3 year old child raped twice live on internet

[Indolent]

Originally posted by: ThePresence
What about boiling people in oil? Boy those were the days weren't they? You get the oil going real good, you know, a nice high rolling boil. And then slowly, at the end of a rope, you lower the perpatrator headfirst into the boiling oil. Huh? You talk about fun sh|t! And just to encourage citizen participation, you let the mob in the stadium control the speed of the rope. Good, clean, wholesome family entertainment. The kids'll love it. The kids'll love it. And at the same time they're enjoying themselves, we're teaching then a nice, moral lesson. Boiling people in oil. Sponsor: Crisco! And maybe, maybe instead of boiling all these guys every now and then you could french-fry a couple of them, you know. French-fried felons. Dip a guy in egg batter, just for a goof, you know? Kind of a Tempura thing, huh? Jeffrey Dahmer never thought of this sh|t did he?! Jeffrey Dahmer, eat you heart out!! Which is an interesting thought, in and of itself!

I realize this is a joke, but...


putting him in feet first would be more painful...

 

[meltdown75]

i hate seeing the title of this post in the 1st page. :frown:

 

[Rock Hydra]

Just another reason why I hate people.

 

[eakers]

that poor little girl.
i wonder how she was related or whatever to him?

edited for clairification.

 

[classy]

Its not too often this happens to me, but I am speechless, unbelieveable

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: Indolent

Originally posted by: ThePresence
What about boiling people in oil? Boy those were the days weren't they? You get the oil going real good, you know, a nice high rolling boil. And then slowly, at the end of a rope, you lower the perpatrator headfirst into the boiling oil. Huh? You talk about fun sh|t! And just to encourage citizen participation, you let the mob in the stadium control the speed of the rope. Good, clean, wholesome family entertainment. The kids'll love it. The kids'll love it. And at the same time they're enjoying themselves, we're teaching then a nice, moral lesson. Boiling people in oil. Sponsor: Crisco! And maybe, maybe instead of boiling all these guys every now and then you could french-fry a couple of them, you know. French-fried felons. Dip a guy in egg batter, just for a goof, you know? Kind of a Tempura thing, huh? Jeffrey Dahmer never thought of this sh|t did he?! Jeffrey Dahmer, eat you heart out!! Which is an interesting thought, in and of itself!

I realize this is a joke, but...
putting him in feet first would be more painful...

Yes, but it's loads more fun to lower him down when he's upside down.

 

[aolj]

Wow! That guy should be shot dead. Whatever it is he shouldn't be alive.

"Unfortunately, we can't seek the death penalty," Deters said. "This kind of Internet stuff (is) the kind of stuff you'd expect to see in southeast Asia, but it happened in Hamilton County, Ohio," he said."

WTF??? southeast Asia?? That's a load of bullcrap.

 

[aidanjm]

so who was he broadcasting the rape to? the secret service guy?

"Police said last week an undercover Secret Service agent met Kraft in an online chat room called pre-teen, baby and toddler sex. According to the agent, Kraft offered to rape a 3-year-old live on the Internet if another person would do the same so Kraft could watch. The undercover agent contacted Hamilton County sheriff's deputies, who went to Kraft's home, questioned and arrested him."

 

[intogamer]

:shocked:

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: aidanjm
so who was he broadcasting the rape to? the secret service guy?

"Police said last week an undercover Secret Service agent met Kraft in an online chat room called pre-teen, baby and toddler sex. According to the agent, Kraft offered to rape a 3-year-old live on the Internet if another person would do the same so Kraft could watch. The undercover agent contacted Hamilton County sheriff's deputies, who went to Kraft's home, questioned and arrested him."

Is it now the Secret Service's job to stop child porn?
Seems from the story that he never actually did it, just spoke about doing it. Correct?

