【Maxon】Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
S

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,912
1,569
136
Just a few CPU that went trought my hands the past two weeks.

c7E0546.png

0ECgIaR.png

hq03bYG.png

evDj9Au.jpg

WeBx5o9.jpg

36iBYkl.png

8POOoI5.png

PQrJ4Zs.jpg

V2jszPK.png

gueP472.png

thj69RR.png

y7ZPTqH.png

mQxM8I9.png

VFyFAwk.png

c7rWJU3.png

HnU1WpB.png

zYqqROo.png

gDHQOG7.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97, VirtualLarry, JoeRambo and 6 others
CHADBOGA

CHADBOGA

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2009
2,135
832
136
Shivansps said:
Just a few CPU that went trought my hands the past two weeks.

c7E0546.png

0ECgIaR.png

hq03bYG.png

evDj9Au.jpg

WeBx5o9.jpg

36iBYkl.png

8POOoI5.png

PQrJ4Zs.jpg

V2jszPK.png

gueP472.png

thj69RR.png

y7ZPTqH.png

mQxM8I9.png

VFyFAwk.png

c7rWJU3.png

HnU1WpB.png

zYqqROo.png

gDHQOG7.png
Click to expand...
Great work.

For me the most interesting aspect was to compare the single core scores.
 
Markfw

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,994
15,948
136
BTRY B 529th FA BN said:
Is it the drop down if you click 'File' in the upper left hand corner?
Click to expand...
Nope. I can;t do a screen grab right now, upgrading to 1903. I am on a different computer typing.

Edit: in the dropdown, if you select advanced something, then it shows. Running it now at 4.4 ghz (stock)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick
A

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,786
4,693
136
Shivansps said:
Just a few CPU that went trought my hands the past two weeks.

c7E0546.png

0ECgIaR.png

hq03bYG.png

evDj9Au.jpg

WeBx5o9.jpg

36iBYkl.png

8POOoI5.png

PQrJ4Zs.jpg

V2jszPK.png

gueP472.png

thj69RR.png

y7ZPTqH.png

mQxM8I9.png

VFyFAwk.png

c7rWJU3.png

HnU1WpB.png

zYqqROo.png

gDHQOG7.png
Click to expand...


The score of the BR 9600 is worthless due to the single channel, i already pointed it when you posted such a score in another thread, it should score about the same as an A10 7800 wich is at 657 pts.

https://www.computerbase.de/2019-03/cinebench-r20-community-benchmarks/
 
S

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,912
1,569
136
IEC

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,573
5,971
136
Markfw

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,994
15,948
136
IEC said:
Your MT score seems okay at 7114, but the ST should be > 500 on R20. I wonder if it's down to immature BIOS?

If you haven't already, install the 1.07 chipset drivers and enable the Ryzen Balanced or Ryzen High Performance power plan and see if it changes anything:
https://www.amd.com/en/support/chipsets/amd-socket-am4/x470

(Assuming you're using an X470 board here)
Click to expand...
Well, thaty made a difference, 515. Now lets try multi again.

Multi is 7035, margin of error.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97, richierich1212, Drazick and 2 others
IEC

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,573
5,971
136
Markfw said:
Well, that made a difference, 515. Now lets try multi again.

Multi is 7035, margin of error.
Click to expand...

Very nice. For comparison's sake, a ST score of 515 on Cinebench R15 is within the margin of error for my Coffee Lake 8700K @ 5GHz AVX clocks using 3600 CL15 memory.i7 8700K 5GHz 151W P330.PNG

Multithreaded completely destroys mine, as would be expected. It may even use less power to do so, because my chip is pulling 151W package power per AIDA64 while running R20...

Disclaimer: I am running P3.30 UEFI version. This is before ZombieLoad/MDS vulnerability microcode and OS updates which probably won't impact Cinebench results, but will likely negatively impact other apps and benchmarks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97, richierich1212, Drazick and 2 others
lopri

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,310
687
126
Brand new 3700X

Single: 426
Multi: 4316

I am having a mixed feeling about this chip. (Not just because of this benchmark) I will take time to study what is going on before I decide what to do with it.
 
A

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,786
4,693
136
lopri said:
Brand new 3700X

Single: 426
Multi: 4316

I am having a mixed feeling about this chip. (Not just because of this benchmark) I will take time to study what is going on before I decide what to do with it.
Click to expand...


Curious results, at Computerbase they measured this chip at 500 ST and 4856MT, so basically you are stati,ng that your chip run at 17% lower frequency in ST and 11% in MT, wich is not possible, so much for the mixed feeling....


https://www.computerbase.de/2019-03...iagramm-cinebench-r20-multi-thread-ergebnisse
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and lightmanek
K

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
lopri said:
Brand new 3700X

Single: 426
Multi: 4316

I am having a mixed feeling about this chip. (Not just because of this benchmark) I will take time to study what is going on before I decide what to do with it.
Click to expand...

Sometings wrong with your results/configuration.
 
A

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,786
4,693
136
lopri said:
You have an interesting definition of what is not possible.
Click to expand...

Those scores of yours amount to barely 3.7GHz in ST and MT...

Unless your CPU is locked at 3.7GHz or so those scores are not possible since this chip turbo at 4.4GHz in ST and run in the vicinity of 4.1GHz in MT.
 
Last edited:
Markfw

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,994
15,948
136
Abwx said:
This amount t


Those scores of yours amount to barely 3.7GHz in ST and MT...

Unless your CPU is locked at 3.7GHz or so those scores are not possible since this chip turbo at 4.4GHz in ST and run in the vicinity of 4.1GHz in MT.
Click to expand...
I don't remember exactly, but me 3900x got somewhere close to that 436 score, as I have BIOS problems. You assume he has a perfect system, I have one of two working correctly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Drazick
A

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,786
4,693
136
That s why i linked Computerbase database where there s both their results and those from their readers, this way anyone can make a comparison with his own sets.

That being said there s a 700Mhz deficit in his ST score, i would imagine that someone with a chip scoring that lower woud first check what is going on before going to the conclusion of a mixed feeling about the chip...
 
Markfw

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,994
15,948
136
Abwx said:
That s why i linked Computerbase database where there s both their results and those from their readers, this way anyone can make a comparison with his own sets.

That being said there s a 700Mhz deficit in his ST score, i would imagine that someone with a chip scoring that lower woud first check what is going on before going to the conclusion of a mixed feeling about the chip...
Click to expand...
Well, my 3900x says its running 4.3 ghz all cores, but the scores sure don't look right, and I have other problems with it, he may have the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom