No, I think this argument is crazy.
The context is incredible obvious (1:00:29-1:05:45)
His off-script statements reflect the sentiment at the time, which was over a year ago - that Zen 6 (Edit: *on AM5) is still (at the time of the video) unconfirmed from AMD.
Any poster on this forum could tell you that there will be no new socket unless there is DDR6 for client, and DDR6 for clients is years away.
How is that an excuse for Steve giving a bad advice? Because he was not spoon-fed?
That LGA1851 longevity was a complete unknown (at the time of the video), that Zen 7 was completely unknown, and so that he was not going to use Platform Longevity in his upcoming Zen 5 vs ARL video (which, btw, he hadn't even tested ARL at time of recording).
Tom told him, in the exchanges that Zen 6 on AM5 was nearly certain, and ARL platform was likely on 1 gen + maybe a refresh.
Again, how much spoon feeding is needed for Steve to make a proper analysis?
Anybody who watches HUB regularly knows that he constantly brings up the value of platform longevity in his videos, despite you finding an out of context sentence from a year and a half old video, where he was speaking from a place of unknowns.
I like Steve, I watch his videos, but that one particular appearance and what Steve said was a complete head scratcher. Maybe he was smoking crack or was doing it in half asleep being in the opposite time zone.
That's why that appearance stuck in my memory, because it was so out of norm, and then, when this new video came out today, on platform longevity, it is a complete 180 from that appearance on MLID.

