.

[FuZoR]

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: FuZoR
YES.. and if they are worried about abuse...

just let people that have 500+ post get to use em

How about 4116 posts?

fixed!

 

[ScrapSilicon]

Originally posted by: FuZoR

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: FuZoR
YES.. and if they are worried about abuse...

just let people that have 500+ post get to use em

How about 4116 posts?

fixed!

his edit was faster..

 

[bootymac]

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey

Originally posted by: bootymac

Originally posted by: Feldenak
No, too easily abused just like pics in sigs.

Size limit + mods = yay!

Yeah because the mods are flawless.

Well if users can get banned pretty quickly for posting links to bad images, I don't see how this is any different.

Besides, I'm sure more than enough of you are more than happy to rat on eachother and PM the mods whenever something happens

pwn3d

And the mods rarely get those "bad images" quickly. :evil:

Aw man.. everytime I quote one and forget to remove the link, I get banned in like less then 30 minutes :|

 

[mugs]

Sure, as long as they limit the size to 1x1. Take your pick, all the colors of the rainbow.

 

[vi edit]

Who really wants to see goatse or tub-girl pics as a random avatar?

 

[vi edit]

WTF did tubgir1 become a banned word?

 

[Chaotic42]

I don't like them, but I'd get used to it.

 

[kkeennyy]

Yes because diversity in and of itself is clearly a virtue.

 

[dc]

no to sig pics.
maybe to custom avatars.

 

[konakona]

how about no avatars at all then? are you saying you are happy with these um.... xxx looking craptars?
ALL OR NOTHING!

edit : on a second thought, this might be interpreted both ways. of course i am against nasty stuff going on in uploaded pics. by 'all' i mean mod inspected pg-all avatars.

 

[klah]

Originally posted by: vi_edit
WTF did tubgir1 become a banned word?

tubgirl ?

Just banned for you.