28 weeks later

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
B

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
Well ACTUALLY Spiderman 2 sucked balls, I was watching it with a bunch of friends and everyone though it was a cheezy load of cr@p. IF you said Godfather 2 then maybe you would make more sense.
 
H

HiTek21

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2002
4,391
1
0
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: ForumMaster
actually, doesn't look that good. infact, looks kind of crappy. sequels almost always are.
Click to expand...

Except Terminator 2 and Spiderman 2
Click to expand...

don't forget to include Aliens
 
A

andy9o

Senior member
May 27, 2005
494
2
0
But, Terminator 2 was so.... campy. Lot of one liners. They tried to make it another happy-go-lucky action film, which the first one wasn't at all. In Terminator 2 its all "Bad to the Bone" etc... Whereas in Terminator 1 its OMFG AN UNSTOPPABLE ROBOT FROM THE FUTURE IS TRYING TO KILL ME! THAT IS SCARY, BUT IN NO WAY FUNNY! AHHHHHHH!

Aliens 2 was great though. Because it wasn't campy.
 
S

Slick5150

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 2001
8,760
3
81
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
It has nothing to do with 28 Days Later, just a cheap run on the brand for money.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? Its a direct sequel (they are repopulating the country after the outbreak from the 1st movie), and its produced by Danny Boyle who created the first one.

Early reviews over at aintitcool.com have been wildly enthusiastic.

 
MrDudeMan

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: BrownTown
Well ACTUALLY Spiderman 2 sucked balls, I was watching it with a bunch of friends and everyone though it was a cheezy load of cr@p. IF you said Godfather 2 then maybe you would make more sense.
Click to expand...

LOTR.
 
W

wyvrn

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
10,074
0
0
Going to see the 11:20 am showing today. Gawdam this is gonna be great! Who's with me?
 
destrekor

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
It has nothing to do with 28 Days Later, just a cheap run on the brand for money.
Click to expand...

really? not the whole fact that the city has been closed since the story ended in the first movie, and they think they have all of the virus contained, but apparently they do not? sounds like a continuation to me.
 
K

ksaajasto

Senior member
Nov 29, 2006
212
0
0

Updated: 11:24 a.m. EDT (15:24 GMT), May 11, 2007

Review: '28 Weeks Later' thrillingly effective
"28 Days Later," a zombie movie on speed, pictured the United Kingdom as a desolate wasteland just a month after a virus entered the general population. "28 Weeks Later" ups the ante, and does so quite effectively.

FULL STORY


? EW review: Disappointing 'Georgia Rule'

? Weekend movie preview



found on cnn.com
KS
 
W

wyvrn

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
10,074
0
0
Ok I thought it was really well done. There was suspense from start to finish. I was not comfortable in my chair at all. There were some slow parts but I think that makes the movie better because they used it to build the characters. The plot was somewhat predictable but no boring. There was some very intense bursts of action, and some great shots of London. I don't know how they managed to make the city deserted all the time from the aerial shots unless they used computers. I didn't like the ending for various reasons (no spoilers). But the quality was good and worth the ticket.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom