2007 Honda Civic Si Sedan

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,715
10,471
136
BOO, they should've done a hatch or a 5-door. When does the new CRX come out?
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I wonder what acceleration times will be with 4 adults in it...

Obviously terrible, but that is no different from any other car.

I've ridden in an evolution with 4 male adults and particularly on the freeway it didn't pull worth sh*t.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Why do fanboys care about what the redline is while ignoring the important ifgures like horsepower and torque?

"yeah dog it only has 78 hp but it revs to 9,000 rpm!!!!1"
Who's the fanboy raving redlines? 8K is relevant to the Sedan discussion regarding previous Civic Sedan models; but no one's discussing it as a deciding factor. HP and torque aren't being ignored by any means. They are apparently more important than other factors to you though ;).

A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.

Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.
 

RedArmy

Platinum Member
Mar 1, 2005
2,648
0
0
Originally posted by: UNCjigga
BOO, they should've done a hatch or a 5-door. When does the new CRX come out?

Is there really a new CRX in the works? I haven't heard anything about it but I did see some concept pictures a while ago. That would be badass to have both an old CRX and a new CRX. (I personally think the old CRX rocks it hardcore though)...but I'm bias.
 

RedArmy

Platinum Member
Mar 1, 2005
2,648
0
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Why do fanboys care about what the redline is while ignoring the important ifgures like horsepower and torque?

"yeah dog it only has 78 hp but it revs to 9,000 rpm!!!!1"
Who's the fanboy raving redlines? 8K is relevant to the Sedan discussion regarding previous Civic Sedan models; but no one's discussing it as a deciding factor. HP and torque aren't being ignored by any means. They are apparently more important than other factors to you though ;).

A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.

Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.

It's great for track racing (e.g. Elise, F1 cars etc). I wouldn't really call it crap since at some point or another it does serve a purpose. I do know where you're coming from though but some small 4 cylinders can only make the power at that RPM, its just how it's designed.
 

Dr. Detroit

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2004
8,649
1,022
126
Civic Si has a pretty soft suspension. Car & Driver road tested the SI and found a lot of body roll.

The Cobalt SS flys! Went around the track faster than the Mustang GT. The Cobalt was a full 5 seconds faster than the Si, 4 seconds faster tha n GTI and 1/2 a second faster than the Mustang GT.

 

dotcom173

Senior member
Jan 16, 2006
580
0
0
the sedan Si is gonna be sick, just as sick as the new coupe Si's......im in love with them, i just need some money
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
Honda needs to stop dicking around and shut up the crybabies. They should slap TSX 2.4s in civics, complete with fat ass cams, a nicer equal length header and a factory ported head like the ITR.
 

Sketcher

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2001
2,237
0
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: BD2003
A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.
Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.
Uhm yeah, lots of discussion going on here about ricer raving redlines... BTW, a vid clip of a Dyno test is linked in the OP. If that's "loud as hell" then spank me and call me Sally. Seriously, got anything other than latent fanboy angst to grind? No one's ricing out the thread.

 

Sketcher

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2001
2,237
0
0
Originally posted by: Aztech
Yeah, that just looks too much like the regular civics.
Well, it is a package/performance version of the stock vehicle; not a different vehicle in itelf. At least the changes don't look like just a bunch of bolt on parts.

I actually like the look of the new Civic Sedan in stock trim. A little primp here and there and I think they did a good job with the Si styling. I don't know about the wing though. If I order one this spring I'll likely see if I can order without it.
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
139 ft/lbs. Honda still cant find torque. But they did an awesome job with the dash and instrumentation panel - waaay better than any similarly priced american cars
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Aharami
139 ft/lbs. Honda still cant find torque. But they did an awesome job with the dash and instrumentation panel - waaay better than any similarly priced american cars

Someone please feel free to correct me, but I believe the only reason Honda engines appear to have little torque is the very high redlines VTEC allows. Since peak torque has a constant relationship to HP at 5500 RPM, an engine that revs to 8K will always have what appears to be low peak torque relative to peak RPM. The same thing is true of the very high-revving Ferrari and BMW engines (e.g., a Ferrari 360 has 400 bhp but only 275 lb-ft of torque, and an M5 500 bhp and 383 lb-ft), but nobody bitches so much about it because the raw torque numbers are still acceptable due to larger engine displacement.
 

batmang

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2003
3,020
1
81
ms3 > si's by a long shot.

its got more power and way more torque, im more than sure it has better handling (thats what mazdas are known for), and its got more space. plus... the ms3 wont be on the theft list like the si's will in 2-5 years.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
regardless of actual power figures, i've driven the Si hard and when the tach swings north of 6K, the hair will stand up on the back of your neck from the sound and sudden rush as the cams switch over. it's a very fun car. that said, the lack of headroom, the drone of the engine at cruise, and the meth-addict feel make me prefer the refined thrust of Accord V6 6-speed.

BTW, the Si is more fun to drive than the WRX, which has more power and AWD. the MS3 has more power still but looses the AWD. my guess is that unless the MS3 handles REALLY well and feels REALLY good, the Si would be as much fun.
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: BD2003
A high redline = loud as hell = tuner (or perhaps, ricer) crowd loves it.
Exactly. Fanboys love that crap.
Uhm yeah, lots of discussion going on here about ricer raving redlines... BTW, a vid clip of a Dyno test is linked in the OP. If that's "loud as hell" then spank me and call me Sally. Seriously, got anything other than latent fanboy angst to grind? No one's ricing out the thread.

As far as stock street cars go, its pretty loud. I've seen enough of them tear down the street in my prescence to know this. Its not WRX Sti loud, but it's up there. Its not fart can loud, its 8000rpm cold air intake loud.

On the inside, I imagine it's even louder. My car revs to 8350. I'd rather not have to rev that high in order to get the full potential out of my engine. At the same time, having a small, high revving, high compression ratio engine is great for economy, but as far as performance and pure enjoyment goes, there's no replacement for displacement.
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
regardless of actual power figures, i've driven the Si hard and when the tach swings north of 6K, the hair will stand up on the back of your neck from the sound and sudden rush as the cams switch over. it's a very fun car. that said, the lack of headroom, the drone of the engine at cruise, and the meth-addict feel make me prefer the refined thrust of Accord V6 6-speed.

Pretty much. It's damn fun, but it's like unleashing the fury. A lot of the times, I'd just want to be able to blast off without all that ruckus.

BTW, the Si is more fun to drive than the WRX, which has more power and AWD. the MS3 has more power still but looses the AWD. my guess is that unless the MS3 handles REALLY well and feels REALLY good, the Si would be as much fun.

Probably, but I'd most likely end up pushing the MS3 harder more often, just because it'd be so effortless.
 

Sketcher

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2001
2,237
0
0
Originally posted by: BD2003
At the same time, having a small, high revving, high compression ratio engine is great for economy, but as far as performance and pure enjoyment goes, there's no replacement for displacement.
No argument there. But then, those desiring the benefits of increased displacement usually aren't putting a magnifying glass on economy cars.

 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: OS
Honda needs to stop dicking around and shut up the crybabies. They should slap TSX 2.4s in civics, complete with fat ass cams, a nicer equal length header and a factory ported head like the ITR.

Why not just go with that turbo'd 2.4 that's in the RDX?

That seems like the most logical solution to most of their problems.
 

Sketcher

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2001
2,237
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Someone please feel free to correct me, but I believe the only reason Honda engines appear to have little torque is the very high redlines VTEC allows. Since peak torque has a constant relationship to HP at 5500 RPM, an engine that revs to 8K will always have what appears to be low peak torque relative to peak RPM. The same thing is true of the very high-revving Ferrari and BMW engines (e.g., a Ferrari 360 has 400 bhp but only 275 lb-ft of torque, and an M5 500 bhp and 383 lb-ft), but nobody bitches so much about it because the raw torque numbers are still acceptable due to larger engine displacement.
I'd say you have info worth noting there Don. Here's a link from automobilemag.com that describes a comparison between powerbands through rpm range for the Volkswagen GTI, Honda Civic Si(coupe) and Mazdaspeed 3:

Mazdaspeed3 Torque
Punch the accelerator at 3000 rpm in a Mazdaspeed 3 and you'll probably smile, too. But if you compare it to the more sophisticated engines of the other cars here, you may find it lacking the linearity and broad-range power delivery that set apart the merely powerful engines from the truly magnificent.

The Truth in Numbers
2007 Volkswagen GTI, Honda Civic Si, and Mazdaspeed 3 Dyno Tests: The Truth in Numbers






 

LordMorpheus

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2002
6,871
1
0
Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Regs
I wouldn't want to sit in the back seat of any coup. I'm 6'1 and I barly fit in the front seat of my Accord.

i bet you'd be just peachy in the back of a bentley continental GT
I'm 6' 4" and fit okay in the front of a Civic coupe or sedan. Back in a Civic coupe isn't bad once you're in there. However the back of a sedan is even worse for headroom, as the sedan isn't much larger than the Coupe.

I'm taller still and I routinely ride in the back seat of things like corollas and so forth with two other people. It's definately doable.

I'm much more at home in the captain's chair of my town car, though, and the four people in the back prefer it as well.