Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Whats so wrong about it? It looks MUCH better than the Mustang (my opinion), and offers superior performance. Heck, at least when I drive down the road I won't have to see 3 at every stoplight.
It looks just like a Grand Prix. It's a complete and utter disgrace to it's namesake.
Its similar in apperance, but thats how almost all Pontiacs are. Many brands carry there "distinctive" marks so you know its their car. Look at BMW, Mercedes, Porsche, Chevrolet, and a few others. You look at the front, and you know its that brand.
I believe the GTO is a nice looking car, inside and out. Yes, it has similar traits to other Pontiacs, but thats not always a bad thing. It just looks very clean and nice. 2005 GTO will have some hood scoops, so hopefully that'll bring a little flare to the little-too-clean design of the new GTO.
Performance is superior to the Mustang in just about every way. Aside from the 2004 Cobra's, which are rated at 390hp, the Mustang has nothing on the current GTO which pushes out 350hp, and even then, the Cobra only has it on a straight line. The GTO has superior suspension and handling to all Mustang models.
If you want to go foward a year, GM has announced that the 2005 GTO will be using the LS2 which is used in the next generation Corvette, which generates 400hp. More than the previous generation's Cobra, and more than the top of the line next generation GT.
If I like the styling of the GTO over the Mustang, and the performance is better, if the price difference doesn't bother me, why shouldn't I get the GTO over the Mustang?