McKenzie: New-look Lightning
TSN.ca Staff
6/1/2004
It was a great effort by the Tampa Bay Lightning in Game Four, and it wasn't a bad effort from the Calgary Flames, especially in the first period. That was as wide open a period as we've seen in this series and the Flames and Lightning both had twelve shots on goal in the period. Nikolai Khabibulin really turned away the Flames in the first period. The Flames had their game going, they were creating offensive opportunities, time after time Khabibulin stepped up and denied them.
Miikka Kiprusoff also played well and that's why it was a goaltending battle in the first period. The only difference between the teams was the Brad Richards power play goal, so there wasn't a lot to choose between them, but Khabibulin really made things miserable for the Calgary Flames.
The Tampa Bay Lightning did something a little bit different strategically in Game Four, and it was coach John Tortorella shuffling the deck, coming up with some new lines to throw a different look at the Calgary Flames. Fredrik Modin, Brad Richards and Martin St. Louis ended up finishing the game together; Cory Stillman, Vincent Lecavalier and Dimitry Afanasenkov also formed a line. That's a different look.
In the first period, even when he got the goal, John Tortorella was going for the kill shot. He started rolling his big line and, in fact, there were times when he had Lecavalier, Richards and St. Louis on the ice at the same time quite frequently. St. Louis had over ten minutes of ice in the first period, Richards was over nine minutes and Lecavalier over eight minutes -- those are defenceman-type numbers. Tortorella sensed that the first period could determine the outcome of the game and, even with a 1-0 lead, he wanted to put the hammer down, get the kill shot and get that second goal. He didn't get it and then he had to back off, playing the big-name players only about five minutes each in the second period.
I don't know if Ville Nieminen's hit from behind on Vincent Lecavalier is worthy of a suspension, but I don't have a problem him getting the five-minute major penalty. It was a hit from behind into the glass and there was no need for it at that point. Even if you think it was a borderline call, why is Nieminen doing it at that point of the game? There were less than five to go with the Flames down by a single goal. It was not a smart play and as a result the Flames found themselves in a big hole. When they should have been trying to mount a sustained attack in the final four or five minutes of the game they were trying to do it shorthanded.
The bottom line in Game 4, though, is that the Calgary Flames did not score a goal in 60 minutes of hockey.
Cheers,
Aquaman
TSN.ca Staff
6/1/2004
It was a great effort by the Tampa Bay Lightning in Game Four, and it wasn't a bad effort from the Calgary Flames, especially in the first period. That was as wide open a period as we've seen in this series and the Flames and Lightning both had twelve shots on goal in the period. Nikolai Khabibulin really turned away the Flames in the first period. The Flames had their game going, they were creating offensive opportunities, time after time Khabibulin stepped up and denied them.
Miikka Kiprusoff also played well and that's why it was a goaltending battle in the first period. The only difference between the teams was the Brad Richards power play goal, so there wasn't a lot to choose between them, but Khabibulin really made things miserable for the Calgary Flames.
The Tampa Bay Lightning did something a little bit different strategically in Game Four, and it was coach John Tortorella shuffling the deck, coming up with some new lines to throw a different look at the Calgary Flames. Fredrik Modin, Brad Richards and Martin St. Louis ended up finishing the game together; Cory Stillman, Vincent Lecavalier and Dimitry Afanasenkov also formed a line. That's a different look.
In the first period, even when he got the goal, John Tortorella was going for the kill shot. He started rolling his big line and, in fact, there were times when he had Lecavalier, Richards and St. Louis on the ice at the same time quite frequently. St. Louis had over ten minutes of ice in the first period, Richards was over nine minutes and Lecavalier over eight minutes -- those are defenceman-type numbers. Tortorella sensed that the first period could determine the outcome of the game and, even with a 1-0 lead, he wanted to put the hammer down, get the kill shot and get that second goal. He didn't get it and then he had to back off, playing the big-name players only about five minutes each in the second period.
I don't know if Ville Nieminen's hit from behind on Vincent Lecavalier is worthy of a suspension, but I don't have a problem him getting the five-minute major penalty. It was a hit from behind into the glass and there was no need for it at that point. Even if you think it was a borderline call, why is Nieminen doing it at that point of the game? There were less than five to go with the Flames down by a single goal. It was not a smart play and as a result the Flames found themselves in a big hole. When they should have been trying to mount a sustained attack in the final four or five minutes of the game they were trying to do it shorthanded.
The bottom line in Game 4, though, is that the Calgary Flames did not score a goal in 60 minutes of hockey.
Cheers,
Aquaman