Question 2023 upgrade...

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
Because of all the problems I've been having with my current PC, i7-9700K/32gb Corsair DDR4/EVGA 3070 GPU, Seasonic Focus 750 PSU, I'm looking to MAYBE upgrade later this month.

I will re-use one of my 2 cases, either an IBuyPower POS mid-tower case, or an ancient Coolermaster HAF 932 which will require new case fans and the addition of a USB 3. front panel. The Coolermaster, being a MUCH larger case will give me much more room for expansion, would allow me to use a Noctua air cooler, but if I go with an AIO, then I'm limited to a 240mm unit same as the IPB case.

So...I just added the Corsair RAM a month ago, I could go with a 12th gen Intel CPU and keep that, but if I go with a 13th gen, then I might have to buy DDR5. (but depending on the motherboard, I MIGHT have to do with a 12th gen CPU.)

Recommendations for CPU/Motherboard? I'd prefer to stay with the "flagship" model of whichever generation I get. No I5 or I7 models unless the performance is so much better than the I9 variant.

I DO NOT need storage...I have a couple of good (1TB WD Black and 2 TB Seagate) spinner HDD's, 2 240GB SSD's, a 1TB NVMe and a 2TB NVMe.

I know we have lots of AMD supporters here, but my VERY LIMITED experience with AMD/ATi has been...disappointing to say the least. (most of those were FAR from being flagship models of CPU or GPU with the exception of the X850XT PE GPU I bought some 15 years ago.) As such, I'd prefer only Intel processor recommendations.

Thanks.

EDIT: This will be used for gaming, (mostly older FPS shooters) surfing and watching videos. No video encoding, no graphics work other than games. No CAD or anything similar.

EDIT.2
Turns out, both Z690 and Z790 boards are available in DDR4 and DDR5.

Now then, I'vever built with MSI. I seem to remember that about 20 years ago they were considered bottom tier. Don't know if that's changed. I've pretty much only ever used ASUS in my builds, but have been looking at Gigabyte as well...HOWEVER, the "exploding PSU" debacle from this past year has me second guessing that.
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
So...I've been dismantling my ancient 1156 rig tonight. Most of it will probably get taken to the e-waste disposal. Sad because the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, i5-760 CPU, and Corsair DDR3-1600 (4x2GB) Are all in excellent condition. Only overclocked to play with it when it was new...always reverted back to stock.
Anyway...I want to keep my Noctua NH-U12P SE2 cooler. It's still more than good enough for quite a few CPU's, just not the i5-13600K that I bought. When I went to dismount it from the CPU...it was stuck...the TIM had hardened and was like cement. (Cleaned right off with 91% IPA) Oddly enough, temps NEVER got over about 60C...ever, so inspite of drying out, the TIM and cooler did their job...for more than 10 years.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: igor_kavinski

In2Photos

Platinum Member
Mar 21, 2007
2,018
2,049
136
So...I've been dismantling my ancient 1156 rig tonight. Most of it will probably get taken to the e-waste disposal. Sad because the ASUS P7P55D-E Pro motherboard, i5-760 CPU, and Corsair DDR3-1600 (4x2GB) Are all in excellent condition. Only overclocked to play with it when it was new...always reverted back to stock.
Anyway...I want to keep my Noctua NH-U12P SE2 cooler. It's still more than good enough for quite a few CPU's, just not the i5-13600K that I bought. When I went to dismount it from the CPU...it was stuck...the TIM had hardened and was like cement. (Cleaned right off with 91% IPA) Oddly enough, temps NEVER got over about 60C...ever, so inspite of drying out, the TIM and cooler did their job...for more than 10 years.
Same here with my i7-920 and Xigmatek Dark Knight cooler. I redid the paste a few years ago when I added more RAM, bought a GTX 1060 6GB and decided to overclock the CPU. First application of TIM lasted at least 10 years. I'm thinking about keeping most of my rig and maybe putting the parts out on display in my office for a little nostalgia.
 

Motostu

Senior member
Oct 5, 2020
551
575
136
Paste is a right-of-passage. You've never really built a computer until you have used paste.
Some of us still go the extra mile and lap the contact surface of our heat sinks! In the early days, I even lapped the processor lid to eek out that last little bit of performance. At least I don't do that anymore.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
I was dredging through some of my old Amazon orders. In December 2010, I paid $204.99 for the i5-760. 2 weeks ago, I bought the i5-13600K...paid $319.93. Not a big increase in price over the past 12 years for such a HUGE increase in performance.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
I hope no one from Intel sees your comment. Don't want them to think they are being too "generous" to us.

aad.thumb.gif
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
Hope to see your stock settings scores for Geekbench 5, Rapydmark at High and MemMaxx2!

