• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question Zen 6 Speculation Thread

Page 256 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I think the way the laptop market works, is that first you've got to have good enough performance. Once you have this base line set, the key to market share is giving MARGIN to the OEMs. Once you look things from this angle, you can understand why Qualcomm has been pushing expensive crap for the past many years and oems still went alone with it. On top of that, I thinks all the Snapdragon laptops are essentianlly the reference platform so they have taken away a big chunk of the platform development cost too. So even though the end product is not competitive, the oems are still more than happy to push it, with some marketing money from MS probably.

Now compare this to something like Kraken point, which is a perfect little chip for the majority of the laptop market: cheap, probably cheaper than Phoenix Point (? I can't find die size for KP), not an ounce of fancy tech (on-package dram, chiplets, etc), drops into last gen socket/platform, improvement in performance/watt. You get the idea.
 
You do understand that 80W is all Gator Range would ever need?
Halve that for a single CCD and there you have it, mds1-hi.
My point about form factor thermal limitations is proven by the initial reviews of HX 370 not maintaining peak 1T boost due to thermal throttling. Thats a single core @5.1GHz.

To say 1T boost @ speeds approaching 6Ghz will not be affected in laptop vs desktop is delusional.
 
My point about form factor thermal limitations is proven by the initial reviews of HX 370 not maintaining peak 1T boost due to thermal throttling. Thats a single core @5.1GHz.
Zenbook was an extreme example of a skill issue on ASUS's side, to the point where later BIOS updates decreased STAPM to like 24w. Not really the SoC's fault.

I don't think that laptop SKUs will have the same boost, but this particular device isn't really evidence of that.
 
Last edited:
Zen4 was also only a single-digit IPC improvement outside of games, but still a homerun in the end because clocks.
What? Nope.

If anything, the complete opposite. IPC is higher in productivity and scientific/server workloads:

AMD-4th-Gen-EPYC-Zen-4-IPC-Uplift-Server-CPUs-slide.jpg
vs Client:
Nárůst-IPC-mezi-Zenem-3-a-Zenem-4-v-různých-programech-a-hrách.jpg
Hell, even in this "gaming" slide, the 3 highest and disproportionately big jumps vs the rest shown are not from games (depends how you count Dolphin emulator I guess).
Note that Zen3 didn't look that impressive outside of games and CCD-latency-sensitive workloads, either.
Also not sure I agree with this either:
hqAVPMgLtjaGhijd7acX9U.jpg
All said "28 workloads" are SPEICrate2017_int_base and SPEICrate2017_fp_base tests. Which are anything but gaming workloads and are rarely "latency sensitive".
 
Back
Top