No one is making iGPU/GPU for client on 2nm soon except Phone VendorsA bit sad to see the iGPU being kind of relegated to a 2nd class citizen. At least with the Zen5 and previous monolithic APUs the iGPU would get access to the same process node.
No one is making iGPU/GPU for client on 2nm soon except Phone VendorsA bit sad to see the iGPU being kind of relegated to a 2nd class citizen. At least with the Zen5 and previous monolithic APUs the iGPU would get access to the same process node.
Well, as Raven Ridge/Picasso clearly proved, relatively powerful iGPUs don't do much for the ASPs you can ask, so they're mostly just a cost adder and it makes sense to prioritise cost over performance for them.A bit sad to see the iGPU being kind of relegated to a 2nd class citizen. At least with the Zen5 and previous monolithic APUs the iGPU would get access to the same process node.
Out of curiosity, is it mostly a cost/yield issue (not mature/cheap enough for desktop GPUs by 2027) or a volume issue (booked out for NVL, Zen6, HPC GPUs and phone chips)?No one is making iGPU/GPU for client on 2nm soon except Phone Vendors
Out of curiosity, is it mostly a cost/yield issue (not mature/cheap enough for desktop GPUs by 2027) or a volume issue (booked out for NVL, Zen6, HPC GPUs and phone chips)?
Raven Ridge/Picasso had the mountain of poor previous products and their accompanying reputation to compete with. They were good products, but, look at what they were selling against. Follow on products dealt with limited availability due to factors including OEM recalcitrance, AMD not wanting to over produce, and improving competing products as Tiger Lake improved a lot over previous Intel iGPUs, making that not as much of a competitive selling point in the market.
The other issue AMD continues to face across much of the market is that those processors are continually placed either in bottom end laptops that don't do them any favors with power/thermals, or, if they are in anything better, they are paired with dGPUs that take the place of the iGPUs. While they did gut the bottom end of Nvidia's mobile stack of cheaper dGPUs, leaving almost nothing on the market below the xx50 series, Nvidia responded by making the xx50 series cheap enough for laptop vendors to sell in the "in between" market that exists above barely above junk level volume retail models and the lower end gaming and professional market devices.
The market never really got to speak because there was barely an opportunity for it TO speak. I can count on one hand the number of laptops that were marketed without a dGPU, but had other useful gaming oriented features, decent power profiles for the CPUs, decent cooling, and weren't priced higher than other laptops that came with xx50 series dGPUs.
that could've been good enough for light/older gaming but everyone just HAD to put a stupid dGPU in them.
And why wouldn't they given that it's faster?
SMDH. All wtftech will ever be is a glorified news aggregator...lol look at this silliness. The 'kek already picked up on our discussion this morning and has an article about it!! They must have a bot scraping "Kepler_L2" instances in these forums....
View attachment 129555
![]()
AMD's Next-Gen Ryzen "Zen 6" CPUs To Feature TSMC 2nm "N2P" CCD & 3nm "N3P" IOD
AMD's next-gen Ryzen CPUs based on the Zen 6 core architecture are reportedly going to use TSMC's 2nm & 3nm process for CCD & IOD.wccftech.com
35W RTX 3050 is a crime in laptop considering how fast 890M/140V are it basically destroys the battery life for not that improved performance.
moooooooooooooom moooom mom get the camera i'm in the TVlol look at this silliness. The 'kek already picked up on our discussion this morning and has an article about it!! They must have a bot scraping "Kepler_L2" instances in these forums....
View attachment 129555
![]()
AMD's Next-Gen Ryzen "Zen 6" CPUs To Feature TSMC 2nm "N2P" CCD & 3nm "N3P" IOD
AMD's next-gen Ryzen CPUs based on the Zen 6 core architecture are reportedly going to use TSMC's 2nm & 3nm process for CCD & IOD.wccftech.com
10-15% speed ain't gonna make or break them, and N3p slots will be a lot more free.A bit sad to see the iGPU being kind of relegated to a 2nd class citizen. At least with the Zen5 and previous monolithic APUs the iGPU would get access to the same process node.
Open a Twitter account first to become a renowned leaker xDdmoooooooooooooom moooom mom get the camera i'm in the TV
View attachment 129562
N3P is getting Hogged By Nvidia10-15% speed ain't gonna make or break them, and N3p slots will be a lot more free.
It's a normal tradeoff.
I do have one.Open a Twitter account first to become a renowned leaker xDd
Naaa, tons of spare wafers after CPUs and phone turds move onto N2.N3P is getting Hogged By Nvidia
10-15% speed ain't gonna make or break them, and N3p slots will be a lot more free.
It's a normal tradeoff.
Again, 10% speed is not a dealbreaker for gfx.iGPU on N2P would dissipate less heat
At a tiny bit more money per wafer and generally more limited capacity.... it would also occupy less space ...
I think MLID mixed up with the clock speed.
Turin Zen5 (N4P) 8-core 32MB vs Turin Dense Zen5c (N3E) 16-core 32MB:
All core: 4.1GHz vs 3.35GHz.
Boost clock: 4.1GHz vs 3.7GHz
Zen6 (N3P) 12-core 48MB vs Zen6c (N2) 32-core 128MB ?
Yep, I still think only Zen6c is fabbed by N2 node. Is MLID referring to Turin or desktop Zen5? Cause Turin Zen5 is able to boost up to 4.1GHz ???
yeah it is, q3'26 ramp too.
Pretty much everything Zen6 not tied to gfx13 is 2026.
A bit sad to see the iGPU being kind of relegated to a 2nd class citizen. At least with the Zen5 and previous monolithic APUs the iGPU would get access to the same process node.
Well, as Raven Ridge/Picasso clearly proved, relatively powerful iGPUs don't do much for the ASPs you can ask, so they're mostly just a cost adder and it makes sense to prioritise cost over performance for them.
Nvidia responded exactly the same way they did back with Iris Pro - cutting the price of the low end parts so there's no cost advantage.Raven Ridge/Picasso had the mountain of poor previous products and their accompanying reputation to compete with. They were good products, but, look at what they were selling against. Follow on products dealt with limited availability due to factors including OEM recalcitrance, AMD not wanting to over produce, and improving competing products as Tiger Lake improved a lot over previous Intel iGPUs, making that not as much of a competitive selling point in the market.
The other issue AMD continues to face across much of the market is that those processors are continually placed either in bottom end laptops that don't do them any favors with power/thermals, or, if they are in anything better, they are paired with dGPUs that take the place of the iGPUs. While they did gut the bottom end of Nvidia's mobile stack of cheaper dGPUs, leaving almost nothing on the market below the xx50 series, Nvidia responded by making the xx50 series cheap enough for laptop vendors to sell in the "in between" market that exists above barely above junk level volume retail models and the lower end gaming and professional market devices.
The market never really got to speak because there was barely an opportunity for it TO speak. I can count on one hand the number of laptops that were marketed without a dGPU, but had other useful gaming oriented features, decent power profiles for the CPUs, decent cooling, and weren't priced higher than other laptops that came with xx50 series dGPUs.