 

[TerryMathews]

Originally posted by: Indolent

Originally posted by: ThePresence
What about boiling people in oil? Boy those were the days weren't they? You get the oil going real good, you know, a nice high rolling boil. And then slowly, at the end of a rope, you lower the perpatrator headfirst into the boiling oil. Huh? You talk about fun sh|t! And just to encourage citizen participation, you let the mob in the stadium control the speed of the rope. Good, clean, wholesome family entertainment. The kids'll love it. The kids'll love it. And at the same time they're enjoying themselves, we're teaching then a nice, moral lesson. Boiling people in oil. Sponsor: Crisco! And maybe, maybe instead of boiling all these guys every now and then you could french-fry a couple of them, you know. French-fried felons. Dip a guy in egg batter, just for a goof, you know? Kind of a Tempura thing, huh? Jeffrey Dahmer never thought of this sh|t did he?! Jeffrey Dahmer, eat you heart out!! Which is an interesting thought, in and of itself!

I realize this is a joke, but...


putting him in feet first would be more painful...

Was thinking that myself. Ideally, you'd want it hot enough that the oil cauterized the wound as it went, so that you could burn this guys body off one horizontal section at a time.

Yeah, I think removing one body part at a time while still alive is a fitting way for a "person" like this to die. About the only good thing in this situation is that at three years old, she might not remember this when she grows up. God help her if she does though, it must have felt brutal. Aside from the emotional trauma, anatomically her small body wouldn't be prepared for that unless this guy was Needledick. It'd be like having a penis forced into your nose, if your nose had 100x the nerve endings in it.

 

[TerryMathews]

Originally posted by: ThePresence
Seems from the story that he never actually did it, just spoke about doing it. Correct?

Read more carefully. Second paragraph says he raped her five times, and twice were broadcast over the internet.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Locut0s

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Locut0s
This isn't the first case of a toddler/baby being raped. WTF is it with people who rape babies? I mean I think paedophiles are the worst scum imaginable but at least I can wrap my mind around how a 20 year old guy could be attracted to a 16 year old girl. But WTF is going on in cases like these?

A 20 yo guy who is sexually attracted to 16 yo girls is not a paedophile. A guy who gets off on raping babies and toddlers, however, is.

Well by the dictionary definition of paedophilia he actually is:

"
http://www.answers.com/pedophile&r=67

An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.
"
Legally 16 usually constitutes a child. Of course when you consider the number of 16 year olds who insist on dressing like 30 year olds, by that definition almost every guy is guilty of being a paedophile.

Legally, in most cases 16 year olds are considered children. This is a cultural convention that has not existed throughout history. However, in terms of a sexual fetish/perversion or even basic biology, pedophiles are attracted to children who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics.

A legal child != a biological child.

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: TerryMathews

Originally posted by: ThePresence
Seems from the story that he never actually did it, just spoke about doing it. Correct?

Read more carefully. Second paragraph says he raped her five times, and twice were broadcast over the internet.

I'm going by this:

"Police said last week an undercover Secret Service agent met Kraft in an online chat room called pre-teen, baby and toddler sex. According to the agent, Kraft offered to rape a 3-year-old live on the Internet if another person would do the same so Kraft could watch. The undercover agent contacted Hamilton County sheriff's deputies, who went to Kraft's home, questioned and arrested him."

 

[chowmein]

southeast asia! WTF! OUTRAGED

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: ThePresence

Originally posted by: vi_edit

I don't think they're devoid of a sense of right and wrong, they just don't give a shite. I think every person on earth recognizes the wrong in this.

In cases like this...there is some SERIOUS mental malfunctioning. That part of your brain that chirps up and says "HEY! THIS IS FSCKED UP!!!!" just doesn't kick in with these people.

They have no remorse and no regrets. And they keep doing it until they are put away or put to death.

Perhaps, I'm not a psychanalyst. Just seems to me that everyone has to recognize the wrong in it. Do you think serial killers don't recognize the wrong in what they do? I would think that they do, they just don't care. Perhaps I'm wrong.

Be sure to let us know okay?

 

[TerryMathews]

Originally posted by: ThePresence

Originally posted by: TerryMathews

Originally posted by: ThePresence
Seems from the story that he never actually did it, just spoke about doing it. Correct?

Read more carefully. Second paragraph says he raped her five times, and twice were broadcast over the internet.

I'm going by this:

"Police said last week an undercover Secret Service agent met Kraft in an online chat room called pre-teen, baby and toddler sex. According to the agent, Kraft offered to rape a 3-year-old live on the Internet if another person would do the same so Kraft could watch. The undercover agent contacted Hamilton County sheriff's deputies, who went to Kraft's home, questioned and arrested him."

