Ford C-Max has the turning radius of a semi.
Uh, no. It has a very tight turning circle.
Ford C-Max has the turning radius of a semi.
Well, I guess if you consider the ES350 to have a "very tight" turning circle then yes the C-Max has a very tight turning circle of 38 feet.Uh, no. It has a very tight turning circle.
Well, I guess if you consider the ES350 to have a "very tight" turning circle then yes the C-Max has a very tight turning circle of 38 feet.
I don't know where you got the idea the C-Max has a small turning radius when it's one of the most common complaints about it.
Uh, no. It has a very tight turning circle.
Have you driven a C-Max? I test drove one 30 minutes before I bought a Prius and the thing couldn't make a u-turn to a normal size 2-lane road. Every single person who drives one complains about the turning radius.
The Honda Accord is 2ft longer...Uh, I own one and drive it everyday. I'm pretty happy with the turn radius and handling.
It is no worse than my old Honda Accord and it is better than my old Subaru Outback.
The Honda Accord is 2ft longer...
I've literally never seen anyone complain about the turn radius of this car. Or make such a big deal out of it.
Uh, I own one and drive it everyday. I'm pretty happy with the turn radius and handling.
It is no worse than my old Honda Accord and it is better than my old Subaru Outback.
I'm suspicious of posted turning radii. Google reports the Mini Cooper at 17.7 to 18.1, more than my Prius which can't be correct.. When I test drove a Mini I thought it was the most fun to drive since a go-kart and did a complete 360 turn in two lanes,
What you notice first about driving the Mini is that its electrohydraulic speed-sensitive steering is heavy. It's also very quick. You don't often find those traits in the same bed. It'll cause you to hit apexes too early for the first few days, and a strong sneeze on the freeway can land you in a new lane. Tracking is otherwise good for a car with a 97.1-inch wheelbase. Not so the turning circle, which exceeds a Honda CR-V's. As if to match the steering, the clutch and shift linkages are also relatively high-effort devices. The accelerator pedal is adequately positioned for heel-and-toeing, but it emits a nasty metal-to-metal clack every time it meets the fire wall.
On the list of my auto purchase priorities the turning circle is near the bottom. I don't think I have ever gone on a test drive and thought to myself "damn this car couldn't turn around in a football field".
As mentioned earlier, Toyota claims a range of 35 kilometres, which seems like a gross miscalculation. Either that, or the company wanted to be conservative, because we easily travelled 49.6 kilometres in EV mode. Had my driving partner and I known the road better and exploited the various modes more effectively, we likely could have covered 56 kilometres before depleting the battery.
Thanks for the perfect explanation of the go-kart feel.car and driver googling says...
I'm also surprised.
Back to the Prime, it seems like some reviewers are finding that Toyota understated the range of EV mode.
This one particularly stands out:
