Zhaoxin's ZX-F/KX-7000/KH-40000 and beyond

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NostaSeronx

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2011
3,686
1,221
136
Still wondering why the price ballooned.

ZX-C => ¥399.00(RMB) ~ $56.71(USD)
ZX-E => ¥4300.00(RMB) ~ $611.13(USD)
ZX-E (2P) => ¥18000.00(RMB) ~ $2,558.24(USD)

It is cheaper to get;
A10N-9830E or FX9830M from Taiwan for somewhere about $73 ~ ¥513.64(RMB)

For speculative reasons, the above platforms definitely won't be more than ZX-E even with a 35W Ryzen 9 4900HS, that happens to be cooled with a 70W-class heatsink.

Waiting for a Hong Kong/Taiwan company to make a Ryzen 4000 in NUC form factor or on a FP6 mITX-mATX board is more worth it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,637
10,855
136
I guess the biggest relevancy for Zhaoxin CPUs is for the Chinese government agencies' push for self sufficiency in IT, which got accelerated due to the trade war with the US.

That's one of the forces behind it. Not sure they have anointed Zhaoxin as their preferred supplier though. Huawei is their biggest baby, and it would be interesting to see a Kirin 990 square off against the best that Zhaoxin can offer today in some kind of state-sponsored Linux competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
4,952
7,666
136
That's one of the forces behind it. Not sure they have anointed Zhaoxin as their preferred supplier though. Huawei is their biggest baby, and it would be interesting to see a Kirin 990 square off against the best that Zhaoxin can offer today in some kind of state-sponsored Linux competition.
I'm sure they have a repeat of the ubiquitous x86 vs ARM discussion internally as well. ;) Not sure how unified their agencies has been in the past and whether they might have custom code on sides reliant on (Windows) x86 and whether emulation on Kirin would be faster than native on ZX.

I wanted to add that using a mainland Chinese foundry might also be a factor, but I see even Zhaoxin uses renegade TSMC nowadays.
 

Kosusko

Member
Nov 10, 2019
161
120
116
Nice desktop with Zhaoxin Eight Core processor

c06537734.png


HP 268 Pro G1 MT
ZhaoXin KaiXian KX-U6780A Processor
2.7 GHz
8 MB L2 cache, 8 cores
8 threads
ZhaoXin C960 UHD Graphics
70 W
Supports DDR4 memory up to 2666 MT/s
source: https://support.hp.com/in-en/product/hp-268-pro-g1-mt/32591011/document/c06537715#AbT2
source: http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c06558314
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

Kosusko

Member
Nov 10, 2019
161
120
116
I think such a PC kit has performance for many offices. And not only in China.
 
Last edited:

Kosusko

Member
Nov 10, 2019
161
120
116
I know that this is China-only product today.
They will still have a lot of work to replace the old x86 workstations.
 

NostaSeronx

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2011
3,686
1,221
136
Well this is interesting...

zhaoxinroadmap.png

Bye 7nm? Hello 16nm w/ Octo-channel? DDR4 and 128 PCIE lanes at a Dual-die & 2P setup? and 28nm w/ a 70W standalone dGPU.

Major Edit 1: This is KH-40000 platform, so it fits the topic. Potentially KX-7000 will be somewhere. *shrug*

It is weirdly formatted...
CPU Die => 2+ GHz / 16C
Dual-die and two socket => Octo-channel and 128 PCIe 3.0 lanes.
Which will be the the full 64-core option.

同时KH-40000将继续支持双路互联,即系统内最多可达64核心,并支持DDR4内存和PCIe 3.0。<==

Definitely not bye 7nm. Not going to edit it out.
 
Last edited:

dark zero

Platinum Member
Jun 2, 2015
2,655
138
106
Well this is interesting...

View attachment 19899

Bye 7nm? Hello 16nm w/ Octo-channel? DDR4 and 128 PCIE lanes at a Dual-die & 2P setup? and 28nm w/ a 70W standalone dGPU.

Major Edit 1: This is KH-40000 platform, so it fits the topic. Potentially KX-7000 will be somewhere. *shrug*

It is weirdly formatted...
CPU Die => 2+ GHz / 16C
Dual-die and two socket => Octo-channel and 128 PCIe 3.0 lanes.
Which will be the the full 64-core option.

同时KH-40000将继续支持双路互联,即系统内最多可达64核心,并支持DDR4内存和PCIe 3.0。<==

Definitely not bye 7nm. Not going to edit it out.
Wait... so 2 variants then?
One high performance/cost at 7 nm
One Low cost at 16 nm?
 

NostaSeronx

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2011
3,686
1,221
136
Wait... so 2 variants then?
One high performance/cost at 7 nm
One Low cost at 16 nm?
KX-6000 is the first die, KH-30000 uses it. 8-core plus Integrated GPU being a single die. KH-30000 maxes out with 16-cores w/ ZPI 2.0 which is package(socket) to package(socket) only. Point-to-point w/ 16 GB/s(128 Gbps).

KH-40000 is the second die. 16-core minus Integrated GPU being a single die, with two dies on a package, and two packages on a board for 64-cores. Package and dies probably are using a new version of ZPI; Zhaoxin Processor Interconnect. With that it might be bigger than KX-6000/KH-30000. It is also going to paired with a 70W 28-nm die, which is the third die.

KX-7000 is the fourth die. 8-core with new core plus new integrated GPU being a single die.

Cost-wise I would think the KX-7000 die on 7nm will be the cheapest. Since, it will build upon the infrastructure KX-6000 is building.
 
Last edited:

Kosusko

Member
Nov 10, 2019
161
120
116
Look at the OS options. That's a China-only product. I don't think it would sell well in the States at all.


Mayby not only in China because all service videos from HP Support are in English.





source:

At least it's interesting. Maybe at least we in Europe will see US-Taiwanese-Chinese processors in HP computers.
Who knows...


Review HP 268 Pro G1
source:
https://kknews.cc/digital/pb4646e.html

I think such a PC kit has performance for many offices.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,637
10,855
136
I was reading through that HP review.

It looks like the 6780A is slower than a J5005 in single-thread performance in every ST test from that review. It's turning in lower scores in GB4, GB5, and CPU-z ST benchmarks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

Kosusko

Member
Nov 10, 2019
161
120
116
A single-thread performance ?
Who cares?
I'm not buying a single core processor (1C/1T), but a multi core processor with eight small cores (8C/8T).

But I have to admit Gemini Lake (Goldmont Plus) I always liked it, but go for only quad core processor ...
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
5,313
7,981
136
You're kidding, right? Please be joking.

You obviously just don't understand. Single core performance doesn't matter. What makes these CPUs special is that you can buy 8 small cores that somehow use as much or more power than the competitors' big 4 core processors and still get blown out by performance in both single and multi-threaded benchmarks. All this while having an astonishing low perf/$ when trying to actually buy a system that contains said small cores. Why wouldn't you be super excited about this? /s
 
Last edited: