JSt0rm
Lifer
- Sep 5, 2000
- 27,399
- 3,948
- 126
Originally posted by: amdhunter
I would love to see it fall to the low 6000 range. I love anarchy.
republican?
Originally posted by: amdhunter
I would love to see it fall to the low 6000 range. I love anarchy.
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
ROFL. That whistling sound you heard was the point soaring far over your head. Our economic situation today would be exactly the same had McCain been elected, making your childish dig at Obama purely pointless partisan stupidity. You may want to stop digging now.Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Oh the irony...Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I believe she was mocking you for being such a partisan buffoon. Obama won. Grow up and get over it.Originally posted by: Ocguy31
I've heard of buuuh buuuuuh buuuh Bush....Originally posted by: ayabe
You're right bitches, McCain would be owning this shit.
In fact, we'd all be toasting DOW 15,000 is we just got those corporate tax rates to zero, oh well too bad we chose the black guy, nothing but the gulag for us now.
Buuuh buuh buuh Mccain?
I was pointing out that Obama won, not Mccain, so diverting to McCain isnt valid. Thank you for backing me up.
(By the way, it's dishonest to alter someone's quote without showing you've done so.)
Wrong yearOriginally posted by: loki8481
looks like glugglug came closest?
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...id=52&threadid=2144950
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Futures are down substantially. I've been watching these for months and they rarely get much more than 100 or so down, even on the days we've seen a huge drop (I know they hit their limit one of those days a while back, though). That's where they are today (130 or so). From time to time the futures will be way down and the day finishes up, however.
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dphantom
It's all Bush's fault.
It's a lot Bush's fault. Can you argue that, or only your straw man?
Sensitive aren't we?
Of course much is the Bush admins fault. But there is plenty to go around. No one and I mean no one has clean hands in this.
That's why all the finger pointing is meaningless at this point. We need to worry about fixing the problem.
Ya, but we need to understand why the problem happened, in order to fix it.
If you have a lot of drunk driving, but no laws against it, you can't fix the problem simply by improving the medical care and first responder budgets.
When the wealthy are able to dominate the system to the point they can force the rules to be good for them and bad for society, that's the problem and finger pointing is needed.
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dphantom
It's all Bush's fault.
It's a lot Bush's fault. Can you argue that, or only your straw man?
Sensitive aren't we?
Of course much is the Bush admins fault. But there is plenty to go around. No one and I mean no one has clean hands in this.
That's why all the finger pointing is meaningless at this point. We need to worry about fixing the problem.
Ya, but we need to understand why the problem happened, in order to fix it.
If you have a lot of drunk driving, but no laws against it, you can't fix the problem simply by improving the medical care and first responder budgets.
When the wealthy are able to dominate the system to the point they can force the rules to be good for them and bad for society, that's the problem and finger pointing is needed.
Except the wealthy still have to play by the same rules as you or I. Who sets those rules?
The government.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Most of us know the DOW dropped 90% during the great depression from peak to trough. However, who knew that the Nikkei (Japan) is currently down 80% from its 1989 high? They haven't even gone through a depression. Link
Damn, now that is just a SH*T investment isn't it? You drop in 100k and TWENTY YEARS LATER you are down 80%?
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Most of us know the DOW dropped 90% during the great depression from peak to trough. However, who knew that the Nikkei (Japan) is currently down 80% from its 1989 high? They haven't even gone through a depression. Link
Damn, now that is just a SH*T investment isn't it? You drop in 100k and TWENTY YEARS LATER you are down 80%?
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Most of us know the DOW dropped 90% during the great depression from peak to trough. However, who knew that the Nikkei (Japan) is currently down 80% from its 1989 high? They haven't even gone through a depression. Link
Damn, now that is just a SH*T investment isn't it? You drop in 100k and TWENTY YEARS LATER you are down 80%?
Yup and we're heading down the same path...
