Zap's Mini Review: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Zap's Mini Review: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L

(Newegg link)

The Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L is a budget motherboard for socket LGA 775 based on the Intel G31 chipset for all Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad processors. I purchased mine from Newegg back when it was available for around $55. For whatever reason Gigabyte replaced the model with the GA-G31M-ES2L. I'm not sure exactly what the differences are besides using a better sound chip (Realtek ALC883 8 channel).

SPECIFICATIONS

GA-G31M-S2L
Intel G31 chipset with ICH7
Supports socket LGA 775 Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad
Supports FSB 800/1066/1333
Two DDR2 slots for dual channel operation, 4GB max
one PCI Express x16, one PCI Express x1, two PCI slots
four SATA 3Gb/s and one EIDE (two drives), plus one FDD
Realtek ALC662 HD audio with 6 channels
Realtek RTL8111C gigabit ethernet
Intel GMA 3100 onboard video with VGA output
Micro ATX form factor

BIOS

This is probably the most enthusiast-friendly BIOS I've ever seen in a budget micro ATX board.

FSB 100-700MHz
PCI Express 90-150MHz (of dubious value)
vCore auto/0.50000v-1.60000v in 0.00625v increaments
vDIMM auto/+0.1v/+0.2v/+0.3v/+0.4v
FSB OverVoltage auto/+0.1v/+0.2v/+0.3v
FSB DeOverVoltage auto/-0.05v/-0.10v/-0.15v
CPU GTLREF Voltage Ratio 0.636/0.603/0.560/0.54

Memory multipliers
200MHz FSB auto/2.66/3.33/4.0+
266MHz FSB auto/2.00/2.50/3.00
333MHz FSB auto/1.60/2.00/2.40
(basically no matter the CPU, 533MHz/667MHz/800MHz)

Smart Fan enable/disable

Use the keystroke CTRL-F1 to "unlock" some of the more "advanced" BIOS settings. I say "advanced" because while this is typical of Gigabyte to hide settings such as memory timings, why is something as benign as "floppy drive seek" hidden?

IMPRESSIONS

With one exception this is one of the better laid out "small" micro ATX boards. I call it "small" because it barely extends past the first row of screws on the motherboard tray. The "exception" is the SATA ports. A two slot video card will cover up one, and possibly two of the SATA ports.

There are two fan headers, a 4 pin for CPU and a spare 3 pin. The PCI Express x16 slot is the second down from the Northbridge, making RAM easy to change with a video card installed. The capacitors for the CPU VRM are solid. The 24 pin and 4 pin power plugs are in the proper locations on the edges of the board.

The BIOS makes overclocking easy by reporting expected CPU and memory speeds depending on the FSB and multipliers you select. This is something I wish all overclockable boards had.

Another BIOS feature is the ability to save profiles/settings. Now, other BIOSes have this in a sub menu. The Gigabyte board does not have a sub menu for this. From the main BIOS screen you have to hit F11 to save and F12 to load a saved profile. It allows for around 10 profiles. The neat thing about this is that if the board fails to POST, when it recovers it gives a "POST error occurs" menu where you can use arrow/enter keys to select how you want to recover, including last settings that worked, default settings and even select from your saved profiles. Very neato! This is a step beyond the typical POST recovery where it halts and asks you to hit F1 to enter BIOS. Speaking of POST, this motherboard will POST as fast as the other G31 chipset boards I've used (from Asus and ECS). Pretty nice.

OVERCLOCKING

With so many BIOS settings, the board should be a decent overclocker, and it does not disappoint. Highest FSB I got was around 480MHz using CPUs that default to 266MHz or 333MHz FSB. With CPUs defaulting to 200MHz FSB, highest I got was 360MHz. The limitation was the memory multiplier. When the motherboard detects a higher FSB chip, it opens up lower multipliers. One possible way around this is to do a BSEL mod. The chip that I had modded was not detecting properly on any board so I was unable to test this theory.

This memory multiplier issue will affect the overclockability of chips that have low multipliers as well as low FSB, such as the Pentium Dual Core E2140, Celeron 420, etc. High FSB low multiplier chips such as the Core 2 Duo E6300/E6550 wouldn't have as much of a problem. Of course if you are buying a new low end CPU, the best choice would be something like the E5200 which has a 12.5x multiplier. With such a high multiplier you can clock to 3.75GHz before you even take the RAM over 800MHz. Thus, with such a chip I wouldn't worry too much about the memory multiplier issue.

UNDERCLOCKING

Those paying attention to the BIOS settings I outlined above may have noticed that there are settings allowing undervolting and underclocking.

To get this out of the way, underclocking using the FSB simply does not work. Selecting any FSB speed below the detected speed of your chip will cause a no POST situation (followed by the POST recovery menu). This is a shame because the BIOS allows for speeds as low as 100MHz FSB to be selected. This would mean a CPU speed of 600MHz with the minimum 6x multiplier. Alas, that is not to be had. The minimum speed would be 6x multiplier times the detected FSB, making for a 1.2GHz/1.6GHz/2.0GHz underclock depending on your chip FSB. I suppose if the BSEL mod worked, you can do a "reverse" mod to lower the detected FSB.

I'm happy to report that the CPU undervolting does work. I was able to run my E5200 at 0.800v setting (detected as 0.788v). This is while manually set to 1.2GHz.

There is another setting that I did not play with, which is the FSB DeOverVoltage. This option appears after hitting CTRL-F1 from the main BIOS screen. Chipsets these days run pretty hot and draw a lot of power. Indeed in extreme instances such as the Intel Atom boards, the chipset uses MORE power than the CPU. Most boards have the option of overvolting the chipset to allow for high FSB speeds. At low FSB speeds, it appears that this Gigabyte board allows undervolting to reduce heat and power consumption. A nice touch if it works (again I didn't try it).

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming the current version of this board is as nice as the one I have, this board is highly recommended. Enough overclocking to satisfy most budget overclockers, some underclocking potential for those wanting to make an energy efficient home server. The current version runs $53 at Newegg, which is a deal for a board with so many options and potential. The only major drawback is that one to two SATA ports will be covered if you use a dual slot video card. If you can live with that, then this board is as good a choice as any other, and better than most micro ATX boards in its price range.

The Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L is Zap Approved
 

skillyho

Golden Member
Nov 6, 2005
1,337
0
76
I've had this board in my main rig for 1 year come next month. It's currently running 400FSB on a stock vCore 8400 (3.6GHz). It is the best uATX *budget-minded* motherboard I have ever used, next to my old Biostar tforce-6100 s754 board from 4 years back.

Edit: The newest BIOS is a must as it really helped iron out FSB problems I was having at anything over 378.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
I'm using F5 BIOS.

Originally posted by: skillyho
It is the best uATX *budget-minded* motherboard I have ever used, next to my old Biostar tforce-6100 s754 board from 4 years back.

You mean this board? ;)
 

wjgollatz

Senior member
Oct 1, 2004
372
0
0
Thank you for this review, I was choosing between this board or another one.

Would a right angle sata cable still be unusable under a video card?
 

skillyho

Golden Member
Nov 6, 2005
1,337
0
76
Originally posted by: Zap
I'm using F5 BIOS.

Originally posted by: skillyho
It is the best uATX *budget-minded* motherboard I have ever used, next to my old Biostar tforce-6100 s754 board from 4 years back.

You mean this board? ;)

Haha...yep! The s939 version wasn't too bad either!

wjgollatz: I haven't tried it....I only use two sata ports (HDD/Optical) but I know that any dual slot card will make use of more than 2 difficult. I can check when I get in to see if it would help.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Originally posted by: skillyho
Haha...yep! The s939 version wasn't too bad either!

Yeah, I owned around 4 of those. Last one had an A64 4000+ (San Diego core) overclocked to 3.12GHz for over a year in my gaming rig. Finally gave it (mobo/CPU) away to a needy friend, and upgraded to an Intel dual core setup.

wjgollatz, depends on which direction the angle goes (if it just points towards the other plugs or away) and how low profile they are. I've seen right angle SATA cables that were pretty retarded in design. Sure, they were right angle, but still way too long before the 90º bend.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,118
767
126
I just built a budget PC for my wife with one of these boards and an e5200. Aside from the slightly fuzzy output from the IGP, I'm very impressed. Excellent bang for the buck.
 

CurseTheSky

Diamond Member
Oct 21, 2006
5,401
2
0
Not to dig up a buried thread, but someone else linked to this.

I'm using one of these in my computer at work, and it's both solid and versatile. The overclocking options ARE impressive for a budget board, and I haven't run into any problems at all.
 

God Mode

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2005
2,903
0
71
Built a pc for my brother using this mobo and an e5200. I was very pleased with how easy everything went. This thread was what made me pick this particular board. Thanks, Zap!
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Originally posted by: God Mode
This thread was what made me pick this particular board. Thanks, Zap!

You're welcome. :beer:

EDIT: I just ordered another G31 chipset board. :eek: I'll post a mini-review on it when it arrives.
 

wjgollatz

Senior member
Oct 1, 2004
372
0
0
A Sapphire 4830, and I suspect all Sapphire 4800 series cards will not block the 2 higher SATA ports. The way the cooling fan housing is designed, a cable and be easily snaked around the fan housing and into the port, one right on top of the "handle" of the cooling fan house, and one right below it. I am sure the other manufacturers with similar designed cooling will be ok also, but on this card I can get the cable in without touching the heatsink if this is a consideration for anyone.

And test your SATA ports when you get it. I discovered a defective SATA port on this motherboard after warranties expired. The port closest to the CPU is defective. Worked fine for a bit, then stopped, started to work great when I changed the cable coincidentally, but now defective again, and I tested the ports this time. It will see the drive, but only transfers at 3 mb/s.
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
Originally posted by: Zap
Originally posted by: God Mode
This thread was what made me pick this particular board. Thanks, Zap!

