2/20/2009

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
One additional point is investors are playing by worse "house rules" each year. The house: brokers, ibanks, CEOs etc always got a cut of your investment in the past - but today it's insane and they are sure to get all the excess profits first. I don't see this changing.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: Zebo
Still overvalued like all stocks are. Whole thing has been about a 50 year pyramid scheme.
A pyramid or Ponzi scheme relies on new members to pay off long term members. The stock market relies on (a) new members and (b) company profits in order to pay off long term members. There is a similarity there, but there is also a major difference. The rise in stock prices is basically a pyrmaid scheme. But the dividends are not. Dividends historically were quite decent (approaching 5%). While that isn't the 10% that people expected from stocks (since that included an additional 5% pyramid scheme profit), it is a decent return. Too bad dividends were slashed in the internet boom and all we are left with is scraps and the pyramid scheme.

This is what bugs me about the stock market. Dividends are things of the past. The only reason to buy stock now is to sell it some sucker later who hopes he can pawn it off on someone else for more than he paid, and the cycle continues.
Well they still have them, but generally, especially for high-priced stocks, represents a pretty marginal value in the actual stock.

 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,042
4,688
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
This is what bugs me about the stock market. Dividends are things of the past. The only reason to buy stock now is to sell it some sucker later who hopes he can pawn it off on someone else for more than he paid, and the cycle continues.
But, there is a silver lining. There are only a finite number of large companies and a roughly-fixed finite number of shares of their stock. Yet, the population keeps growing. Assuming that every person on average will want some level of that stock, the demand for the stock will grow with the population in the long term. Roughly fixed supply with increase in growth of demand means the price must go up with population in the long term. In your words, there are more and more suckers born who want those stocks. Unloading them isn't going to be much of a problem long term.

Similar arguments can be said with inflation. The revenues and profits will go up approximately with inflation (hopefully more so that dividends can go up as well). Thus, for inflation reasons, the stock price should go up (even if in real terms there wasn't much change).

Both the population argument and the inflation argument will lead to long-term exponential growth in stock prices. The growth rate is slow, but it is still there. So lets look at an exponential graph that I made a couple months back. <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/dullard/DJIA_History_Oct2008.jpg">
Here it is.</a> Using a historical growths in population and inflation, the stock market has gone up nearly linearly on that exponential graph. What does it say about today? The stock market is under-priced.

I'm willing to play in a pyramid scheme. As long as you aren't among the last ones in, you are good. I've got my yearly $5000 IRA money just itching to get 100% into stocks. My trigger point has been S&P at 750, but I'm wondering if I should hit 750 on the way down, or hit just below 750 on its way up. I don't like catching falling knives. So, I'm leaning towards the latter - let it go below 750 and buy it when it finally shows some gains (as long as I don't hit April 15, 2009, I'm happy waiting).
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|
Yikes, has the red chaffing on your behind healed up yet?

I have ridden this most of the way down. I didn't know enough about it to get out of equities initially, despite early last year feeling that its drop would continue. I ultimately moved in a good chunk out of equities when the DOW was at 10k and a smaller bit much more recently. Otherwise I'll wait and see what happens. This recession and bear market is not a garden variety, but still if it rebounds to any meaningful degree I'd rather not miss out on all of that, especially after taking the beating.

14k, however, was fantasy. This bear market is more a correction than brainless pessimism. The P/E ratios are much more realistic now. 14k was bullsh*t. I will pay more attention next time.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: BoberFett
This is what bugs me about the stock market. Dividends are things of the past. The only reason to buy stock now is to sell it some sucker later who hopes he can pawn it off on someone else for more than he paid, and the cycle continues.
But, there is a silver lining. There are only a finite number of large companies and a roughly-fixed finite number of shares of their stock. Yet, the population keeps growing. Assuming that every person on average will want some level of that stock, the demand for the stock will grow with the population in the long term. Roughly fixed supply with increase in growth of demand means the price must go up with population in the long term. In your words, there are more and more suckers born who want those stocks. Unloading them isn't going to be much of a problem long term.

Similar arguments can be said with inflation. The revenues and profits will go up approximately with inflation (hopefully more so that dividends can go up as well). Thus, for inflation reasons, the stock price should go up (even if in real terms there wasn't much change).

Both the population argument and the inflation argument will lead to long-term exponential growth in stock prices. The growth rate is slow, but it is still there. So lets look at an exponential graph that I made a couple months back. <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/dullard/DJIA_History_Oct2008.jpg">
Here it is.</a> Using a historical growths in population and inflation, the stock market has gone up nearly linearly on that exponential graph. What does it say about today? The stock market is under-priced.

