brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 26,241
- 24,245
- 136
At worst it shows how liberals lie and attack when questioned.
Troll, troll, troll your boat.....
Or are you aiming for TH levels of stupidity?
At worst it shows how liberals lie and attack when questioned.
One side of me (the evil side) wants to ask how does foot taste?
The other side wants me to just let it drop because well, its painful to watch.
Read the thread title again.
Please tell me what part is wrong.
Please show me where I ranted.
What's your zip code? I'll try to find you some reading classes.
At worst it shows how liberals lie and attack when questioned.
You must be really dumb to not be able to read.
Don't give him that much credit. He's just a moron.
Does he even have a job?
These aren't attacks?
These aren't attacks?
Davos? LOL. OP must really be dumb if he thinks it's about climate change.
You must be really dumb to not be able to read.
....
Your thread title and original post are grossly misleadying because - even if you use the tiny amount of wiggle room available to you and claim that Davos is at least a teeny, tiny bit concerned with climate change, your whole point in mentioning in the same title "climate change" and "1700 private jets were flown" to Davos is to imply that these participants are hippocrites (and further implying that not even climate change advocates take it seriously). But since we know that climate change was about one-sixth of 1% of the agenda at Davos, your claims are utter nonsense and intellectually fraudulent.
LOL
No serious....I'm laughing out loud. Where did I imply any of that?
Please....please show where I implied that, or anything close to that. Please!
LOL
No serious....I'm laughing out loud. Where did I imply any of that?
Please....please show where I implied that, or anything close to that. Please!
So you admit to just trolling?
I was looking for an explanation, like I asked for in the OP. Then all the liberal nut jobs lost their minds. I cut and pasted the thread title from the article I linked to. I don't follow these conferences and I was hoping to understand what was going on.
An "explanation" of what? Why super-rich movers and shakers who were spending 99.8% of their time at the conference engaged in NON-climate-change-related activities traveled via private jets? This is your claimed justification for starting this thread, and you had no further agenda by trying to link "private jets" with "climate change"?I was looking for an explanation, like I asked for in the OP. Then all the liberal nut jobs lost their minds. I cut and pasted the thread title from the article I linked to. I don't follow these conferences and I was hoping to understand what was going on.
It wasn't about climate change, and the people flying there weren't focused on it so they weren't trying to be green.
Rich people took private transportation. Hypocrisy not found today.
Good enough?
Read the thread title again.
Please tell me what part is wrong.
Theres a great rumor going around: 1,700 private planes went to Davos.1700 private jets expected to Davos in Switzerland to discuss climate change at World Economic Forum pic.twitter.com/RUbMDYYksTWouldnt that be rich, given the prominence of climate change on the agenda for the power brokers there this week!?
Flightradar24 (@flightradar24) January 20, 2015
Too bad it isnt true, and theres data to prove it.
Look below. Boomer moved to FL because of it.
:awe:
The absolutely hilarious thing is that this conference occurs every year.For not being about climate change, it sure was discussed there an awful lot...
All of these pleas to stop climate change at the conference made by the passengers of those 1700 private jets...
Hypocrisy not found indeed....
The absolutely hilarious thing is that this conference occurs every year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
The absolutely hilarious thing is that this is not a climate change forum.
It is an annual economic forum, which means it should include climate change, whether you think it is real because climate scientists agree that it is, or if you think it is a massive hoax, because great scientific minds such as Sarah Palin or Jim Inhofe consider it a massive hoax.
Of course a World Economic Forum will cover the, uh, economic consequences of climate change. It will cover that topic as an economic topic, because it, uh, involves...economics.
It involves economics whether you're talking about innovation-and-freedom-destroying-regulations, or the economic effects of climate change on 7 billion human beings and the markets they are involved in.
Climate change is an economic issue, regardless of your politics.
But of course, the thread title is purposefully misleading. Outrage! Anger! Hypocrisy!
How does the Davos World Economic Forum itself consider the main points of the 2015 session?
Inequality, climate change, and terrorism.
So clearly, this was simply a climate change conference.
https://agenda.weforum.org/2015/01/the-key-moments-from-davos-2015/
I really, really want all of the righties claiming that the focus (or even "a focus") of the World Economic Forum 2015 (= "Davos") was climate change to perform the following exercise:
1) Do a google search on WEF_AM15_Programme_A3526EC2F4
2) Click the link to open up the full agenda (PDF document) of WEF 2015.
3) Search through all of the agenda items and try to find any that refer to climate change.
After doing this exercise, get back to us about how much of WEF 2015 was about climate change.
Try and get your damned OCD under control would you please?<rant>
I want you to show where a "rightie" has claimed the focus (or even "a focus") was climate change.
Your strawman is falling apart very fast.