119 Months Ago Today, Terrorists Murdered 3000 Americans

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,225
306
126
I just know I'm going to regret this forever and ever, but I'm going to TRY to make a serious post.

Abwx, Sarsipias, this forum isn't ruled by harassment. Anyone who can make a well-reasoned, sensical, rational argument is more than welcome. There will always be idiots here, however, that must be ignored.

However, I'll wager very good money that you're met with a similar reception anywhere you go. That is because your posts lack any basis in fact, or are clearly biased, or simply don't make any damn sense.

It has nothing to do with typos. It has everything to do with typing clearly, concisely, and presenting well thought out ideas supported by facts.

For instance:
Parents harrass their children which then harrass the world. This is the essence of the is thread and is the root of terrorism.

First of all, parents do not 'harass' their children. They can indoctrinate them. They can abuse them. But your use of the word harass makes no sense. Let's try to step beyond your poor use of the word.

The 'point' of this thread is in the original post. It's about a giant conspiracy, only supportable by twisted untruths. The suggestion being that somehow 9/11 is all the Jew's fault.

That is the 'essence' of this thread. There is not a single iota of conversation in this thread talking about parents who 'harass' their children.

Even if you had substituted the word abuse in place of harass, you would have completely wrong. Radical islam doesn't need to abuse anyone to bring them into the fold. Being taught it from a young age, or simply being foolish enough and disillusioned enough that you'll grab onto anything promising you a better life is enough to bring sufficient people to the religion. But we are now so far afield from the original topic that it makes no sense in context.

I don't really expect you to understand most of this. I've met posters like you before - their thought processes being so far afield that they seem to be holding a different conversation from everyone else in the room, making wild jumps from "The Jews caused 9/11" to "parental abuse causes terrorism". We'll see.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
10,591
3,060
136
Abwx, Sarsipias, this forum isn't ruled by harassment. Anyone who can make a well-reasoned, sensical, rational argument is more than welcome. There will always be idiots here, however, that must be ignored.

.

Fact that the OP has an anti israel/zionism stance , and it happens
that he was banned by a guy who is a die hard supporter of zionism.

This is land that was sold by Arabs/Palestinians and purchased by the Jews.
No one has tried to point out that it was confiscated.
Why should Israel not be allowed to build? Zoning regulations?

This is how how zionism supporters impose their opinions , by controling
the administration privileges, including in this forum.

Disparaging moderators in open forum is not tolerated here. Furthermore, your accusation is completely groundless.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I just know I'm going to regret this forever and ever, but I'm going to TRY to make a serious post.

Abwx, Sarsipias, this forum isn't ruled by harassment. Anyone who can make a well-reasoned, sensical, rational argument is more than welcome. There will always be idiots here, however, that must be ignored.

However, I'll wager very good money that you're met with a similar reception anywhere you go. That is because your posts lack any basis in fact, or are clearly biased, or simply don't make any damn sense.

It has nothing to do with typos. It has everything to do with typing clearly, concisely, and presenting well thought out ideas supported by facts.

For instance:
Parents harrass their children which then harrass the world. This is the essence of the is thread and is the root of terrorism.

First of all, parents do not 'harass' their children. They can indoctrinate them. They can abuse them. But your use of the word harass makes no sense. Let's try to step beyond your poor use of the word.

The 'point' of this thread is in the original post. It's about a giant conspiracy, only supportable by twisted untruths. The suggestion being that somehow 9/11 is all the Jew's fault.

That is the 'essence' of this thread. There is not a single iota of conversation in this thread talking about parents who 'harass' their children.

Even if you had substituted the word abuse in place of harass, you would have completely wrong. Radical islam doesn't need to abuse anyone to bring them into the fold. Being taught it from a young age, or simply being foolish enough and disillusioned enough that you'll grab onto anything promising you a better life is enough to bring sufficient people to the religion. But we are now so far afield from the original topic that it makes no sense in context.

I don't really expect you to understand most of this. I've met posters like you before - their thought processes being so far afield that they seem to be holding a different conversation from everyone else in the room, making wild jumps from "The Jews caused 9/11" to "parental abuse causes terrorism". We'll see.
Well said.

