2700k or 8350

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
2700k By a HUGE Land Slide

Would be like comparing a i7 950 to a 2700k Clock for clock.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/287?vs=697

3.4ghz vs 4ghz.. From following 8350 thread on OCN Most people are only getting the 8350 to 4.8ghz Stable So 800 more mhz OC head room

i7 2700k Are well known to go 4.8ghz - 5.1ghz so lets say 1400 more Mhz of performance or 4.8ghz ghz...
 
Last edited:

Termie

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
7,949
48
91
www.techbuyersguru.com
You thinking about continuing your experimentation with AMD processors? ;)

I'd say the 8350 is pretty competitive with the 2500K in some benchmarks, but those are the ones where hyperthreading allows the 2700k to pull away.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
Microcenter has the 2700k on sale for $229 so it is very close to the price of the 8350. Obviously, the 3770k is newer and faster but is $289. Just thought about changing out one of the 2500k rigs to 2700k vs "upgrading" the 8150 to 8350.
 

Termie

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
7,949
48
91
www.techbuyersguru.com
Microcenter has the 2700k on sale for $229 so it is very close to the price of the 8350. Obviously, the 3770k is newer and faster but is $289. Just thought about changing out one of the 2500k rigs to 2700k vs "upgrading" the 8150 to 8350.

Actually the 3770k is $270 now I think. Because you don't have z77, it's probably not worth it. PCIe 3.0 is the biggest advantage. Overall mostly a sidegrade with either chip, so only do it for fun (if that's what we call hours of tinkering with our computers....)

:)
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
Alternative is to buy one of the 2560 x 1440 27" Catleap monitors. What do you think of that?
 

Durvelle27

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2012
4,102
0
0
get the FX-8350 since you already have a board and sell the FX-8150 to recoup some your money
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
146
106
I would get the screen, sicne it sounds like the biggest beneficial upgrade. But what about the last option, do nothing ;)
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
ShintaiDK, the last option you give makes the most sense but is the least fun!��
 

tweakboy

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2010
9,517
2
81
www.hammiestudios.com
2700k with 4 cores and 8 threads OCed will slap the sh*T out of amd 8 physical cores..

the processor is 199 and its their top one that tells you how desperate AMD is.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
146
106
Yep, silly me that I didnt notice. Usually US is the one with the deals and my mind didnt think more over it. Bought mine in Denmark for around 625$.

Anyway, with that said. I am sure you can call Dell in the US and still get it for 600$ or less with abit of bargaining.
 

sequoia464

Senior member
Feb 12, 2003
870
0
71
Get the monitor - I have one of the Dell 27" monitors - wish I had the 30" though. Outside of SSD's this is the best money I have ever spent, computer wise.

This monitor is great for excel.
 

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
Thanks guskline. The good news is that in the middle of the city, where I live, things will probably be ok. It's folks in the outlying areas who will have to cope with no power and flooding.

like me i live in the woods my house is surrounded on all sides by 70 foot oak trees lol.

Anywho ive bumped 1300mhz of performance..
LL
 

crazymonkeyzero

Senior member
Feb 25, 2012
363
0
0
It depends what you will primarily use the computer for.
Seems like piledriver will only exhibit performance surpassing 2700k in highly threaded tasks such as video editing/encoding. For all other tasks such as gaming, the 2700k is the clear choice.
 

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
It depends what you will primarily use the computer for.
Seems like piledriver will only exhibit performance surpassing 2700k in highly threaded tasks such as video editing/encoding. For all other tasks such as gaming, the 2700k is the clear choice.

You got it wrong brotha 2700K Has HT 4 cores 8 threads.. It will stomp a 8350 in the ground clock for clock no matter what it is.
 

ctsoth

Member
Feb 6, 2011
148
0
0
You got it wrong brotha 2700K Has HT 4 cores 8 threads.. It will stomp a 8350 in the ground clock for clock no matter what it is.

Not quite true. Not true at all actually.

Please don't start up the pilot light on the flamethrower, I'm not some AMDer, an Inteler, or any manner of fanboy. In highly threaded workloads, Vishera is faster, that said, you pay for it in power usage, just as it will probably be for Haswell vs Steamroller.

Everyone goes bonkers of peak overclock results and benchmarks, but if you are using your computer for work you shouldn't be overclocking. For serious work, stock is what matters.
 

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
Not quite true. Not true at all actually.

Please don't start up the pilot light on the flamethrower, I'm not some AMDer, an Inteler, or any manner of fanboy. In highly threaded workloads, Vishera is faster, that said, you pay for it in power usage, just as it will probably be for Haswell vs Steamroller.

Everyone goes bonkers of peak overclock results and benchmarks, but if you are using your computer for work you shouldn't be overclocking. For serious work, stock is what matters.

A 2700k clock for clock... you know that means 4.5ghz 2700k vs 4.5ghz 8350..

The 2700k Destroys it.. it is not even a Contest.

People need to quit looking at those stock benchmarks of a 4ghz 8350 vs a 3.5ghz 2700k and see it beating the 2700k in 2 things by 3 seconds... and say well it beats it in these few things well it has to be pretty good.

Wrong. This is a 2700k Unlocked Processor Which will not only Clock as High as a 8350 but on Avg 200mhz Higher then a 8350.. So Amd is no where in the Ball Park.

I am following the 8350 Club Thread on OCN reading every post And the best 24/7 OC they are getting is 4.8 Ghz and That's not many Most hit a wall at 4.5ghz and just afew higher With Massive volts running At there chips TJMAx..
 
Last edited:

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
A 2700k clock for clock... you know that means 4.5ghz 2700k vs 4.5ghz 8350..

The 2700k Destroys it.. it is not even a Contest.

I am following the 8350 Club Thread on OCN reading every post And the best 24/7 OC they are getting is 4.8 Ghz and That's not many Most hit a wall at 4.5ghz and just afew higher With Massive volts running At there chips TJMAx..


I don't think it utterly destroys it.. 2700k will beat it in a single threaded situations.



Oh and yes I see you over at OCN derailing the club thread and you need to stop it here as well. :rolleyes:





Originally Posted by Hokies83

Antec 920 pump is dead silent Cough...
Somebody shouda bought it from Somebody Cough Cough.


Originally Posted by Raven.7
Do you wanna quit harassing me because i didn't buy your product? Get off my thread if you're going to keep posting irrelevant crap.
 

ctsoth

Member
Feb 6, 2011
148
0
0
Nice to utterly ignore my point about overclocking isn't for everyone. Sorry, but the Intel chip is not better in every way imaginable. That said if I were going to buy a new processor today, it would most likely be an Ivy bridge. But I am in the market for a new processor, and I am going to wait for Haswell/Steamroller.

Quit deriding people.