Posted the GB and MM scores the other day. Ran Rapydmark 1.2a...everything was fine except the Cathedral 3D test. Everytime it reported test error. (even though it ran to completion) No idea what that's about.

esults of all tests:

Total time (all tests): 41.326 seconds

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Matrix multiplication
Iterations: 100M | Performance: 28,785,262 it/s (20th) | Time: 3.474 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: MulDivAddSub (int,double,int64_t)
Iterations: 100M | Performance: 34,590,108 it/s (20th) | Time: 2.891 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Trigonometric functions
Iterations: 100M | Performance: 50,607,288 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.976 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Floating point operations per second
Iterations: 4K | Performance: 2,237 it/s 577.300 GFLOPS (20th) | Time: 1.788 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Find prime numbers SQR method
Iterations: 50M | Performance: 35,561,876 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.406 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Fibonachi sequence (92)
Iterations: 1000M | Performance: 418,410,016 it/s (20th) | Time: 2.390 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Pi approximation Taylor series method
Iterations: 200 | Performance: 108 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.838 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Greatest Common Divisor (GCD) Euclid's algorithm
Iterations: 400M | Performance: 178,890,864 it/s (20th) | Time: 2.236 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Fill Memory 256 MB
Iterations: 6K | Performance: 1,949 it/s (20th) | Time: 3.078 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Copy Memory 256 MB
Iterations: 6K | Performance: 2,557 it/s (20th) | Time: 2.346 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Memory cache performance (max 4 threads)
Iterations: 10 | Performance: 11 it/s (4th) | Time: 3.541 s
Last result: SizeMem= 8 kB Iterations= 65536 Time= 2 ms
SizeMem= 16 kB Iterations= 32768 Time= 2 ms
SizeMem= 32 kB Iterations= 16384 Time= 2 ms
SizeMem= 64 kB Iterations= 8192 Time= 6 ms
SizeMem= 128 kB Iterations= 4096 Time= 6 ms
SizeMem= 256 kB Iterations= 2048 Time= 6 ms
SizeMem= 512 kB Iterations= 1024 Time= 6 ms
SizeMem= 1 MB Iterations= 512 Time= 6 ms
SizeMem= 2 MB Iterations= 256 Time= 9 ms
SizeMem= 4 MB Iterations= 128 Time= 12 ms
SizeMem= 8 MB Iterations= 64 Time= 20 ms
SizeMem= 16 MB Iterations= 32 Time= 52 ms
SizeMem= 32 MB Iterations= 16 Time= 63 ms
SizeMem= 64 MB Iterations= 8 Time= 64 ms
SizeMem= 128 MB Iterations= 4 Time= 77 ms


-------------------------------------
Test Type: Files Encrypt AES256 (10 MB)
Iterations: 2K | Performance: 1,353 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.478 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Memory Encrypt/Decrypt AES256 (1 MB)
Iterations: 400 | Performance: 461 it/s (20th) | Time: 0.866 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Memory Encrypt/Decrypt Blowfish448 (1 MB)
Iterations: 400 | Performance: 517 it/s (20th) | Time: 0.773 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Memory Compress/Decompress 1 MB (Gzip)
Iterations: 400 | Performance: 497 it/s (20th) | Time: 0.804 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Files Compress 10 MB (Gzip)
Iterations: 200 | Performance: 239 it/s (20th) | Time: 0.834 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: RSA Keys Generator (2048 bits)
Iterations: 200 | Performance: 162 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.234 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Hash SHA1/256/512 MD4/5 CRC32 RIPEMD160 (512 bytes)
Iterations: 100K | Performance: 25,354 it/s (20th) | Time: 3.944 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Random Numbers Generator (2048 bits)
Iterations: 20M | Performance: 14,771,049 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.354 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Bitcoin Address Generator
Iterations: 20K | Performance: 11,661 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.715 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Distances between points on Earth (Haversine)
Iterations: 100M | Performance: 73,529,408 it/s (20th) | Time: 1.360 s

-------------------------------------
Test Type: Cathedral 3D Test
Iterations: 1 | Performance: Test error | Time: 0

Yet the 3D test report says:

FPS average: 437 | min: 253 | max: 1237

I have no idea if any of that is bad or good.
 
Jul 27, 2020
19,958
13,680
146
Posted the GB and MM scores the other day. Ran Rapydmark 1.2a...everything was fine except the Cathedral 3D test. Everytime it reported test error. (even though it ran to completion) No idea what that's about.
Rapydmark should be run with the HIGH setting. You can select all tests and then scroll down and deselect the Cathedral test. It doesn't affect the total time taken to complete all tests.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
OK. High stress test:

aal.png


Once again, the Cathedral 3D test errored out. There was a couple of tests that pushed the CPU to 100% on all cores...and a couple of cores warmed right up...
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Jul 27, 2020
19,958
13,680
146
OK. High stress test:
I don't see your Rapydmark screenshot anymore. Don't see your Memmaxx2 screenshot either in the other thread. Dunno what's the issue. Maybe forum taking its revenge from you? :)

I'm getting roughly 38 GB/s RAM bandwidth with E-cores. With them turned off, it increases to about 39.4 GB/s.

