• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2800vrs3000

R

rammstein junkie

Senior member
i was wondering if i would be better off to save my self some $$ and get the 2800 but i think that would complicate overclocking (the 10x multiplier is so much nicer) but all in all would they pretty much yield the same results when overclocking?
 
They are about the same. You just pay a bit extra for the bump in multiplier and mhz for the 3000+ performance is prty much the same.
 
yeah, the 2800+ 64 seems to be able to achieve the same overclocking speeds as an overclocked 3000+...around 2.4Ghz in most cases, there are exceptions in the OC world, of course. So that said....2800+ is a good deal. I'd say in a non-OCing perspective...the 3000+ is the best bang for the buck cuz you get a crucial 200 Mhz more, but for OCing the 2800+ is the best bang for the buck.
 
I think the more you can pay, the better, as OC'ing is not only NOY guaranteed, but quite often fails badly. See me other thread to understand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top