similar that thing sounds to real fighter jets which are constantly maneuvering overhead.
 

rcpratt

Lifer
Jul 2, 2009
10,433
110
116
Wtf, that is ridiculous. I was kind of hoping that he would accidentally lose control and fly it into his chest, to be honest.