Fact that the OP has an anti israel/zionism stance , and it happens
that he was banned by a guy who is a die hard supporter of zionism.

This is how how zionism supporters impose their opinions , by controling
the administration privileges, including in this forum.
Lemon Law isn't being banned and he's very much anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian. For that matter YOU aren't being banned. You are free to make whatever points you wish, but if you wish to blame a particular recognizable group for some world ill, there is a certain minimum intelligence and decorum that MUST be used. For example, while I disagree with Lemon Law on virtually every facet of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, I can recognize that he is arguing from a reasoned world view based on (or at least cognizant of) facts. This makes him somewhat valuable, as in a debate the least popular voice is often the most useful. If we all agree, then most of us are unnecessary. The OP made a mostly unintelligible rant with facts at most tangentially related while ignoring other much more relevant and undeniable facts, a conspiracy theory yarn based solely on his hatred of Jews. This makes him undesirable, if only by lowering the overall intelligence here. The result would have been the same had his rant/conspiracy theory been about blacks, or women, or Mormons, or gingers, and his ban is no doubt not the result of this particular thread so much as about the cumulative effect of much similar behavior. It has nothing to do with Eagle Keeper's personal beliefs on the subject; had this been the case the other mods would have stepped in. The OP is NOT a victim.

This ban is not ATP&N becoming Stormfront. To the contrary, it is to AVOID becoming Stormfront.

EDIT: And the Jews are a tiny, tiny minority clinging to a tiny, tiny section under constant attack. When I read "zionism", I mentally deduct 25 IQ points from the poster. Ask yourself if you can really afford the loss without making your post senseless.
 
Last edited:

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,164
0
0
So say the guy whose country s foreign policy is ruled by the AIPAC.

See, you're free to express that opinion and you won't get banned for it. Because it is at least debatable. "The joos are responsible for 9/11," isn't.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
So say the guy whose country s foreign policy is ruled by the AIPAC.

Do you people believe that Jews sit around a round table every Saturday at temple with conference calls around the globe and conspire to control the world and steal all the monies?
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,458
2
0
tldr right now, but maybe i'll peruse it later apparently it has set off some feelings in a bad way
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
10,591
3,060
136
Do you people believe that Jews sit around a round table every Saturday at temple with conference calls around the globe and conspire to control the world and steal all the monies?

LOLZ...

Learn to read accurately before trying your poor usual rethoric
that is to distort other s people sayings as a mean to unrelentlessly brand them as antisemitic.
A poor zio fool tactic , indeed...

So say the guy whose country s foreign policy is ruled by the AIPAC.

Is there s a need to name this country, since you ve quite
some difficulty to not rewrite the things according to your
usual whining schemes.?...
 
Last edited:

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
Do you people believe that Jews sit around a round table every Saturday at temple with conference calls around the globe and conspire to control the world and steal all the monies?

No. They just plan terrorist attacks and discuss who they should silence in AT P&N.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,207
28,591
146
Do you people believe that Jews sit around a round table every Saturday at temple with conference calls around the globe and conspire to control the world and steal all the monies?

as crazy as that is, it's no more crazy that those people that assume muslims sit around a round table with conference calls around the globe, conspiring to murder every other non-muslim.
 

Oric

Senior member
Oct 11, 1999
871
47
91
Moderators should be moderates, not the die hard supporters of one world view that is often in hard discussion, if that can not be achieved, moderators of the other view should be chosen and participate.

That may ease the criticisms on the actions


====================================
FWIW

One of the reasons when I was selected as a Moderator, was that I had different viewpoints than most of the existing Moderators.

Moderators are also allowed to participate in threads as a member. IF there is a problem; other Moderators are then asked to review and handle issues.

If you notice a Moderator participating in a thread as a member and then acting as a Moderator, feel free to report it.

EK
Admin
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
as crazy as that is, it's no more crazy that those people that assume muslims sit around a round table with conference calls around the globe, conspiring to murder every other non-muslim.

That's because they use prepaid cell phones and donkeys for transport.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
See, you're free to express that opinion and you won't get banned for it. Because it is at least debatable. "The joos are responsible for 9/11," isn't.

No that statement is just as crazy. That kind of post is tolerated because it is just one line reply and most people write it off as either sarcasm or hyperbole. If Abwx created a 10 page thread filled with conspiracy theory nonsense about how the Jews rule america, I think he would be banned just as quickly.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,045
7,525
136
Moderators should be moderates, not the die hard supporters of one world view that is often in hard discussion, if that can not be achieved, moderators of the other view should be chosen and participate.

That may ease the criticisms on the actions

They don't moderate peoples views they moderate their behaviour.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
LOLZ...

Learn to read accurately before trying your poor usual rethoric
that is to distort other s people sayings as a mean to unrelentlessly brand them as antisemitic.
A poor zio fool tactic , indeed...



Is there s a need to name this country, since you ve quite
some difficulty to not rewrite the things according to your
usual whining schemes.?...

Do you believe Arab leadership (or what you call "palestinians") is willing to live peacefully side by a Jewish state?
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
10,591
3,060
136
Do you believe Arab leadership (or what you call "palestinians") is willing to live peacefully side by a Jewish state?

Certainly not with a zionist state that build its own prosperity
by looting the palestinians s rights.

At the time , it s impossible since the zionist ideology seems
unable to extirpate itself from its roots that date back from
the end of the 19th century and whose cosmogony is borrowed
to this times european far right ideologies whose most successful
regimes were the italian fascist and german nazi regime , and ultimately
the zionist regime over palestine.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Certainly not with a zionist state that build its own prosperity
by looting the palestinians s rights.

At the time , it s impossible since the zionist ideology seems
unable to extirpate itself from its roots that date back from
the end of the 19th century and whose cosmogony is borrowed
to this times european far right ideologies whose most successful
regimes were the italian fascist and german nazi regime , and ultimately
the zionist regime over palestine.

Are you related to Nemesis 1?
 

Oric

Senior member
Oct 11, 1999
871
47
91
They don't moderate peoples views they moderate their behaviour.

Yes, but they are inclined to moderate the behaviours of people of a certain view compared with the other side, that is why this thread is going so hot
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,922
40
91
Only a paranoid would ask such an unexpected question...

You both write incoherently and put spaces before punctuation. But you add unnecessary line breaks to your posts. Do you realize that your text will automatically wrap?
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
10,591
3,060
136
You both write incoherently and put spaces before punctuation. But you add unnecessary line breaks to your posts. Do you realize that your text will automatically wrap?

You should read a lot more in the technical threads, you would
realize that you re completely out of track...

Unless you come only at PN for occasionnal worthless and
undocumented explanations.??..

JS80 poor tactic is to say "jews" when answering a guy that
did write "zionist" , this in a pitifull way to make it appear as
an antisemitic and getting him banned..

Another tactic is accusation of sock pupetting , as he s currently
trying to imply..

Indeed, he is allowed to use an avatar that depict the muslims
the same way jews were depicted by the nazis , yet , the
so called moderators gladly support this behaviour , amounting
in US equivalence as saying that treating blacks with the word
****** would be freedom of speech...

Edit : Hey, the word is automatically replaced by these stars !!!

How hypocrite these people are : anti black racism
being finnaly condemned, they need to express their
visceral racism , so the muslims are the current prey..
Who s next ?...
 
Last edited:

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
But you add unnecessary line breaks to your posts. Do you realize that your text will automatically wrap?

LOL I've asked this question before. I was thinking it was a deliberate attempt to create a different kind of writing style to fake people out. Anywhere it seems likely there are a few sockpuppets in this thread.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
10,591
3,060
136
Anywhere it seems likely there are a few sockpuppets in this thread.

How funny to see people fool themselves.
So one would be crazy enough to answer to himself in a thread ?..

Zionists supporters think that everybody has their perversity,
wich is quite an indication.
A criminal will always think as if everybody was like him..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.