• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Your 'Favorite' Liberal Lie, Delusion, Equivocation, Dissemblance. . . ?

syzygy

Diamond Member
my favorite . . there was NO connection between al-qaeda and saddam. outright lie. there is a well-worn
dissemblance that follows from this lie once they have backtracked and lamely corrected themselves.

favorite delusion . . . bush rushed into war . . how do rush a process that has been exhausted by 12 long years of talk, talk, bomb, talk, bomb, talk. blix said he needed more time. yet he had the time and
cooperation of saddam hussein in 1990 and still managed to miss his weaponized nuclear program. doh !

dissemblance ? containment was working. true, contaiment kept hussein hedged in with his accumulating
ill-begotten riches, but containment was not a solution, never intended as a solution, and was proving to
be very costly, porous, counterproductive, and in need of . .. uh . . a solution.
 
Ok, have you anything to back up your assertions other than belief?

1) Where's the connection(s)? Notify Bush, he needs your help.
2) There was no threat
3) So spending $250billion, losing 1100+ US Lives, thousands of Disabled Americans, 10s of thousands of Iraqi lives, and letting every Terrorist and his dog carry off hundreds of tons of hard to get Weapons is somehow better?

There is no longer an excuse to continue supporting this war. 20/20 gives us a clear view of what the consequences of the War is, but you have to open your eyes to the Truth to see it.
 
My favorite is that there are no professional protestors & that the protestors never provoke the police, the protestors are always the victims.:disgust:

 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Ok, have you anything to back up your assertions other than belief?

1) Where's the connection(s)? Notify Bush, he needs your help.
2) There was no threat
3) So spending $250billion, losing 1100+ US Lives, thousands of Disabled Americans, 10s of thousands of Iraqi lives, and letting every Terrorist and his dog carry off hundreds of tons of hard to get Weapons is somehow better?

There is no longer an excuse to continue supporting this war. 20/20 gives us a clear view of what the consequences of the War is, but you have to open your eyes to the Truth to see it.

belief ? i don't mouth unsupported beliefs, much less misuse facts. the book is called 'the connection';
writer is stephen hayes. read it. you can google for the more current info . . . if you care. story is
developing.

'there was no threat' . .. 'there was no threat' . .. 'there was no threat' . .. is this your belief
(notify kerry who voted otherwise) or are you just shoveling this nonsense to save money on prozac ?

and before you could even finish your post, out comes another stupidity .. hard to believe the bush
admin did not emphasize the need to corral these weapons caches. the people who may be blamed -
and i am not heaping any 'liberal' blame on anyone this early - are those who were responsible to
actually secure these sites.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
My favorite "Hussien has vast stockpiles of WMD's"

<---still pissed off that the UN allowed him to stockpile dual use explosives:|

"Ok, just don't use it for anything bad...."
 
Originally posted by: syzygy
Originally posted by: sandorski
Ok, have you anything to back up your assertions other than belief?

1) Where's the connection(s)? Notify Bush, he needs your help.
2) There was no threat
3) So spending $250billion, losing 1100+ US Lives, thousands of Disabled Americans, 10s of thousands of Iraqi lives, and letting every Terrorist and his dog carry off hundreds of tons of hard to get Weapons is somehow better?

There is no longer an excuse to continue supporting this war. 20/20 gives us a clear view of what the consequences of the War is, but you have to open your eyes to the Truth to see it.

belief ? i don't mouth unsupported beliefs, much less misuse facts. the book is called 'the connection';
writer is stephen hayes. read it. you can google for the more current info . . . if you care. story is
developing.

'there was no threat' . .. 'there was no threat' . .. 'there was no threat' . .. is this your belief
(notify kerry who voted otherwise) or are you just shoveling this nonsense to save money on prozac ?

and before you could even finish your post, out comes another stupidity .. hard to believe the bush
admin did not emphasize the need to corral these weapons caches. the people who may be blamed -
and i am not heaping any 'liberal' blame on anyone this early - are those who were responsible to
actually secure these sites.

