$2 lunch - now with pic!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

darkewaffle

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2005
8,152
1
81
If you're just eating a mcdouble or whopper jr. and getting some decent stuff the rest of the day, it's not really all that bad. At one point in my life I was getting burger king almost everyday but still was able to lose weight.

Some professor lost weight with a diet that consisted of 2/3 twinkies/snack cakes/etc. Losing weight is stricly calories in vs calories out, it's not a real reflection of health.

Admittedly the prof actually became numerically healthier on some fronts, but I think that was more a result of the decrease in raw calorie intake rather than the source of the calories.
 

vshah

Lifer
Sep 20, 2003
19,003
24
81
damn, lunch is usually $9-$13 for me :(

i must start packing it from home.
 

chalmers

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2008
2,565
1
76
Some professor lost weight with a diet that consisted of 2/3 twinkies/snack cakes/etc. Losing weight is stricly calories in vs calories out, it's not a real reflection of health.

Admittedly the prof actually became numerically healthier on some fronts, but I think that was more a result of the decrease in raw calorie intake rather than the source of the calories.

If all he was eating was truly little debbie stuff, I'd imagine the numerically unhealthier fronts outweighed the healthier ones, heh.
 
Oct 20, 2005
10,978
44
91
If you spend more than $2 for lunch you are doing it wrong. Forget these high prices at fast food places. I order a double cheeseburger and value fries at Micky Dees and only pay two bucks.

Whereas at Wendys that same order would be $8
. :mad:

esplain.
 

slag

Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
10,473
81
101
On Monday I made a massive pot of lentil soup that supplied me with a dinner and four lunches this week, plus another eight lunches worth of soup that I threw in the freezer. Beat THAT for both cost value and nutrition.

Might as well just go throw up in a jar and eat that. Lentil soup is shit and eating the same thing 4x a week is just pathetic.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
Some professor lost weight with a diet that consisted of 2/3 twinkies/snack cakes/etc. Losing weight is stricly calories in vs calories out, it's not a real reflection of health.

Admittedly the prof actually became numerically healthier on some fronts, but I think that was more a result of the decrease in raw calorie intake rather than the source of the calories.

Yea, I won't say it's the healthiest thing you can eat. Just that a little bit of it a day isn't absolutely terrible for you either.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
If all he was eating was truly little debbie stuff, I'd imagine the numerically unhealthier fronts outweighed the healthier ones, heh.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html
But you might expect other indicators of health would have suffered. Not so.
Haub's "bad" cholesterol, or LDL, dropped 20 percent and his "good" cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent. He reduced the level of triglycerides, which are a form of fat, by 39 percent.
"That's where the head scratching comes," Haub said. "What does that mean? Does that mean I'm healthier? Or does it mean how we define health from a biology standpoint, that we're missing something?"
 

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
If you spend more than $2 for lunch you are doing it wrong. Forget these high prices at fast food places. I order a double cheeseburger and value fries at Micky Dees and only pay two bucks.

Whereas at Wendys that same order would be $8. :mad:

You are doing it wrong at Wendy's, they have a dollar menu too.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Some professor lost weight with a diet that consisted of 2/3 twinkies/snack cakes/etc. Losing weight is stricly calories in vs calories out, it's not a real reflection of health.

Admittedly the prof actually became numerically healthier on some fronts, but I think that was more a result of the decrease in raw calorie intake rather than the source of the calories.

There is no single study where any participant has lost the amount weight of weight predicted by the calorie deficit. Why? Its quite simple the human body is not a closed system like a bomb calorimeter and therefore the calories in < calories out will never hold true. Every weight loss study based on calories in < calories out eventually plateaus! why? There is a mechanism when the brain thinks its starving it will store any calories beyond the bare minimum to fat.

Obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation, not overeating, and not sedentary behavior.
 
Last edited:

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
A disease which never existed 50 years ago. Humans evolve quickly these days :hmm:

50 years ago I don't think we were consuming processed carbs in such extravagant dosages. They put corn syrup and sugar in frozen vegetables for Christ sakes wtf do you need sugar in vegetables for?
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,070
2,702
126
IMG_1656.JPG
 

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
Mind = blown.

You realize dollar menus have been around for years at most fast food restaurants, right?

People abused the nuggets though, they cost more than $1 now :-(
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
1.50 hotdog and drink from costco is still the best value... wish there was one near my work

Costco-menu+hotdog.jpg

I wish there was one closer to my work :( There's one place I go to, 6 bucks for a pastrami and beer. Eat half a sandwich and have the beer for lunch, eat the other half for dinner.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
In Manhattan its the $1.69 menu. Sometimes there is a dollar menu but its not as plentiful as other places.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
It's so they don't taste like penis. Nobody likes vegetables.

i like vegetables... most, some are ass

i'm about to go spend 6.99 on enough Burmese food to feed me for 3 meals.
 
Last edited: