HamburgerBoy
Lifer
- Apr 12, 2004
- 27,112
- 318
- 126
I lost a sound card to one. It happens.
But yeah, thanks for douching up the thread.
lol, Californian?
I lost a sound card to one. It happens.
But yeah, thanks for douching up the thread.
Run it off a thumb drive
I'm not even sure how to do that. It may not allow me to select USB as the boot, not sure. How slow would it be? I only have a 1 gb thumb drive hanging around, anyway.
Thumb drives are one of those things where if you need one right away, the only option is Best Buy and they'll charge you 20 bucks for something that cost 10 bucks on sale 5 years ago.
I can appreciate that. I built my "good" computer in 2006, but sometimes too old is too old. I could see some niche uses where running a 486 makes sense, but for most people, the extra benefits of security, compatibility, and speed make getting a new(er) machine a good investment.
So for most folks that surf the web, only reason for upgrade is really "just for shits and giggles" In most cases the gain is minimal AT BEST.
:biggrin:
Here is a little secret. (keep in mind that person in the OP is a bit over the top to apply this perhaps, but as long as it works for them/whatever floats that boat).
Hardware upgrade has reached it's peak 5-8 years back. Only thing that's helping it right now is development which is coded to force people to upgrade (especially in gaming). From OS to specific programs, they all demand newer hardware.
Let's face it, MOST things people do don't need lot of horsepower. Entire hardware progress past 5-10 years hasn't really been all that great at all AND there is only SO much people need to do their bits.
When it comes to specialized sectors (let's take gaming), truth is, graphics have not improved that much AT ALL. Yet each new game requires more horsepower than the one before that. Look at COD for example, why is it that the engine is the same/game looks almost the same....but you need better hardware?
Compare the hardware specs of a video card from 3 years ago and today. We are talking 3-4x better specs. Do the games look 4x better? Does your computer run 4x faster/better?
Can basic users surf the web or do Office that much faster?
We are talking worthless milliseconds. Wow we are at 5ghz speeds? Impressive, but what has that REALLY gained you specifically?
It's called "we have run out of steam so let's have devs make things more demanding so people could buy new hardware".
So for most folks that surf the web, only reason for upgrade is really "just for shits and giggles" In most cases the gain is minimal AT BEST.
For advanced users, they got you on the lockdown.
: D
But us PC Gamers/hardware buffs can always make ourselves happy just by looking at the console people.
:biggrin:
I just replaced a cmos battery on a Canon computer with a 486 DX-66 cpu running Windows 3.1.
It has to be 20 years old.
The woman uses it every day as a word processor.
That's got to be a record. I don't think I have even worked on a Windows 98 computer for at least 5 years.
Security through obscurity!
Betcha win98 is now one of the more secure OSes to put on the internet since nothing runs on it
You'll be doing a GNU/Linux distro, but it's simple as long as your machine USB boots, and anything made in the last 10 years should USB boot. 1gb is plenty. Things that access the disk will be a little pokey, but it isn't that bad, especially if you have a good drive. Puppy loads into ram, so you don't have to deal with the disk. You could also use one of the ultralights; DSL TinyCore, or Slitaz. All of those give you gui desktop, and the images are less than 100mb, some are far less. They aren't the prettiest, and they require a bit more general tech knowledge than something like Puppy or Ubuntu, but you don't have to to be an uber hacker or anything.
Anyway, give it a try. If you want a web surfer/email/light office machine, try Puppy. It's fast, light, and looks decent. It also will fit on your drive.
http://www.puppylinux.com/
And you confirmed it, how?
I'm running a 1.7 GHz at home, and it is terrible. But with a slimmer OS, I'll bet the 486 feels pretty snappy, and with no new software or upgrades it won't slow down over time. She's probably very happy.
I have been planning a new computer for over a year now. Prices have not dropped very much lately.
My last 486 (an HP) was retired last summer. Its power supply stopped working when room temperatures exceeded 95 degrees F (35C). Was not worth finding and replacing its defective power system part. A failure probably traceable to a manufacturing defect.I know a guy who lives on his 486 laptop. He's a fiction writer. Amazing.
I work for a property management company and when we buy a place like an apartment complex we generally inherit the existing employees. This one place we bought had an old lady working in the leasing office. She did her documenting on a type writer. It took over 10 minutes for her to understand what the start button is (Good thing we aren't moving to Windows 8 lol).
Umm... Perhaps you didn't notice, but it says right on the front that it is "Quiet".I still have this Panasonic KX-P2123 in storage.
My first colored 24-pin dot-matrix. Those were noisy printer. I wonder if they have drivers for Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7.
I just replaced a cmos battery on a Canon computer with a 486 DX-66 cpu running Windows 3.1.
It has to be 20 years old.
The woman uses it every day as a word processor.
That's got to be a record. I don't think I have even worked on a Windows 98 computer for at least 5 years.