Oh, you're reading a Book, good.

Threat was?

Who would that be? and Weren't those sites secured prior to the War?
 
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
My favorite "Hussien has vast stockpiles of WMD's"

<---still pissed off that the UN allowed him to stockpile dual use explosives:|

"Ok, just don't use it for anything bad...."


and deprive them of their mustard gas perfume and botulinum eye treatments ? perish the thought.
 
Well,

Point one:
Correct! Saddam and Bin Laden were in the same hemisphere.


Point two:
Correct also! Bush didn't rush into this war. He's been planning it for years. He just had to have the power of the Presidency to pull it off.


Point three:
True! It certainly was costly. It might have been as much as a few percent of what this war is going to cost.

Come on, you really are a lib trying to make the Cons look bad, right?
 
Originally posted by: sandorski

Oh, you're reading a Book, good.

try it sometime. i do need to apologize for behaving like a liberal. even the little intellectual
welfare i gave went to absolute waste. daaang. i promise to destroy all semblance of pity.

 
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Well,

Point one:
Correct! Saddam and Bin Laden were in the same hemisphere.


Point two:
Correct also! Bush didn't rush into this war. He's been planning it for years. He just had to have the power of the Presidency to pull it off.


Point three:
True! It certainly was costly. It might have been as much as a few percent of what this war is going to cost.

Come on, you really are a lib trying to make the Cons look bad, right?


hey, thanks - here'a decent list for reference. thanks lib. i've read worse delusions, dissemblances, and
such, so dig really really deep to come up with the choicest morsels for our people. don't dissappoint,
ya hear ?
 
Originally posted by: syzygy
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Well,

Point one:
Correct! Saddam and Bin Laden were in the same hemisphere.


Point two:
Correct also! Bush didn't rush into this war. He's been planning it for years. He just had to have the power of the Presidency to pull it off.


Point three:
True! It certainly was costly. It might have been as much as a few percent of what this war is going to cost.

Come on, you really are a lib trying to make the Cons look bad, right?


hey, thanks - here'a decent list for reference. thanks lib. i've read worse delusions, dissemblances, and
such, so dig really really deep to come up with the choicest morsels for our people. don't dissappoint,
ya hear ?

Well, you must know better than the U.S. Intelligence agencies, the U.S. military and U.N. weapons inspectors. Wow, and why are you posting here and not working for the President?
 
This thread is turning into an apparent weak attempt to troll. The OP might consider bringing something of substance. 😉
 
Haha...he read a book. Eveyone knows books always tell the truth. I am reading this book by Ann Coulter and...........

 
Originally posted by: syzygy
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Well,

Point one:
Correct! Saddam and Bin Laden were in the same hemisphere.


Point two:
Correct also! Bush didn't rush into this war. He's been planning it for years. He just had to have the power of the Presidency to pull it off.


Point three:
True! It certainly was costly. It might have been as much as a few percent of what this war is going to cost.

Come on, you really are a lib trying to make the Cons look bad, right?


hey, thanks - here'a decent list for reference. thanks lib. i've read worse delusions, dissemblances, and
such, so dig really really deep to come up with the choicest morsels for our people. don't dissappoint,
ya hear ?

The fascinating thing is that syzygy thinks I am a liberal because I don't support the Iraq policy. Like the situation in Iraq, he misses the mark again.

 
Originally posted by: bozack
"what liberal media?"

In all seriousness, I wonder what is going on. That the majority of reporters are liberal is offset by papers being big business, which tends to be conservative. I know liberal POVs can be found, but it is interesting that before the Iraqi war few headlines questioned the need or accuracy of the premise for the war, which was for the most part WMDs.

Somebody did a piss poor job of asking questions, and regardless of philosophy, that never serves the public well.
 
