• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

【Maxon】Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aspality said:
Yeah I raised it to 1.475v and I'm pulling that when I use the profile and it seems fine.
I have the Noctua NH-D15, in the CoolerMaster H500P Mesh case.
I have some pictures of it here if you're interested.
Click to expand...
1,475v???Your cpu will degrade very fast.Max safe voltage for 24/7 is 1.32v.
 
2700x is no more "monolithic" than a 3900x. The two CCXs are separated by IF links. Look at intercore latency tests to see what I mean.
 
DrMrLordX said:
2700x is no more "monolithic" than a 3900x. The two CCXs are separated by IF links. Look at intercore latency tests to see what I mean.
Click to expand...
True

would be nice to see more scores of 8C/8T Zen/Zen+ and Zen 2 on CB R20,

Strangely enough this 2x2 with SMT Off Zen processor(1200) shows nearly perfect scaling.

CB20.png
 
nicalandia said:
True

would be nice to see more scores of 8C/8T Zen/Zen+ and Zen 2 on CB R20,

Strangely enough this 2x2 with SMT Off Zen processor(1200) shows nearly perfect scaling.

CB20.png
Click to expand...

Here's my 3700x with PBO enabled and SMT turned off.

1566497658605.png

I didn't lock the clocks so the single core did boost higher. Does your cpu exhibit the same behavior?
 
Yeah, you can't compare the MP ratio between CPUs without taking the boost behavior into account. If you want to just see how well Cinebench scales from single to multiple cores between different CPUs, you'll need to make sure the frequency is static and not changing between the single and multi-core test.
 
Kenmitch said:
Here's my 3700x with PBO enabled and SMT turned off.

I didn't lock the clocks so the single core did boost higher. Does your cpu exhibit the same behavior?
Click to expand...
Without Locking the Clocks it looks like 93% Core scaling, please take a moment to lock the clocks(anything from 3.8 to 4 Ghz would be good since we are after core scaling at lock speed) and see how much that improves.
 
lopri said:
Your guess is as good as mine. Don't forget that these CPUs have higher ST boost clocks than MT boost clocks.
Click to expand...
It must be an algorithm issue since you don't have a Flat OC it's taking ST x MT = MP ratio, any chance that you do a Flat OC run? Even at 3.8 OC I believe we will see the true numbers
 
7025 and 497 3900x, 3600 memory stock, 1800 fclk

Bad...On my new x570 motherboard with the latest bios and all driver updates !
 
@Markfw

I've gotten a lot of results that low running stock on my system. With 1.0.0.3ABB and the latest chipset drivers, my boost clocks have been pretty low unless I start playing silly games with LLC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top