Before the season, OKC was widely projected to be a better team than the Rockets. So let's dispel this results-based notion that OKC is a crappy team dragged to the playoffs by RW's singular brilliance. He had a phenomenal regular season but if the voting was anything like the last 25 years, James Harden is the "real MVP." I'm not saying Harden is better and by many accounts, RW will win the award in June. Would've been cooler to see him win the award last week as his team gets dusted off.He's not clueless, he can't rely on anybody else on his team. He literally can't depend reliably on anyone else on his team. It's why he should be automatic MVP. OKC would be a horrible team without him.
And let's also dispense with the new notion that RW is a 4th quarter assassin, unless that means killing his own team's chances of winning. You can't really use the fatigue excuse if you start jacking up shots thinking you're Steph Curry but you're not.
I won't disagree that RW has the heaviest burden in the NBA. But as Kobe discovered at points in his career, your teammates don't get better over a season if you don't help them improve. And that's especially the case if you're a point guard.
So yes, he's a tremendous top 10 player and one on one is a mini version of Michael Jordan. But the brilliance was good for 47 regular season wins and just 1 playoff win. It would've been a 6 game series if not for him torpedoing two 4th quarters in close games. I'm taking a lot of guys over RW if I'm building a team from scratch.
The Rockets were 7 games better than OKC in the regular season, and I'm not sure if that's solely attributable to Mike D'Antoni. Even if it is, give his team credit for functioning as a more cohesive unit than the Thunder.
Last edited:
