Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I wonder what acceleration times will be with 4 adults in it...
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Who's the fanboy raving redlines? 8K is relevant to the Sedan discussion regarding previous Civic Sedan models; but no one's discussing it as a deciding factor. HP and torque aren't being ignored by any means. They are apparently more important than other factors to you thoughOriginally posted by: 91TTZ
Why do fanboys care about what the redline is while ignoring the important ifgures like horsepower and torque?
"yeah dog it only has 78 hp but it revs to 9,000 rpm!!!!1".
A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.
Originally posted by: UNCjigga
BOO, they should've done a hatch or a 5-door. When does the new CRX come out?
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Who's the fanboy raving redlines? 8K is relevant to the Sedan discussion regarding previous Civic Sedan models; but no one's discussing it as a deciding factor. HP and torque aren't being ignored by any means. They are apparently more important than other factors to you thoughOriginally posted by: 91TTZ
Why do fanboys care about what the redline is while ignoring the important ifgures like horsepower and torque?
"yeah dog it only has 78 hp but it revs to 9,000 rpm!!!!1".
A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.
Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.
Uhm yeah, lots of discussion going on here about ricer raving redlines... BTW, a vid clip of a Dyno test is linked in the OP. If that's "loud as hell" then spank me and call me Sally. Seriously, got anything other than latent fanboy angst to grind? No one's ricing out the thread.Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.Originally posted by: BD2003
A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.
Well, it is a package/performance version of the stock vehicle; not a different vehicle in itelf. At least the changes don't look like just a bunch of bolt on parts.Originally posted by: Aztech
Yeah, that just looks too much like the regular civics.
Originally posted by: Aharami
139 ft/lbs. Honda still cant find torque. But they did an awesome job with the dash and instrumentation panel - waaay better than any similarly priced american cars
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Uhm yeah, lots of discussion going on here about ricer raving redlines... BTW, a vid clip of a Dyno test is linked in the OP. If that's "loud as hell" then spank me and call me Sally. Seriously, got anything other than latent fanboy angst to grind? No one's ricing out the thread.Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.Originally posted by: BD2003
A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
regardless of actual power figures, i've driven the Si hard and when the tach swings north of 6K, the hair will stand up on the back of your neck from the sound and sudden rush as the cams switch over. it's a very fun car. that said, the lack of headroom, the drone of the engine at cruise, and the meth-addict feel make me prefer the refined thrust of Accord V6 6-speed.
BTW, the Si is more fun to drive than the WRX, which has more power and AWD. the MS3 has more power still but looses the AWD. my guess is that unless the MS3 handles REALLY well and feels REALLY good, the Si would be as much fun.
No argument there. But then, those desiring the benefits of increased displacement usually aren't putting a magnifying glass on economy cars.Originally posted by: BD2003
At the same time, having a small, high revving, high compression ratio engine is great for economy, but as far as performance and pure enjoyment goes, there's no replacement for displacement.
Originally posted by: OS
Honda needs to stop dicking around and shut up the crybabies. They should slap TSX 2.4s in civics, complete with fat ass cams, a nicer equal length header and a factory ported head like the ITR.
I'd say you have info worth noting there Don. Here's a link from automobilemag.com that describes a comparison between powerbands through rpm range for the Volkswagen GTI, Honda Civic Si(coupe) and Mazdaspeed 3:Originally posted by: DonVito
Someone please feel free to correct me, but I believe the only reason Honda engines appear to have little torque is the very high redlines VTEC allows. Since peak torque has a constant relationship to HP at 5500 RPM, an engine that revs to 8K will always have what appears to be low peak torque relative to peak RPM. The same thing is true of the very high-revving Ferrari and BMW engines (e.g., a Ferrari 360 has 400 bhp but only 275 lb-ft of torque, and an M5 500 bhp and 383 lb-ft), but nobody bitches so much about it because the raw torque numbers are still acceptable due to larger engine displacement.
Punch the accelerator at 3000 rpm in a Mazdaspeed 3 and you'll probably smile, too. But if you compare it to the more sophisticated engines of the other cars here, you may find it lacking the linearity and broad-range power delivery that set apart the merely powerful engines from the truly magnificent.
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
I'm 6' 4" and fit okay in the front of a Civic coupe or sedan. Back in a Civic coupe isn't bad once you're in there. However the back of a sedan is even worse for headroom, as the sedan isn't much larger than the Coupe.Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Regs
I wouldn't want to sit in the back seat of any coup. I'm 6'1 and I barly fit in the front seat of my Accord.
i bet you'd be just peachy in the back of a bentley continental GT