This is with DDR5-4600 CL28-30-30-60 (it's actually an EXPO DDR5-5600 kit that I got for about $100. Can't get it to run any better with PMIC VDD/VDDQ 1.25V and CPU/IMC at 1.17/1.225V).

I seem to remember that your Rapydmark score was about 226 sec. Mine is doing about 230 to 234 sec with air cooler so I guess that's good for a 12700K gimped with slow RAM?
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
I don't see your Rapydmark screenshot anymore. Don't see your Memmaxx2 screenshot either in the other thread. Dunno what's the issue. Maybe forum taking its revenge from you? :)

I'm getting roughly 38 GB/s RAM bandwidth with E-cores. With them turned off, it increases to about 39.4 GB/s.

This is with DDR5-4600 CL28-30-30-60 (it's actually an EXPO DDR5-5600 kit that I got for about $100. Can't get it to run any better with PMIC VDD/VDDQ 1.25V and CPU/IMC at 1.17/1.225V).

I seem to remember that your Rapydmark score was about 226 sec. Mine is doing about 230 to 234 sec with air cooler so I guess that's good for a 12700K gimped with slow RAM?

I don't know what's going on with that...I noticed it last night. Maybe after I get a couple of cups of coffee in mah belly...

heh...fixed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
Thanks!

May I have your Geekbench 5 URL? I think you posted it in some other thread. Can't seem to find it.

Never had it installed. Here's the results:


https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/20207926

 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
Quick question. Just installed a second WD SN770 NVMe drive 1TB. (I now have one 2TB WD SN770 NVMe, (Disk 1, C: the boot drive) a 1TB HP EX950 NVMe, (Disk 2, F: ) ,a 2TB WD_Black HDD (Disk 0, E: ),and this one, (Disk 3, D: ).
In disk management, the disks are listed like this:
I don't care about the order...which one is Disk 1, etc...or the lettering...but WHY do I have "healthy EFI System Partition and healthy Recovery Partition" in disk 2? I don't remember that one ever being a boot disk in the previous computer. (Maybe...it does have a Windows folder...that would explain the "recovery partition, but what about the EMI System partition?) Can I delete BOTH of those partitions without killing the rest of the data on the drive?

aci.png


Maybe it's nothing...but together, it looks like they take up 600 MB. (probably inconsequential in a 1TB drive)

Looks like I have two instances of Windows 10 installed in different drives. Keep both or delete one? How best to delete one?

acj.png


acl.png
 

solidsnake1298

Senior member
Aug 7, 2009
302
168
116
View attachment 77045

Those two??? Don't. Just don't!
He said disk 2. The HP NVMe drive. Currently his F drive.

It's possible it came from the factory formatted with those partitions. The EFI partition is essential if the OS boots from that drive, which doesn't currently appear to be the case with the HP drive.

If you decide to go through with deleting those partitions to recover the 600MB, I would backup the data on the main partition before doing so. The disk management utility built into computer management may be able to delete those partitions and expand the partition your F drive currently occupies. If not, MiniTool and EaseUS have free partition managers.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
He said disk 2. The HP NVMe drive. Currently his F drive.

It's possible it came from the factory formatted with those partitions. The EFI partition is essential if the OS boots from that drive, which doesn't currently appear to be the case with the HP drive.

If you decide to go through with deleting those partitions to recover the 600MB, I would backup the data on the main partition before doing so. The disk management utility built into computer management may be able to delete those partitions and expand the partition your F drive currently occupies. If not, MiniTool and EaseUS have free partition managers.
I have a brand-spanking new drive. I can move everything I want to keep onto that drive, then just format drive 2 into a single partition.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
64,274
12,607
136
He said disk 2. The HP NVMe drive. Currently his F drive.

It's possible it came from the factory formatted with those partitions. The EFI partition is essential if the OS boots from that drive, which doesn't currently appear to be the case with the HP drive.

If you decide to go through with deleting those partitions to recover the 600MB, I would backup the data on the main partition before doing so. The disk management utility built into computer management may be able to delete those partitions and expand the partition your F drive currently occupies. If not, MiniTool and EaseUS have free partition managers.

Thanks. I moved the data I wanted to keep, formatted the drive, used mini tool to remove the partitions and create a data drive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: solidsnake1298