- Apr 19, 2005
- 7,461
- 500
- 126
Almost to big: http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/1938/81831426.png
Shouldn't flash drives be binary ?
Shouldn't flash drives be binary ?
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
I bought a 4GB flash drive thinking it was actually 4GB.
I'm sick of lying marketing. STOP USING METRIC.
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
I bought a 4GB flash drive thinking it was actually 4GB.
I'm sick of lying marketing. STOP USING METRIC.
Where have you been in the history of computing??? This isn't anything new.
START using metric!Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
I bought a 4GB flash drive thinking it was actually 4GB.
I'm sick of lying marketing. STOP USING METRIC.
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
1 Terabyte (1000 GB) hard drive is reporting only about 909 Gbytes in "usable capacity". :disgust:
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7488/19908007.png
Originally posted by: Jeff7
START using metric!Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
I bought a 4GB flash drive thinking it was actually 4GB.
I'm sick of lying marketing. STOP USING METRIC.
Gigabyte = 1,000,000,000 bytes
Gibibyte = 12???l3butts359 bytes.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
1 Terabyte (1000 GB) hard drive is reporting only about 909 Gbytes in "usable capacity". :disgust:
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7488/19908007.png
Troll post is troll.
More like, you get plans to build a 9x9 foot closet, but the specs use 10 inches per foot instead of 12.Originally posted by: FetusCakeMix
Think of it like this:
You build a nice big 9x9 closet. But before you can really start utilizing the space, you have to build some shelves, and maybe some hangers. Let's say you get 4 or 5 rows of shelf space. The shelves themselves take up space within the shelf, thus lowering the total available storage space of the closet.
And this is nothing new. Not sure why you made a thread about this in the first place.
Computers run on base 2, yes, but that's at a hardware level. Consumers don't need to see that, nor do they really care anyway.Originally posted by: BigToque
One of two things needs to happen:
1. Storage manufacturers need to report size in base 2.
2. OS developers need to display sizes in base 10.
Since computers run on base 2, the only logical solution is to advertise computer storage devices using base 2.
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
1 Terabyte (1000 GB) hard drive is reporting only about 909 Gbytes in "usable capacity". :disgust:
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7488/19908007.png
Troll post is troll.
I'm ranting about 4GB not being 4GB...what are you on about?
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
1 Terabyte (1000 GB) hard drive is reporting only about 909 Gbytes in "usable capacity". :disgust:
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7488/19908007.png
Originally posted by: SparkyJJO
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
1 Terabyte (1000 GB) hard drive is reporting only about 909 Gbytes in "usable capacity". :disgust:
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7488/19908007.png
ha ha, my 1TB drive shows 931GB.
Originally posted by: LifesABeta
nvm yes what a rip off!
but yeah I thought with storage you never get what is exactly advertised, it's always a little less. I forgot why though.
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
1 Terabyte (1000 GB) hard drive is reporting only about 909 Gbytes in "usable capacity". :disgust:
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/7488/19908007.png
Troll post is troll.
I'm ranting about 4GB not being 4GB...what are you on about?
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Computers run on base 2, yes, but that's at a hardware level. Consumers don't need to see that, nor do they really care anyway.Originally posted by: BigToque
One of two things needs to happen:
1. Storage manufacturers need to report size in base 2.
2. OS developers need to display sizes in base 10.
Since computers run on base 2, the only logical solution is to advertise computer storage devices using base 2.
For example, inches are now defined in terms of their metric equivalent, the meter, defined as "the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second."
No one really cares that an inch is related to the number 299,792,458 in any way. They just see it on a ruler and use it.