I'm willing to play in a pyramid scheme. As long as you aren't among the last ones in, you are good. I've got my yearly $5000 IRA money just itching to get 100% into stocks. My trigger point has been S&P at 750, but I'm wondering if I should hit 750 on the way down, or hit just below 750 on its way up. I don't like catching falling knives. So, I'm leaning towards the latter - let it go below 750 and buy it when it finally shows some gains (as long as I don't hit April 15, 2009, I'm happy waiting).

Problem with that is all baby boomers and supporting their dead beat children will make a run on the market soon, when allowed w/o penalty. Then I'll get in.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

No bond funds?
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|
Yikes, has the red chaffing on your behind healed up yet?

I have ridden this most of the way down. I didn't know enough about it to get out of equities initially, despite early last year feeling that its drop would continue. I ultimately moved in a good chunk out of equities when the DOW was at 10k and a smaller bit much more recently. Otherwise I'll wait and see what happens. This recession and bear market is not a garden variety, but still if it rebounds to any meaningful degree I'd rather not miss out on all of that, especially after taking the beating.

14k, however, was fantasy. This bear market is more a correction than brainless pessimism. The P/E ratios are much more realistic now. 14k was bullsh*t. I will pay more attention next time.

More like open sores with puss. Seriously I has a so called 'generous plan' too with up to 10% match and it's way lower than what I put in alone, not to mention employer contribution. Obviously this hedge is gone. I'm sitting on a two legged stool at the moment.

Who knows though, you listen to guys like Legend and I'll get all that back multi-fold. It's not a loss until you sell, right?:roll:
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

No bond funds?

Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,042
4,688
126
Originally posted by: Zebo
Problem with that is all baby boomers and supporting their dead beat children will make a run on the market soon, when allowed w/o penalty. Then I'll get in.
I've made that argument myself. But someone here claimed (without proof) that the baby boomers actually have a negligible amount of money in the stock market. I never looked it up, so to me the answer is left unclear. Maybe we should look that up. Do they have enough in the stock market to make another significant dent?

 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: Zebo
Problem with that is all baby boomers and supporting their dead beat children will make a run on the market soon, when allowed w/o penalty. Then I'll get in.
I've made that argument myself. But someone here claimed (without proof) that the baby boomers actually have a negligible amount of money in the stock market. I never looked it up, so to me the answer is left unclear. Maybe we should look that up. Do they have enough in the stock market to make another significant dent?

If that's true then I'm wrong - but as you say lets get some evidence. Also, there is still the issue of the investor class finally waking up to the lack of real dividends which I think will make them shift into treasuries and bonds over time. Then you have issue of can USA companies even compete on global market, come sure can like big pharma, oil, but other whole industries are dying like autos. I don't see this recovery for a multitude of reasons not just one.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

No bond funds?

Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?

I stopped giving advice about a year and a half ago, I am 95% in corporate bonds and gold personally.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?
I hear this a lot. Only a fool sells down. But really, that fails the sunk cost fallacy test. Money has no memory, it doesn't care what it used to be, only what it is now, and regardless of what an investment has done, whether that's go up or down, you keep it based on what it will do, so if you bought in at 14k and sold at 10k, yeah you lost, but not as much as if you sold at 7.5k.

How many people were chastised for selling, for example, Nikkei when it started to fall from its 39k. Do you think those bulls are feeling happy with themselves now, potentially holding the same stock that is worth a fifth of what it was twenty years ago? I remember this discussion on AT last year and at least a couple of posters calling people dumb for getting out--and that was before the DOW got to 10k. Well, it turned out to be the right move. Even if a person got out at 11k and bought all in now they would have done a great job of protecting a large amount of their investment. If only we really knew where it would go, but then it wouldn't be any "fun".
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

No bond funds?

Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?

I stopped giving advice about a year and a half ago, I am 95% in corporate bonds and gold personally.

I hope you're selling off gold now to keep the allocation in line with your policy portfolio
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Possessed Freak
Well, I didn't think it was going this low. I entered at 8200 back in October.
It's started to accelerate in the last hour or so, down, down down...

 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

No bond funds?

Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?

I stopped giving advice about a year and a half ago, I am 95% in corporate bonds and gold personally.

I hope you're selling off gold now to keep the allocation in line with your policy portfolio

I plead ignorance to WTF a policy portfolio is???
 

fisheerman

Senior member
Oct 25, 2006
733
0
0
I am one of the few actually buying today:confused:

Picked up some more VZ, WMT, KO and RIMM.

Been sitting on about 12K in my trading account and missed the last gap up.

Personnally I think we are going to be sideways for a long time stuck in the trading range 7K-88OO and Ill be buying on the dips (like today) and dumping on the highs.