You are truely wasting your tome on these blithering morons! They'll vote for Kerry because he is so dumb, he makes them feel good about themselves. It's a fact! They will never believe it of themselves because they are morons and there is no link to reality. You just can't get a URL for the sunset or the sunrise, the taste of good food, the beauty of the trees as they change. If they can't cut and paste it or link to it, it just doesn't exist in their world. To work these threads, you must prepare yourself to suffer fools at least without psychosis if not lightly. The horrible thing is that there may be enough of them to elect one of their own as a President. They did it twice! We survived him and I suppose that if we must, we will survive Kerry.
 
Originally posted by: Condor
You are truely wasting your tome on these blithering morons! They'll vote for Kerry because he is so dumb, he makes them feel good about themselves. It's a fact! They will never believe it of themselves because they are morons and there is no link to reality. You just can't get a URL for the sunset or the sunrise, the taste of good food, the beauty of the trees as they change. If they can't cut and paste it or link to it, it just doesn't exist in their world. To work these threads, you must prepare yourself to suffer fools at least without psychosis if not lightly. The horrible thing is that there may be enough of them to elect one of their own as a President. They did it twice! We survived him and I suppose that if we must, we will survive Kerry.

Let's use me as an example. I am voting for Kerry. What do I think of him?
 
Originally posted by: BroeBo
Haha...he read a book. Eveyone knows books always tell the truth. I am reading this book by Ann Coulter and...........

If books aren't your thing, watch a movie to find truth. Everybody knows movies always tell the truth. I'm watching this one by Michael Moore and...

😉
 
And to continue, their actions encourage terrorism. The bad guys know that Kerry is weak and will simply pull out, call himself a hero, and give them Iraq to build as they will without any way to know the next terrorist plot. Have you read this:

Terrorists hope to defeat Bush through Iraq violence

By Borzou Daragahi
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published October 27, 2004

BAGHDAD -- Leaders and supporters of the anti-U.S. insurgency say their attacks in recent weeks have a clear objective: The greater the violence, the greater the chances that President Bush will be defeated on Tuesday and the Americans will go home.

"If the U.S. Army suffered numerous humiliating losses, [Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John] Kerry would emerge as the superman of the American people," said Mohammad Amin Bashar, a leader of the Muslim Scholars Association, a hard-line clerical group that vocally supports the resistance.



Resistance leader Abu Jalal boasted that the mounting violence had already hurt Mr. Bush's chances.

"American elections and Iraq are linked tightly together," he told a Fallujah-based Iraqi reporter. "We've got to work to change the election, and we've done so. With our strikes, we've dragged Bush into the mud."

Mowafaq Al-Tai, a London-educated architect and intellectual, said different types of resistance fighters have different views of the U.S. election.

The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists -- Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.

The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case."

Abu Jalal, answering questions submitted to him through the Iraqi journalist, devised a simple formula for how his group's attacks on American soldiers draw votes from Mr. Bush.

"They say there are 1,100 dead soldiers. That means 1,100 families hold grudges against Bush and hate him. There are 6,000 families whose sons were injured who hate Bush and will not re-elect him."

But even within the resistance, not all agree that removing Mr. Bush from office would make a difference.

"The nation of infidels is one, and Bush and Kerry are two faces of the same coin," said Abu Obeida, nom de guerre of a leader of Fallujah's al-Noor Jihadi regiment. "What is taken by force will be returned only by force, and we don't care what the results of the elections are."

Among ordinary Iraqis interested only in a return to peace and stability, there is far less clarity about what the American election might bring. Many, like 35-year-old bank branch manager Sahar Mahmoud, say they are bewildered by media reports about the nuances of polling, swing states and attack ads.

"It's a very big political game, and something that we are very far from," he said. "We are very tired people, and we're just emerging from a big crisis. So we can't imagine what other people are going through."

Zeydoon Mohamad Jassem Najar, a biology student at Baghdad University, simply shakes his head as the U.S. politicians argue over his country's fate.

"It's like everybody is looking out for their own interests and nobody is looking for the Iraqi people's interests," he said. "It's like a game of personal interests between Bush and the other guy."

