• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Yowza!!!! Sophia Loren at 71

L

Lounatik

Golden Member
Has she been surgically enhanced? She looks amazing in this pic for Pirelli's calendar.

Pic


Edit: Man, looking at her neck, where most of the slags who have been altered look the roughest, all you see is smoothness. Sweet.

Peace

Lounatik
 
Sophia Lauren, I believe, is the sexiest woman ever to grace the movie screens. Fvck these modern enhanced chicks, Lauren had class, and real, unenhanced beauty.

You think ANY modern movie star will look THAT good at 71? My God!
 
:thumbsup: Sophia Loren is truely one of the most beautiful women in existence.

From wikipedia:
"The Archbishop of Genoa once said that although the Vatican opposed human cloning, "an exception might be made in the case of Sophia Loren"."
 
I think you're seeing more Photoshop than Sophia there.

She was amazingly beautiful though.

It's a shame that in today's media, what you see is a digitally enhanced version of the world. Even in the most basic magazine covers, they smooth out the skin, enlarge the eyes, enhance the colors, remove fat, etc.
 
People can think whatever they want about their idols, but at 71 the only thing that can make her look great is plastic surgery and lots of adobe photoshop, both of which she's probably more acquainted with than her own family.
 
Originally posted by: GuideBot
Originally posted by: Horus
Sophia Lauren, I believe, is the sexiest woman ever to grace the movie screens. Fvck these modern enhanced chicks, Lauren had class, and real, unenhanced beauty.

You think ANY modern movie star will look THAT good at 71? My God!
Click to expand...

:roll:

http://imdb.com/name/nm0000030/
Click to expand...

I never said Audrey Hepburn wasn't pretty. She is, without a doubt. I just think Sophia Lauren was better looking.
 
Originally posted by: Lounatik

Man, looking at her neck, where most of the slags who have been altered look the roughest, all you see is smoothness. Sweet.
Click to expand...

Here are a couple of medium-quality pics from The Russian National Orchestras 15th Anniversary Gala (March 7, 2006):

http://img140.imagevenue.com/view.php?loc=loc7&image=78819_Sophia_Loren1.jpg
http://img43.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc161&image=78830_Sophia_Loren2.jpg

And five more from the Sicolone, Lazzaro, Photocall (06/04/06):

http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sophialoren8ej.jpg
http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sophialoren026ra.jpg
http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sophialoren038tc.jpg
http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sophialoren044mg.jpg
http://img83.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sophialoren054dk.jpg

That might help judge how much was retouched in the OP photograph.



 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top