Very poor article. Cannot glean much, if any useful info, aside from the fact the author is on a corporate tax screed.
Examples:
General Electric: The worst tax record over five years, with $81 billion in profits and a $3 billion refund.
What does that ^ mean? Did they overestimate their taxes and end up with a refund? What was the amount of income tax they did pay? The author does this throughout the list.
Pay Up Now just completed a compilation of corporate tax payments over the past five years, using SEC data as reported by the companies themselves. The firms chosen are top-earners who have filed 10-K reports through 2012. Their US Tax figures represent the five-year total of "current" payments.
This ^ tells me the author does not know what they are doing. SEC data is GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principals). GAAP =/= tax law.
Tax law is defined by Congress. GAAP is defined by the accounting profession. They are two different sets of rules and never result in the same profit/loss amount. Accordingly, there is little to no sense in comparing the amount of income tax from an actual tax return (his so-called "current payments") to income computed under GAAP rules.
The author needs to be examining actual tax returns.
Even adding in the "Deferred Income Tax" account from the SEC financials would helpful. "Current payments" alone is meaningless.
These are all multinational corporations operating around the world. I think knowing how much of their profit was US source and how much tax they paid to Uncle Sam on that would be helpful.
The article is a collection of random factoids thrown together and a narrative spun.
The US Tax Code is long past due for a major reform/update and everyone knows it, but articles like this do nothing helpful to the debate.
Fern