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Most of us know the DOW dropped 90% during the great depression from peak to trough. However, who knew that the Nikkei (Japan) is currently down 80% from its 1989 high? They haven't even gone through a depression. Link
Damn, now that is just a SH*T investment isn't it? You drop in 100k and TWENTY YEARS LATER you are down 80%?
Originally posted by: bamacre
Really amazing when you look at stocks individually. Dell at $8.12, Intel below $13.
Is this not analogous to the problem we see over time as more banks are being steamrolled by losses that were difficult to identify the potential for before it happened?Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Most of us know the DOW dropped 90% during the great depression from peak to trough. However, who knew that the Nikkei (Japan) is currently down 80% from its 1989 high? They haven't even gone through a depression. Link
Damn, now that is just a SH*T investment isn't it? You drop in 100k and TWENTY YEARS LATER you are down 80%?
Heh they also had a huge real estate bubble and like 15 years of stagflation. I've heard that at the peak Tokyo office space hit a million USD/m^2
They also had no mark to market rules, so no one know what bank owned what and deflation killed the consumer for 10+ years.
Originally posted by: KB
There are some huge bargains on wallstreet right now. I wish I had the guts to invest.
A pyramid or Ponzi scheme relies on new members to pay off long term members. The stock market relies on (a) new members and (b) company profits in order to pay off long term members. There is a similarity there, but there is also a major difference. The rise in stock prices is basically a pyrmaid scheme. But the dividends are not. Dividends historically were quite decent (approaching 5%). While that isn't the 10% that people expected from stocks (since that included an additional 5% pyramid scheme profit), it is a decent return. Too bad dividends were slashed in the internet boom and all we are left with is scraps and the pyramid scheme.Originally posted by: Zebo
Still overvalued like all stocks are. Whole thing has been about a 50 year pyramid scheme.
Originally posted by: dullard
A pyramid or Ponzi scheme relies on new members to pay off long term members. The stock market relies on (a) new members and (b) company profits in order to pay off long term members. There is a similarity there, but there is also a major difference. The rise in stock prices is basically a pyrmaid scheme. But the dividends are not. Dividends historically were quite decent (approaching 5%). While that isn't the 10% that people expected from stocks (since that included an additional 5% pyramid scheme profit), it is a decent return. Too bad dividends were slashed in the internet boom and all we are left with is scraps and the pyramid scheme.Originally posted by: Zebo
Still overvalued like all stocks are. Whole thing has been about a 50 year pyramid scheme.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Is this not analogous to the problem we see over time as more banks are being steamrolled by losses that were difficult to identify the potential for before it happened?Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Most of us know the DOW dropped 90% during the great depression from peak to trough. However, who knew that the Nikkei (Japan) is currently down 80% from its 1989 high? They haven't even gone through a depression. Link
Damn, now that is just a SH*T investment isn't it? You drop in 100k and TWENTY YEARS LATER you are down 80%?
Heh they also had a huge real estate bubble and like 15 years of stagflation. I've heard that at the peak Tokyo office space hit a million USD/m^2
They also had no mark to market rules, so no one know what bank owned what and deflation killed the consumer for 10+ years.
I'm still extremely glad this is all happening when I'm young and not a stock-heavy about-to-retire person who's outlook on the future has been shattered.
As the market falls it bothers me, but a person who had even a mere 50% of their retirement in stocks and was looking for several years from now to retire is running some ugly numbers. Of course, sometimes you hear of people who were almost all stocks and needed the money soon, and they are in a major world of hurt.
Originally posted by: dullard
A pyramid or Ponzi scheme relies on new members to pay off long term members. The stock market relies on (a) new members and (b) company profits in order to pay off long term members. There is a similarity there, but there is also a major difference. The rise in stock prices is basically a pyrmaid scheme. But the dividends are not. Dividends historically were quite decent (approaching 5%). While that isn't the 10% that people expected from stocks (since that included an additional 5% pyramid scheme profit), it is a decent return. Too bad dividends were slashed in the internet boom and all we are left with is scraps and the pyramid scheme.Originally posted by: Zebo
Still overvalued like all stocks are. Whole thing has been about a 50 year pyramid scheme.