One thing to remember is that there is a ton of money(cash) on the sidelines and the least little bit of good news could send a flood to the market.

Long term if you can pick the companies that are going to make it this is an excellent buying opp. I've got 30+ years so I'm not to concerned with trading big name stable companies.

Good Luck

"feed when the blood is in the water"

-fish
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Wow...

I've been out of equities for some time now, this isn't pretty :(

I didn't have a choice in the matter. Back when i worked we had this thing called a 403b where they made you invest in their scam. Only allowed to chose between 10 mutuals, Can not even roll over to IRA.:|

No bond funds?

Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?

I stopped giving advice about a year and a half ago, I am 95% in corporate bonds and gold personally.

I hope you're selling off gold now to keep the allocation in line with your policy portfolio

I plead ignorance to WTF a policy portfolio is???

It's your basic allocation of assets for a long horizon. Say you're in your 40s-50s (pretty risk averse), say your MV optimized portfolio comes out to be 70% fixed income, 20% equity, 5% precious metals, 5% commodities. You can tweak that given the economic outlook etc (overweight on fixed income, underweight equity etc).

The basic idea is that when one asset goes through the roof (say gold goes from 800 to 1000/oz or up 25%.) So now instead of having 5% precious metals, you have 6.25% in precious metals, thus you should be selling gold to get back down to 5%

 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Zebo
Yeah their are 2 (one inflation linked and a general) and both lost 1-3% last few years -less than growth funds did but once you already lost x better to stay in while down, no?
I hear this a lot. Only a fool sells down. But really, that fails the sunk cost fallacy test. Money has no memory, it doesn't care what it used to be, only what it is now, and regardless of what an investment has done, whether that's go up or down, you keep it based on what it will do, so if you bought in at 14k and sold at 10k, yeah you lost, but not as much as if you sold at 7.5k.

How many people were chastised for selling, for example, Nikkei when it started to fall from its 39k. Do you think those bulls are feeling happy with themselves now, potentially holding the same stock that is worth a fifth of what it was twenty years ago? I remember this discussion on AT last year and at least a couple of posters calling people dumb for getting out--and that was before the DOW got to 10k. Well, it turned out to be the right move. Even if a person got out at 11k and bought all in now they would have done a great job of protecting a large amount of their investment. If only we really knew where it would go, but then it wouldn't be any "fun".

It's true. It's like saying I'm due for a pair of AA in poker when every hand is a new 1/2074 chance, nothing due, just like no guarantee market will go back up. I was already down, not paying attention, then banked on election bump which failed to materialize. Now it does not matter I only have 47K left I mean not material to me at this point and sometime in the next 22 years before I can tap it there SHOULD be a recovery due to Dullards reasoning of excess cash and exponential pop growth.. Either way fuck it - this scam. I wrote it off. Close my eyes and all in/:p
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: ayabe
You're right bitches, McCain would be owning this shit.

In fact, we'd all be toasting DOW 15,000 is we just got those corporate tax rates to zero, oh well too bad we chose the black guy, nothing but the gulag for us now.
I've heard of buuuh buuuuuh buuuh Bush....

Buuuh buuh buuh Mccain?
I believe she was mocking you for being such a partisan buffoon. Obama won. Grow up and get over it.
Oh the irony...

I was pointing out that Obama won, not Mccain, so diverting to McCain isnt valid. Thank you for backing me up.
ROFL. That whistling sound you heard was the point soaring far over your head. Our economic situation today would be exactly the same had McCain been elected, making your childish dig at Obama purely pointless partisan stupidity. You may want to stop digging now.

(By the way, it's dishonest to alter someone's quote without showing you've done so.)

Not quite Bow, small businessmen I know are laying off with a wink and a nudge to me thinking they can derail Obama's plans visa vi making economy worse, unemployment worse and claiming he will make their life hell so they better cut all fat, save cash, and otherwise take to ground. Banking on dissatisfaction 2010 or 2012 to 'get their way' One guy is so partisan he just closed his auto paint shop and laid off all claiming Obama's EPA will ban this and that, and have him paying health care and unemployment into perpetuity, not worth it to him - so he's fishing today while I'm working.:(


Small business employs most people, so my anecdotes are having a deleterious effect, at least locally - can't comment on corporate America but I would imagine same mentality runs to the top.
 

wwswimming

Banned
Jan 21, 2006
3,695
1
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: Possessed Freak
Well, I didn't think it was going this low. I entered at 8200 back in October.
It's started to accelerate in the last hour or so, down, down down...

like Eddy Murphy in Undercover Cop

it's going deep Deep DEEP under cover :sun:

http://biz.yahoo.com/cnbc/090220/29300222.html?.v=1

"No Patience, Some Hope. . . Looking for a Bottom"

Hope is not a good investment strategy.


an excerpt from one of John Mauldin's analyses of the S&P 500.

