Olias' original post included the Socket-370 P3-Coppermine, which was introduced in October 1999. A level comparison would then include the Slot A Athlon (last model release in March 2000) and the K6-2/K6-3 (last model release in June 2000). If you're going to admonish Intel for two processors that have outlived their usefulness (Coppermine (Socket-370 and Slot-1) and Socket-423 P4), you may as well include outdated AMD processors that existed during the same time frame.The K6 and the Athlon classic Slot A CPU's arent being made anymore, infact they havent been in production for some time!
Wow, you have shown me the light. Those who say this is a tired old argument are wrong. I'm sure the reason behind this strategy has nothing to do with the fact that AMD is a smaller company and can't support the infrastructure for multiple socket platforms. I bet it's actually because AMD is an altruistic charity whose goal is to help out the common man's struggle.AMD only have one universal socket through all their CPU range, unlike INTEL!!
How good of you to present your argument in a well-thought manner without resorting to insults or derogatory remarks (and with spelling and grammar that is above reproach).What are you an idiot?...Oh btw...*uck you
In case you missed the dripping sarcasm in my post, here's a smiley for you.
On a more serious note, for those who stuck up for me, thanks.