• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

3 years now since sandy hook.

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
just please dont get weird and start dumping private messages on me. I will never fuck you no matter how hard you try.
 
The position of Sandy Hook being a hoax, was not mine. It was from a professor at a university. Read the link I left. I was making fun of him, not agreeing. But again your bias blinded you. Always looking for an insult and argument.

Stop with the constant talks about sex with me, it's getting old. You're just making yourself look silly.
 
Certainly didnt look like you wernt agreeing with him "things that make you go hmmm" Could mean you now ponder if it was a false flag? If you thought that was ridiculous then you should of either put a smiley on it or been more communicative.

And stop following me around like a puppy and I'll stop rejecting your sexual advances.
 
The position of Sandy Hook being a hoax, was not mine. It was from a professor at a university. Read the link I left. I was making fun of him, not agreeing. But again your bias blinded you. Always looking for an insult and argument.

Stop with the constant talks about sex with me, it's getting old. You're just making yourself look silly.

I have to say it seemed like you were agreeing with him to me too, but I'm glad you aren't!
 
hey cukmed,

Your new forum job is to find and pull out every nut job about every topic and post it with a hmmm?

And then please finish it with a link like this

text.

enjoy.
 
I have to say it seemed like you were agreeing with him to me too, but I'm glad you aren't!

No, of course not. Sarcasm is lost in text sometimes.

edit, going back and re-reading it I can see how it could be taken as you did. I could have worded that better than I did. I thought the "..." was apparent but I guess not. Whoops.

hey cukmed,

Your new forum job is to find and pull out every nut job about every topic and post it with a hmmm?

And then please finish it with a link like this

text.

enjoy.

My post was on topic, showing the idiocy of some people about this subject. I was making fun of a professor for teaching this and losing his job. You come out swinging like normal and just name call and attack me. Which is again normal for you.

You really should try to look at things unbiased every now and again. I wasn't posting towards you, was actually making fun of this schmuck, and you go off like normal. I'm not going to go on and on about this, last post on this. You took things the wrong way, and instead of being "my bad" you continue to just throw out insults. Pretty sad imo.
 
Last edited:
uh. Actually akcmed, everyone took your post the wrong way. Learn how to be a better poster and this wont be a problem for you. And dont pm me please.
 
What about every other metric of crime?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11362013/Violent-crime-surges-16-in-new-figures.html

Use of knives in crime continued to rise in offences such as rape (with knife-point incidents up 18 per cent), sexual assault (up 37 per cent) and threats to kill (up 23 per cent), while the overall figure of knife-point crimes was down two per cent, mainly due to a 14 per cent decline in robberies involving a blade.

To summarize, robberies are down, but other forms of violence are up. Sexual assault up 37%. What the hell.

"The Crime Survey for England and Wales continues to show steady declines in violent crime over the last 20 years
. Between the 1995 and the 2013/14 surveys, the number of violent crime incidents has fallen from 3.8 million in 1995 to 1.3 million in 2013/14.

  • Violent crime victimisation rates have fallen by more than half since peak levels of crime in the mid-1990s. In 1995 4.8% of adults aged 16 and over were a victim of violent crime in the previous year, compared with 1.8% in the 2013/14 survey.
  • Homicide has also shown a general downward trend since 2002/03. The number of currently recorded homicides for 2013/14 (526) and 2011/12 (528) were the lowest since 1989 (521). The number of homicides in 2013/14 was equivalent to 9.2 offences per million population.
  • As in previous years, children under one year old had the highest rate of homicide (23.9 offences per million population) compared with other age groups. With the exception of those aged under one year, adults generally had higher incidence rates of being a victim of homicide than children.
  • The numbers of sexual offences (64,205) in 2013/14 was the highest recorded by the police since 2002/03. As well as improvements in recording, this is thought to reflect a greater willingness of victims to come forward to report such crimes.
  • The CSEW has not seen a rise in the prevalence of sexual assault. The latest estimates show a small fall in sexual assault victimisation rates compared with the previous year.
  • In 2013/14, there were 7,709 offences in which firearms were involved, a 5% decrease compared with 2012/13. Offences involving knives or sharp instruments fell by 2% between 2012/13 and 2013/14 (to 25,972). These falls follow reductions seen in a number of previous years.
  • The profile of victims of violent crime and sexual violence varied according to the type of offence. The CSEW showed that young men were most likely to be the victims of violence, while in contrast young women were more likely to have experienced sexual assault (including attempts).
  • Women were also more likely to be a victim of domestic abuse, with 8.5% of women and 4.5% of men having experienced domestic abuse in the last year, equivalent to an estimated 1.4 million female victims and 700,000 male victims.
  • In 2013/14, as in previous years, around two-thirds of homicide victims (65%) were male. In contrast, victims killed by a partner or ex-partner were more likely to be women.
  • Victims perceived the offender(s) to be under the influence of alcohol in 53% of violent incidents. This is equivalent to an estimated 704,000 ‘alcohol-related’ violent incidents. While the volume of violent incidents that were ‘alcohol-related’ has fallen over time the proportion has remained relatively steady over the last ten years. Alcohol was a particularly prevalent factor in violent incidents between strangers, 64% of which were perceived to be alcohol-related."

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/crime...crime-and-sexual-offences--2013-14/index.html
 
The position of Sandy Hook being a hoax, was not mine. It was from a professor at a university. Read the link I left. I was making fun of him, not agreeing. But again your bias blinded you. Always looking for an insult and argument.

Stop with the constant talks about sex with me, it's getting old. You're just making yourself look silly.

Those Sandy Hook false flag stories piss me off. Those people were practically my neighbors, so I know that the story is real.
 
Easily, OKC bombing was worse in every quantifiable way.

Playing devils advocate,the ATF weren't exactly innocents and kids were essentially human shields like if some foreign dictator were putting kids creches inside military targets.

The main similarity between the incidents was the media exploiting dead kids.
 
Playing devils advocate,the ATF weren't exactly innocents and kids were essentially human shields like if some foreign dictator were putting kids creches inside military targets.

The main similarity between the incidents was the media exploiting dead kids.

Eight posts in, and it's already 100% clear you're an idiot.
 
Back
Top