Cliff's - he makes a very good case for S&P 500 @ 30 x whatever you think is a reasonable P/E ratio for S&P 500 companies.


"Earnings forecasts just keep dropping."

Those Wild and Crazy Analysts

I have been writing about analyst earnings forecasts for some time. Earnings forecasts just keep dropping. I talked with the very interesting and gentlemanly Howard Silverblat from Standard & Poors, who is in charge of assembling the data for the S&P earnings. When I went to the web site, I noticed that "core" earnings were not on the spreadsheet. Core earnings take into account pension fund commitments and other items that sometimes do not make it into reported or operating earnings. During the last bear market, core earnings were a lot lower than reported earnings, as companies adjusted their pension commitments to make things look better than they were. I was wondering if we would see the same thing happening now.

I asked Howard about that, and he said they were having some issues in calculating them but expected the core earnings numbers to be back up in a month or so. And he quoted sources that suggested S&P companies were underfunded by $250 billion in their defined-benefit pension plans. Late last year, the Bush administration waived the requirement that companies fund their pensions to at least 92% of needed capital. It is now down to 80%. That leaves companies some room to play with on their balance sheets.

I commented on how bad earnings were last quarter. The web site shows earnings were a negative $3.14 a share, the first time they have ever been negative for a quarter. Ever! That was with 65% of companies reporting. He commented that it was worse than that. They don't have it up yet, but with 78% of companies reporting, losses are now a staggering -$8.56 a share. And it could get worse. The write-offs this quarter are just huge."

estimates for 2008, + actual earnings #


"As he wrote, companies are not only throwing in the kitchen sink, but the refrigerator, washer, and anything else they can find as they seek to write off everything they can, to get it over with and start the new year fresh. They need to do a kitchen remodel, but there is no financing available.

So, how does that affect total earnings for 2008? The table above shows analyst projections from March of 2007 through today. Notice how they kept falling over time. They are now down 70% from what was expected two years ago. Earnings for 2008 are a paltry $29.57 and dropping. The S&P 500 closed at 868.60. That makes the P/E (price to earnings) ratio 29.4. (I use a decimal to show I have a sense of humor.)

So, what are they projecting for 2009? Let's take a look. Notice that they too have been falling over time."

projections for 2009, as of Feb 2009


"If the S&P 500 were to close where it is today, and using the estimates for the first two quarters of 2009, the P/E ratio would be 36.4 on July 1.

But what if earnings merely fall to where they were in the last recession, or about 55-60% of where the projections are today? That would drop the 12-month trailing earnings for the four quarters ending June 30 to $15.90 and result in a nose-bleed P/E of 54.7 by the middle of the year.

If earnings don't come in dramatically better for the first quarter as opposed to last quarter, we could be setting up for a nasty summer bear market. Even in the bear market of 2001-2, the P/E did not get above 47. Which, by the way, at a 47 multiple would correspond to a range for the S&P of either 1111 if the earnings come in as projected or 731 if they come in at the lower range.

I see nothing on the horizon which suggests the economy is going to get manifestly stronger in the next two quarters. The real risk is that earnings come in weak for both quarters and investors simply despair this summer, throwing in the towel and bringing about a vicious bear market. I would seriously consider hedging any long positions you have before earnings season this next April. If they come in stronger, then we will see."


normally a P/E above 15 is what occurs for companies with growth expectations - it used to be.

Microsoft's PE is currently less than 10.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=msft

Anyway, i expect the Dow to fall in concert with the S&P. it's worth finding out how indexes like the Dow are cooked up. there is some weighting that causes them to understate the extent of a market fall. right now one of the Dow components that's propping it up is IBM stock.


i think the market will fall in 3 segments, as the reality of our financial and other circumstances set in. we've already had one segment, from 13,000 in May 2008 to about 8500, where it plateau'd for a few months.

with each segment, a market fall in the ball park of 40% (unless the index is re-formulated to make it less scary. )

8500 x 60% (minus 40%) ~ 5000, this year. in the range of 5000-6000.


of course, at the same time as all these stocks are falling, the government is printing lots of money. that money's got to go somewhere, and some of it will go to the stock market.


 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Those look like meaningful numbers wwswimming. The idea that the S&P is at a fair market value now, as the consensus is growing on, is based on recent earnings, not future, right? So, given that companies are slashing earnings like fricking mad (JCPenny down 51%, lowes down 60% reported in the last day), still prices may be too high.