Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 790 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Thibsie

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2017
1,127
1,334
136
Now stupid question, just for the fun.

Since GNR is of a lower rev than Turin,
A later could (huh, can dream hu?) bring some performance,
Maybe X3D would be later rev ,???
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Josh128

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2022
1,320
1,986
106
Get back to us with your analysis in October when Intel releases their Arrow Lake CPU's. I think we may be looking at Conroe 2.0
Based on what? Definitely not the Geekbench scores released thus far. Looks like Zen 5 with better MT...and thats probably exactly what it will end up being.
 

fastandfurious6

Senior member
Jun 1, 2024
761
957
96
how do both companies know in advance the average scores of each other so they are so similar?

on cutting edge CPU archs? the most complex devices on planet earth (and manufacturing lithography ASML etc etc)

some insane espionage going on
 

Josh128

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2022
1,320
1,986
106
how do both companies know in advance the average scores of each other so they are so similar?

on cutting edge CPU archs? the most complex devices on planet earth (and manufacturing lithography ASML etc etc)

some insane espionage going on
I thought the same thing when Zen 4 hit 5.7GHz then Raptor Lake came two months later and hit 5.8GHz, lol. Its...quite strange.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,885
4,873
136
Based on what? Definitely not the Geekbench scores released thus far. Looks like Zen 5 with better MT...and thats probably exactly what it will end up being.
13900K was better than the 7950X in GB MT as well, here how it ended once you threw apps in the pipelines, and this average comprise both CB R20 and 23, wich is to say to count R23 twice, as well as the AMD crippling Povray, yet it wasnt enough even with the 253W brake removed :

 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-08-24 at 00-42-28 Core i9-13900K i7-13700K & i5-13600K Gaming-Könige im Test B...png
    Screenshot 2024-08-24 at 00-42-28 Core i9-13900K i7-13700K & i5-13600K Gaming-Könige im Test B...png
    71.1 KB · Views: 20
  • Like
Reactions: Kryohi

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,247
16,107
136
13900K was better than the 7950X in GB MT as well, here how it ended once you threw apps in the pipelines, and this average comprise both CB R20 and 23, wich is to say to count R23 twice, as well as the AMD crippling Povray, yet it wasnt enough even with the 253W brake removed :

First, this is a Zen 5 thread and you don't compare it to Zen 5. Second, if Zen 5 is faster than its totally irrelevant.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,885
4,873
136
First, this is a Zen 5 thread and you don't compare it to Zen 5. Second, if Zen 5 is faster than its totally irrelevant.

This was an answer to the assumption that ARL being better in GB MT than the 9950X would imply that it would be better in MT apps as well, so this comparison make 100% sense, and even more with the core count scaling limited GB 6 than with GB5.
 

itsmydamnation

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2011
3,072
3,897
136
Nope, the official Zen 5 SOG confirmed the decoder works as intended - it is there to boost SMT.
no it doesn't , it details the way it works.
Which when you look at there own description you can tell its foobar and they are running it the best way they can. but i wouldnt expect it to get fixed in any Zen5 core revision etc.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,247
16,107
136
This was an answer to the assumption that ARL being better in GB MT than the 9950X would imply that it would be better in MT apps as well, so this comparison make 100% sense, and even more with the core count scaling limited GB 6 than with GB5.
which is totally wrong since Zen 5's single core is much better than Zen 4's. Post a real benchmark or stay out of the Zen 5 thread with irrelevant posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadRat

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,885
4,873
136
which is totally wrong since Zen 5's single core is much better than Zen 4's. Post a real benchmark or stay out of the Zen 5 thread with irrelevant posts.

I m talking of MT since the post i was referencing to mentioned ARL s GB MT scores as being a prove of likely better MT scores than Zen 5 in apps, dunno why you are talking of ST, here is the post i was answering to :

 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,247
16,107
136
I m talking of MT since the post i was referencing to mentioned ARL s GB MT scores as being a prove of likely better MT scores than Zen 5 in apps, dunno why you are talking of ST, here is the post i was answering to :

But Zen5 has great avx-512 support and that could make it a lot faster. Again, without a real benchmark and the windows patch, by the time we see ARL it could blow the doors off of it.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,885
4,873
136
But Zen5 has great avx-512 support and that could make it a lot faster. Again, without a real benchmark and the windows patch, by the time we see ARL it could blow the doors off of it.
Set apart y-Cruncher i dont know anything that use AVX512 when it comes to the usual apps and benches, so it s unlikely to make any difference, FTR Cinebench 2024 require AVX256 support at most, so that s the highest AVX that is of widespread use currently.

The advantage of Zen 5 could lie in a better SMT yield, but so far no one made tests about this possibility and yet that s very easy to check, wich tell me that most reviewers are not really interested by the underlying tech but by clicks on their pages and Youtube channels, last time i saw such a test was at Hardware.fr back in 2017.
 
Jul 27, 2020
28,032
19,131
146
More important question, how do you read it INT or FP heavy since GB6 doesn't distinguish INT and FP?

GeekBench6 reports four different types of scores, a value that's calculated by comparing the device's performance against a baseline.
Subsection score
The workloads are grouped by how the workload exercise the system, and are calculated using the individual workload scores. The subsections are Integer,and Floating-Point workloads.
Maybe the subsection score is available in paid version or while logged in?
 

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
724
2,682
106



Maybe the subsection score is available in paid version or while logged in?

Here's the split between INT and FP workloads present in GB6 suite. You'll have to calculate the geomean scores yourself though.
 

jdubs03

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2013
1,282
902
136

Josh128

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2022
1,320
1,986
106
Already seeing price drops. Look at that 9900X. 10% discount lol.
Needs more.
 

JustViewing

Senior member
Aug 17, 2022
269
473
106
Already seeing price drops. Look at that 9900X. 10% discount lol.
All the negative talk, a win for the consumer.