- Oct 10, 2006
- 21,562
- 3
- 0
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
Haha, that was rather funny. He had some good points, but as always he's more bent on completely thrashing a game then reviewing it ...
Exactly.Originally posted by: LumbergTech
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
Haha, that was rather funny. He had some good points, but as always he's more bent on completely thrashing a game then reviewing it ...
if a game is crap a game is crap, i dont want to know the finer points of its crapiness
from what ive seen of this guys reviews he is cynical but backs up what he says
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Exactly.Originally posted by: LumbergTech
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
Haha, that was rather funny. He had some good points, but as always he's more bent on completely thrashing a game then reviewing it ...
if a game is crap a game is crap, i dont want to know the finer points of its crapiness
from what ive seen of this guys reviews he is cynical but backs up what he says
Also, he only said good things about Psyconaughts and Portal, and those are two awesome games compared to all the uninspired crap we've seen over the past few years.
Originally posted by: Elcs
Despite his bashing of all things buggy in games or just plain crap games, I feel that he held back in his Age of Conan review so much, I am less inclined to trust him. In my opinion, he didnt bash it enough
IrishScott: I hope you are enjoying your game with "a gun that shoots shurikens and lightning!!!"
