Well, I got mine in today and here is what I found.
1) These devices are great. They are truly plug and play and are easy to set up. They just work right out of the box.
2) They appear to be V1. I don't see V2 marked anywhere.
3) The encrypt button did not do anything. The enclosed quick start guide said that it was reserved for future use. The full manual disagreed. In any case, they did nothing for me.
4) Network cables were NOT included. This was expected by me in an earlier post. However, I feel that the manufacturer could have included them. I am pretty sure every other network device I have ever bought had them.
5) The firmware check utility reported FW version "3-0-3052". The FW upgrade utility determined that it was the latest version and did not perform an upgrade. According to the website, the latest FW version is 3.0.5, so I don't know whose math is wrong.
6) The FW check utility (and probably the upgrade utility) would not run on Vista 64. I have not tried the configuration utility.
7) And now, the most important part: the performance.
Here is my original setup:
1. Wi-Fi router in Room 1 (Office) on 2nd Floor.
2. Wi-Fi Media Center Extender in Room 2 (Bedroom) on 2nd Floor.
3. Wi-Fi Media Center PC in Room 3 on 1st Floor.
Here is my attempted setup:
1. Master PLA470 connected to the Wi-Fi router in Room 1 (Office) on 2nd Floor.
2. A 2nd PLA470 connected to Media Center Extender in Room 2 (Bedroom) on 2nd Floor.
3. A 3rd PLA470 connected to Media Center PC in Room 3 on 1st Floor.
I did get a great performance boost from the two adapters I installed in different rooms on the 2nd floor. One was the master device hooked up to my router, and the other was hooked up to a Media Center Extender. According to the extender, the network performance went from oscillating around mid-level "orange bars" to green "full bars". Notice that the Media Center PC was still on wireless. Because the extender was not a full PC, I could not get any specific throughput numbers. I did not have time to bother with hooking up a laptop either.
However, when I moved the PC from wireless to a third Powerline adapter downstairs, extender-related network performance dropped to an unacceptable low level ("red bars"). BUT, file transfers from a server wired to the router to the "powerlined" Media Center PC went from 2.8MB/s over Wi-Fi to 4+MB/s over the powerline (as reported by Vista). At the same time, an Internet speedtest run from the Media Center PC showed that bandwidth went up from 6Mbps to 20+Mbps.
Clearly, non-Media Center performance of the "powerlined" Media Center PC improved. However, Media Center performance dropped significantly. It is also clear that the best scenario for me is to switch the extender to Powerline while keeping the PC wireless.
This clearly forces an unfortunate conclusion: In my house, the powerline gear works perfectly well upstairs but does not "integrate" well with the 1st floor adapter. And it was the 1st Floor where I needed it the most because I was thinking about adding a Slingbox-like device there.
Unfortunately, this exercise just proved what was already known: The devices themselves work great. The technology is great and clearly has its place. However, your results will depend on the electrical layout of your house and the performance will vary. Because most people will not know whichever parts of their houses may belong to different electrical circuits, it is a "plug and pray" game.