imported_Mike
Lifer
- Dec 4, 2002
- 18,211
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: Ilmater
That's ridiculous. LT is the greatest RB of our time, no doubt. But the fact is, the Chargers have a great defense that keeps them winning games. What would they be without LT? Not as good, for sure, but still good.Originally posted by: NuAlphaMan
If LT doesn't win the MVP this year, there is some frackenacklebull going on in the NFL!!!!!
Without Brees, NO would be lucky to win a game.
I love LT, but he is not the greatest rb of our time. I believe Alexander and Johnson are both better backs.
Now if you could back your opinion up with some real facts, people might take you seriously.
You must be kidding though...surely you aren't serious.
Let me guess you started watching the NFL this year right?
LJ has equal LT's yards on the ground this year. Actually out gained him so far by 5. LJ doesn't play in a good offense like LT, LJ is the offense for KC. LJ still has scored 13 tds this year and thats without Trent Green. What makes LJ impressive is he faces 8 men in the box practically the whole game. LT doesn't. LT gets the benefit of a passing game.
As for Alexander, are you kidding me. He has seriuosly outgained LT the last 3 years straight. He was hurt this year though and last year he put up 1880 and 27 tds. A healthy Alexander is a more explosive back than LT. And by the way, another factoid, both LJ and Alexander have slightly better career yards per carry than LT. No question LT is a great back, future HOF imo. But is he the best of our day? I don't know about that one.
Alexander, healthy, I can see an arguement for. Including LJ is just ridiculous IMO. He hasn't even been doing well for 2 full seasons yet. After he has been consistantly getting it done for the better half of a decade, then we could maybe toss his name up into the discussion of all time greats.
