[
Originally posted by: JZilla
AnthonyB, I have read your comments over at ars. And I think LG themselves are somewhat confused. And it's embarrasing that they sell the same monitor with different panels. Then they could at least call them something different, so we as customers could pick and choose.
I agree, it's confusing. I still don't know which panel I've got. And LG themselves don't seem to have a clue. When I first phoned LG to confirm the salespersons claim that their 16ms models used LG panels and not ones made by AU, marketing didn't know what I was talking about and didn't even know that 16ms was a hot topic. They had to confirm themselves with their Welsh factory. Mind you, they did also say that they was absolutely no 16ms panel larger than 17in in the pipeline at the moment, and then LG Sweden announce the 16ms L1910B and the 16ms L2010P.
How do you like the 1710B? I read that you had blur/ghosting in Q3. What I note here, is that the Hitachi 174 claims 12ms rise and 4ms fall, while the LG panel claims 2ms rise and 14ms fall. Anything additionally to say?
Not really anything more to say at the moment. I'm still playing with the it and haven't finalised an opinion yet. I was going to follow-up on Ars after I'd let it settle in.
I don't know how that ms difference between panels affects things, but I have been wondering to. The thread over at Ars discusses it in more detail.
What I can say is, everything apart from gaming, and ignoring the fact that the screen is darker at the top than it is at the bottom, seems very, very good. The clarity and absence of smearing while scrolling through web pages, even ones with black backgrounds and white text is a good as perfect. Almost the same with text based apps like Word and Excel. Text , BTW, is that sharp and sparkly, it almost cuts you. I have to turn the brightness and contrast way down. I want Cleartype. DVDs are fine. Sometimes I think there's more blurring than on a CRT but when I switch and compare, the effects I noticed on the LCD are still there on the CRT. I just hadn't noticed them before. Colour, brightness, clarity are all what you would expect from an LCD. There is the problem of the top being darker than the bottom. This could be just the monitor or it could be a fault. Backlight possibly dislodged during it's two day journel to my door.
But back to gaming. There is a lot of ghosting while playing MDK2, Q3 and Serious Sam, the only FPS games I've tested it on so far. They are not playable for me on this screen, which is a bit odd considering it's supposed to be a gaming panel and it's so fast elsewhere. It could have something to do with my set-up (Celeron 1400 oc'd to 1560/Radeon 8500le), but I can't think why as the games are hardly stressing my system and it all looks fine on the CRT. I'll have to do some more tweaking and testing.
To be fair I am not an expert here. I am not experienced with LCDs, I don't play FPS that often and I've not had an opportunity to compare the L1710B side by side with other screens. What I can say is this - as far as I can recall it has less ghosting than all the other LCDs I've seen demonstating games but I've not seen the Hitachi or any others that use the AU panel. I did see a Sony with a 16ms panel - not sure of the model and it was about the same as the LG in Windows, there was no game demonstration.
Personal sensitivity comes into play as well. For example, a local dealer was demonstrating a Samsung with a fast FPS game. Not sure which game - some dragon flying through the air and swooping down on townspeople - or which Samsing panel, but I remember it had received a good gaming review. It could've been a 172T. It had very bad ghosting, as far as I could see. Far, far greater than on this L1710B, yet the customer who asked for the demo thought it was great. Me, I almost vomited.
I'd say - yes, shortlist the LG, but check out the others as well.
Whatever I say or anyone else says it's your eyes and only you can be the judge. Make sure you get a demo.