• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

28 weeks later

Well ACTUALLY Spiderman 2 sucked balls, I was watching it with a bunch of friends and everyone though it was a cheezy load of cr@p. IF you said Godfather 2 then maybe you would make more sense.
 
But, Terminator 2 was so.... campy. Lot of one liners. They tried to make it another happy-go-lucky action film, which the first one wasn't at all. In Terminator 2 its all "Bad to the Bone" etc... Whereas in Terminator 1 its OMFG AN UNSTOPPABLE ROBOT FROM THE FUTURE IS TRYING TO KILL ME! THAT IS SCARY, BUT IN NO WAY FUNNY! AHHHHHHH!

Aliens 2 was great though. Because it wasn't campy.
 
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
It has nothing to do with 28 Days Later, just a cheap run on the brand for money.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? Its a direct sequel (they are repopulating the country after the outbreak from the 1st movie), and its produced by Danny Boyle who created the first one.

Early reviews over at aintitcool.com have been wildly enthusiastic.

 
Originally posted by: BrownTown
Well ACTUALLY Spiderman 2 sucked balls, I was watching it with a bunch of friends and everyone though it was a cheezy load of cr@p. IF you said Godfather 2 then maybe you would make more sense.
Click to expand...

LOTR.
 
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
It has nothing to do with 28 Days Later, just a cheap run on the brand for money.
Click to expand...

really? not the whole fact that the city has been closed since the story ended in the first movie, and they think they have all of the virus contained, but apparently they do not? sounds like a continuation to me.
 

Updated: 11:24 a.m. EDT (15:24 GMT), May 11, 2007

Review: '28 Weeks Later' thrillingly effective
"28 Days Later," a zombie movie on speed, pictured the United Kingdom as a desolate wasteland just a month after a virus entered the general population. "28 Weeks Later" ups the ante, and does so quite effectively.

FULL STORY


? EW review: Disappointing 'Georgia Rule'

? Weekend movie preview



found on cnn.com
KS
 
Ok I thought it was really well done. There was suspense from start to finish. I was not comfortable in my chair at all. There were some slow parts but I think that makes the movie better because they used it to build the characters. The plot was somewhat predictable but no boring. There was some very intense bursts of action, and some great shots of London. I don't know how they managed to make the city deserted all the time from the aerial shots unless they used computers. I didn't like the ending for various reasons (no spoilers). But the quality was good and worth the ticket.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top