You're welcome. :beer:

EDIT: I just ordered another G31 chipset board. :eek: I'll post a mini-review on it when it arrives.

I wanted to get this G31 board but the lack of pci-e 2.0 turned me off.
The next generation of video cards will be bandwidth limited with pci-e 1.0. In fact a gtx 295 allready surpasses the amount of bandwidth pci-e 1.0 has.

I was looking at the GIGABYTE GA-G41M-ES2L board for the 64$ price and pci-e 2.0 capabilities. I can't find any reliable reviews for this board.
Do you if this board will overclock like the G31? I was gonna pare it with a e5300 and go for a 4.0 overclock but I can't find any overclocking information on this board. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Originally posted by: happy medium
I was looking at the GIGABYTE GA-G41M-ES2L board for the 64$ price and pci-e 2.0 capabilities. I can't find any reliable reviews for this board.
Do you if this board will overclock like the G31?

Never used one and haven't seen any reviews, so I don't have the answer.

Originally posted by: wjgollatz
And test your SATA ports when you get it. I discovered a defective SATA port on this motherboard after warranties expired.

Strangely I am also having issues with the SATA ports on my Gigabyte G31 board. I'm trying to run two drives in my server. One drive is a 1.5TB Seagate. It works fine. I tried to put a second drive in, testing on all three other unused SATA ports.

Maxtor (Maxline, so not rebadged Seagate) 500GB works fine
Samsung 1TB 7200RPM doesn't work
WD 1TB Black doesn't work

The drives that don't work are fine and work elsewhere. Very strange. Being that the Maxtor drive works, I know the SATA ports aren't outright dead, but I'm going to be needing more space. I wish I had another Seagate 1.5TB (or 1TB) to try out.
 

Berne

Member
Feb 16, 2010
91
0
61
Hi ZAP,
Im very new...but having just orderd the above board , Im sure glad I read your post, Im testing some old processors for FS9 starting at entry level P4's , now on P4 with HT ( Biosbooster Great and Super Caps too! ), then perhaps the D seris E seris and then some...its a long way to go to reach quads, with no board change required, this is a real winner, you have a simply wonderful way with words. Oh did I say it was a pleasure meeting you, even if it was only in a textual manner.

Regards,

Berne:eek:

XPHOME going 7
P4 HT 3.2 2MB
500W Supp
X1650 PRO EXP
GA-G31M-2SL
WDIG 320GB CAVBLU
DDR2 2GB going 4
 

pchelka

Junior Member
Apr 7, 2010
1
0
0
I can see that someone dug this thread up again... so i'm gonna join with another question, for Zap especially.

Is there any other way than a "bsl mod" that you mentioned, to get a lower memory ratio?

I just got this board for next to nothing, bought a cheap E6300 (7x multipler). The problem is that i have a 1066 Kingstone corsairs running at 2,2v ~2,3v - i can buff them up on fsb and voltage to achieve to maybe 1333 or a bit more.

But with 1.6 ratio i still wont get what i can from this cpu (want to get to about ~2,9 ghz, with Big typhon cooling), on the other hand a glue mod seams a bit extrem for me 'yet'
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Is there any other way than a "bsl mod" that you mentioned, to get a lower memory ratio?

Not that I know of.

bought a cheap E6300 (7x multipler).
...
But with 1.6 ratio i still wont get what i can from this cpu (want to get to about ~2,9 ghz, with Big typhon cooling),

That would be 414MHz FSB. First, remember to actively cool the Northbridge. Second, with the available 2.0x memory multiplier your RAM would be running at 828MHz data rate, which isn't a big deal. Next step up at the 2.5x memory multiplier would give 1035MHz memory data rate.

What is the problem?
 

notposting

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2005
3,498
33
91
Hey it's a long dead thread I'm glad I saw. Been thinking about this board (well the successor).

I have a G31 Foxconn board (G31MV-K) and it's okay but *not* meant for overclocking at all.

Pretty much no options whatsoever, I have a Xeon e3110 (aka C2D e8400) and would love to get some overclock out of it. The Foxconn will only adjust the bus speed and memory speed and craps out when trying to put the bus to anything over maybe 340-345.

One thing holding me back is the effect it would have on Windows--with it being the same chipset and all (aside from sound/lan controllers and such) should it be a painless swap without needing to reactivate?

Sorry been on the AMD side for a looooong time and not too familiar with the Intel side of life. Certainly sounds like this board has many more options to get an overclock going though. All the walkthrough's on overclocking had a billion options this board doesn't have (I got it in a bundle with a bunch of other parts, I wouldn't have picked it as my first choice).

Thanks!
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
I have no idea if Windows will need reactivation. I've seen times where it has, and times where it has not. If it does need reactivation and won't online, you can usually phone it in.
 

notposting

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2005
3,498
33
91
Yeah it's pretty unpredictable, maybe I'll grab this board in a while, thanks!