And I'm going by this:

Investigators said Paul A. Kraft, 31, raped a 3-year-old girl at least five times and broadcast the rape live on the Internet at least twice, News 5 Emily Longnecker reported.

Second paragraph, like I said. News channels, and prosecutors, don't typically engage in slander of this magnitude.

 

[kalster]

Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said he wishes he could give Kraft the death penalty. Unfortunately, we can't seek the death penalty," Deters said. "This kind of Internet stuff (is) the kind of stuff you'd expect to see in southeast Asia, but it happened in Hamilton County, Ohio," he said.

wtf, prosecute this redneck retard along with the guy as well

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: HamSupLo
send him to Iraq with a sign around his neck stating: America rules! Fvck yeah! Take that bitches!

Fixed.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: vi_edit

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Thank you. I'm in an ongoing debate with some treehugger b!tch about the death penalty and in fact life in prison. She thinks that EVERYONE can be rehabilitated. I've been presenting her with progressively more heinous crimes, and this should break her.

Pedofiles have the highest rates of recidivism of almost any other criminals out there. It's a disease, that doesn't have a cure.

So, they should be put to death then.

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: TerryMathews

Originally posted by: ThePresence

Originally posted by: TerryMathews

Originally posted by: ThePresence
Seems from the story that he never actually did it, just spoke about doing it. Correct?

Read more carefully. Second paragraph says he raped her five times, and twice were broadcast over the internet.

I'm going by this:

"Police said last week an undercover Secret Service agent met Kraft in an online chat room called pre-teen, baby and toddler sex. According to the agent, Kraft offered to rape a 3-year-old live on the Internet if another person would do the same so Kraft could watch. The undercover agent contacted Hamilton County sheriff's deputies, who went to Kraft's home, questioned and arrested him."

And I'm going by this:

Investigators said Paul A. Kraft, 31, raped a 3-year-old girl at least five times and broadcast the rape live on the Internet at least twice, News 5 Emily Longnecker reported.

Second paragraph, like I said. News channels, and prosecutors, don't typically engage in slander of this magnitude.

Okay, you win.

 

[BW86]

What a sicko.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: kalster

Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said he wishes he could give Kraft the death penalty. Unfortunately, we can't seek the death penalty," Deters said. "This kind of Internet stuff (is) the kind of stuff you'd expect to see in southeast Asia, but it happened in Hamilton County, Ohio," he said.

wtf, prosecute this redneck retard along with the guy as well

Oh, they don't sell children in Southeast Asia? It's not as though what he said isn't accurate.

 

[TerryMathews]

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: kalster

Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said he wishes he could give Kraft the death penalty. Unfortunately, we can't seek the death penalty," Deters said. "This kind of Internet stuff (is) the kind of stuff you'd expect to see in southeast Asia, but it happened in Hamilton County, Ohio," he said.

wtf, prosecute this redneck retard along with the guy as well

Oh, they don't sell children in Southeast Asia? It's not as though what he said isn't accurate.

I was going to make a comment along these lines and decided not to. The sex trade in that area is without equal, but the prosecutor's comment was still out of line. I don't think raping three year old children is accepted anywhere in the world. Now if she were 10... GAME ON! </joking>

 

[Locut0s]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Locut0s

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Locut0s
This isn't the first case of a toddler/baby being raped. WTF is it with people who rape babies? I mean I think paedophiles are the worst scum imaginable but at least I can wrap my mind around how a 20 year old guy could be attracted to a 16 year old girl. But WTF is going on in cases like these?

A 20 yo guy who is sexually attracted to 16 yo girls is not a paedophile. A guy who gets off on raping babies and toddlers, however, is.

Well by the dictionary definition of paedophilia he actually is:

"
http://www.answers.com/pedophile&r=67

An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.
"
Legally 16 usually constitutes a child. Of course when you consider the number of 16 year olds who insist on dressing like 30 year olds, by that definition almost every guy is guilty of being a paedophile.

Legally, in most cases 16 year olds are considered children. This is a cultural convention that has not existed throughout history. However, in terms of a sexual fetish/perversion or even basic biology, pedophiles are attracted to children who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics.

A legal child != a biological child.

True.