Originally posted by: Regs
I don't quite figure 2003 3D Mark to be completely GPU limited.
Old Rig: 2500 Barton 2.2 Ghz, KT333 4x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz 2003 Mark scored around 2500-3000.
New Rig: A64 2.2 Ghz, K8T800 8x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz with a score more than double. 6100.
I don't know why my Barton/KT333 was such a bottle neck.
Originally posted by: SneakyStuff
Originally posted by: Regs
I don't quite figure 2003 3D Mark to be completely GPU limited.
Old Rig: 2500 Barton 2.2 Ghz, KT333 4x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz 2003 Mark scored around 2500-3000.
New Rig: A64 2.2 Ghz, K8T800 8x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz with a score more than double. 6100.
I don't know why my Barton/KT333 was such a bottle neck.
The FSB of an Athlon 64 is most likely your answer, that along with faster RAM I assume.
Originally posted by: Regs
I don't quite figure 2003 3D Mark to be completely GPU limited.
Old Rig: 2500 Barton 2.2 Ghz, KT333 4x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz 2003 Mark scored around 2500-3000.
New Rig: A64 2.2 Ghz, K8T800 8x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz with a score more than double. 6100.
I don't know why my Barton/KT333 was such a bottle neck.
Originally posted by: Regs
I don't quite figure 2003 3D Mark to be completely GPU limited.
Old Rig: 2500 Barton 2.2 Ghz, KT333 4x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz 2003 Mark scored around 2500-3000.
New Rig: A64 2.2 Ghz, K8T800 8x AGP, 9800 415/620 Mhz with a score more than double. 6100.
I don't know why my Barton/KT333 was such a bottle neck.
Originally posted by: mato7742
hmm, with my barton and my overclocked 9800 pro i got 6232 as my 3dMark03 score. is that nice?
Originally posted by: SirDude
Originally posted by: mato7742
hmm, with my barton and my overclocked 9800 pro i got 6232 as my 3dMark03 score. is that nice?
I would take that score, if ya' get my drift.![]()
Originally posted by: Dufrane
I finally got 3d mark03 on my machine and scored 1535. Is that a good score for my machine?? I have a barton 2500 (stock) with 512 of pc2700 ram running in dual channel and a geforce4 ti4400 at stock speeds.
