-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
【Maxon】Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread
Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
CHADBOGA
Platinum Member
Great work.Just a few CPU that went trought my hands the past two weeks.
For me the most interesting aspect was to compare the single core scores.
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
I could not figure out how to do a single core ! Can you tell me how to do that ?
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
Is it the drop down if you click 'File' in the upper left hand corner?
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
Nope. I can;t do a screen grab right now, upgrading to 1903. I am on a different computer typing.
Edit: in the dropdown, if you select advanced something, then it shows. Running it now at 4.4 ghz (stock)
Last edited:
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
You select 'Advanced Benchmark' and that should bring the option for single core.
Just a few CPU that went trought my hands the past two weeks.
The score of the BR 9600 is worthless due to the single channel, i already pointed it when you posted such a score in another thread, it should score about the same as an A10 7800 wich is at 657 pts.
https://www.computerbase.de/2019-03/cinebench-r20-community-benchmarks/
I have another A8-9600 around, i may do it with DC if i remember it. I was really not trying to do a fair comparison, just saving results of computers.
That is honestly impressive. The 3900X is almost at the level of my overclocked quad Opteron (48 K10 cores!) which scored 7459cb multi. Maybe its time for me to upgrade soon. Its amazing how much progress AMD has made.
My new 3900x at stock
Your MT score seems okay at 7114, but the ST should be > 500 on R20. I wonder if it's down to immature BIOS?
If you haven't already, install the 1.07 chipset drivers and enable the Ryzen Balanced or Ryzen High Performance power plan and see if it changes anything:
https://www.amd.com/en/support/chipsets/amd-socket-am4/x470
(Assuming you're using an X470 board here)
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
Nice scores. Wondering if that power plan will work on X570, and I wonder if they will create an ultimate performance plan.
Very nice. For comparison's sake, a ST score of 515 on Cinebench R15 is within the margin of error for my Coffee Lake 8700K @ 5GHz AVX clocks using 3600 CL15 memory.
Multithreaded completely destroys mine, as would be expected. It may even use less power to do so, because my chip is pulling 151W package power per AIDA64 while running R20...
Disclaimer: I am running P3.30 UEFI version. This is before ZombieLoad/MDS vulnerability microcode and OS updates which probably won't impact Cinebench results, but will likely negatively impact other apps and benchmarks.
Curious results, at Computerbase they measured this chip at 500 ST and 4856MT, so basically you are stati,ng that your chip run at 17% lower frequency in ST and 11% in MT, wich is not possible, so much for the mixed feeling....
https://www.computerbase.de/2019-03...iagramm-cinebench-r20-multi-thread-ergebnisse
Sometings wrong with your results/configuration.
lopri
Elite Member
You have an interesting definition of what is not possible.
Those scores of yours amount to barely 3.7GHz in ST and MT...
Unless your CPU is locked at 3.7GHz or so those scores are not possible since this chip turbo at 4.4GHz in ST and run in the vicinity of 4.1GHz in MT.
Last edited:
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
I don't remember exactly, but me 3900x got somewhere close to that 436 score, as I have BIOS problems. You assume he has a perfect system, I have one of two working correctly.
That s why i linked Computerbase database where there s both their results and those from their readers, this way anyone can make a comparison with his own sets.
That being said there s a 700Mhz deficit in his ST score, i would imagine that someone with a chip scoring that lower woud first check what is going on before going to the conclusion of a mixed feeling about the chip...
That being said there s a 700Mhz deficit in his ST score, i would imagine that someone with a chip scoring that lower woud first check what is going on before going to the conclusion of a mixed feeling about the chip...
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
Well, my 3900x says its running 4.3 ghz all cores, but the scores sure don't look right, and I have other problems with it, he may have the same.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