Mr. Bashar, a professor at Baghdad's Islamic University, said he and many of those who oppose the U.S. presence in Iraq were rooting for Mr. Kerry.

"I think if Kerry wins, he's going to try to get world support and United Nations involvement," he said during an interview at Baghdad's Um al-Qura mosque. "You'll see a different situation in Iraq if the United Nations is involved."

But Nazar Judi, a 41-year-old money trader who had his right hand cut off by Saddam Hussein's security forces nine years ago, is squarely in the Bush camp.

"I prefer Bush over the other guy because he knows Iraq well," said Mr. Judi, who received a new prosthetic hand from the U.S. Army and was flown to Washington to meet Mr. Bush in person. "I hope he wins his election because he wants to modernize Iraq."

A photograph of the American president shaking Mr. Judi's prosthetic hand hangs on the wall of a back room at his Khademiya office. In the front room, however, are portraits of Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the vehemently anti-U.S. Iranian cleric, and his successor, Ali Khamenei, the current theocratic ruler of Iran.

 
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Condor
You are truely wasting your tome on these blithering morons! They'll vote for Kerry because he is so dumb, he makes them feel good about themselves. It's a fact! They will never believe it of themselves because they are morons and there is no link to reality. You just can't get a URL for the sunset or the sunrise, the taste of good food, the beauty of the trees as they change. If they can't cut and paste it or link to it, it just doesn't exist in their world. To work these threads, you must prepare yourself to suffer fools at least without psychosis if not lightly. The horrible thing is that there may be enough of them to elect one of their own as a President. They did it twice! We survived him and I suppose that if we must, we will survive Kerry.

Let's use me as an example. I am voting for Kerry. What do I think of him?

If you respect him enough to vote for him, you are missing something really big. If you don't respect him and are voting for him, you are a lot less intelligent than some of your posts indicate.

 
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Condor
You are truely wasting your tome on these blithering morons! They'll vote for Kerry because he is so dumb, he makes them feel good about themselves. It's a fact! They will never believe it of themselves because they are morons and there is no link to reality. You just can't get a URL for the sunset or the sunrise, the taste of good food, the beauty of the trees as they change. If they can't cut and paste it or link to it, it just doesn't exist in their world. To work these threads, you must prepare yourself to suffer fools at least without psychosis if not lightly. The horrible thing is that there may be enough of them to elect one of their own as a President. They did it twice! We survived him and I suppose that if we must, we will survive Kerry.

Let's use me as an example. I am voting for Kerry. What do I think of him?

If you respect him enough to vote for him, you are missing something really big. If you don't respect him and are voting for him, you are a lot less intelligent than some of your posts indicate.

Please enlighten me, Condor. What big thing am I missing?
 
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Condor
You are truely wasting your tome on these blithering morons! They'll vote for Kerry because he is so dumb, he makes them feel good about themselves. It's a fact! They will never believe it of themselves because they are morons and there is no link to reality. You just can't get a URL for the sunset or the sunrise, the taste of good food, the beauty of the trees as they change. If they can't cut and paste it or link to it, it just doesn't exist in their world. To work these threads, you must prepare yourself to suffer fools at least without psychosis if not lightly. The horrible thing is that there may be enough of them to elect one of their own as a President. They did it twice! We survived him and I suppose that if we must, we will survive Kerry.

Let's use me as an example. I am voting for Kerry. What do I think of him?

If you respect him enough to vote for him, you are missing something really big. If you don't respect him and are voting for him, you are a lot less intelligent than some of your posts indicate.

Please enlighten me, Condor. What big thing am I missing?

The BIG PICTURE! Whatever the F that's supposed to be. It seems to be the latest showstopper recently, an Ultimate Truth only known to Bush supporters.
 
My favorite Liberal lie is Kerry's stance on the war changing multiple times...

For the war, against the war.... flip a coin, what side is he on today?
 
Back
Top