.

[FuZoR]

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: FuZoR
YES.. and if they are worried about abuse...

just let people that have 500+ post get to use em

How about 4116 posts? 😉

😛 fixed!

 

[ScrapSilicon]

Originally posted by: FuZoR

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: FuZoR
YES.. and if they are worried about abuse...

just let people that have 500+ post get to use em

How about 4116 posts? 😉

😛 fixed!

his edit was faster..😉

 

[bootymac]

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: Feldenak
No, too easily abused just like pics in sigs.

Size limit + mods = yay!

Yeah because the mods are flawless.

Well if users can get banned pretty quickly for posting links to bad images, I don't see how this is any different.

Besides, I'm sure more than enough of you are more than happy to rat on eachother and PM the mods whenever something happens 😛

pwn3d

And the mods rarely get those "bad images" quickly. :evil:

Aw man.. everytime I quote one and forget to remove the link, I get banned in like less then 30 minutes :|

 

[mugs]

Sure, as long as they limit the size to 1x1. Take your pick, all the colors of the rainbow.

 

[vi edit]

Who really wants to see goatse or tub-girl pics as a random avatar?

 

[vi edit]

WTF did tubgir1 become a banned word?

 

[Chaotic42]

I don't like them, but I'd get used to it.

 

[kkeennyy]

Yes because diversity in and of itself is clearly a virtue.

 

[dc]

no to sig pics.
maybe to custom avatars.

 

[konakona]

how about no avatars at all then? are you saying you are happy with these um.... xxx looking craptars?
ALL OR NOTHING!

edit : on a second thought, this might be interpreted both ways. of course i am against nasty stuff going on in uploaded pics. by 'all' i mean mod inspected pg-all avatars.

 

[klah]

Originally posted by: vi_edit
WTF did tubgir1 become a banned word?

tubgirl ?

Just banned for you.