Young Trump staffers are complaining they can't date in DC because everyone hates them

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,348
30,388
146
Feckless fucktard #1.

Good job!

damn this story is really making you mad! I see it is you once again blaming the people that don't want to sleep with you because of your Trump support and what that means, and not your own dark, hateful soul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,348
30,388
146
People hate Trump so much that even Trump supporters don’t want to date Trump supporters.

It's because of those other Trump supporters that things are so awful, you see. Not them! Their Trump support was honest and with good intentions!
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,671
136
It's really kinda tedious being right all the time. Really tedious.

Good job!

original.gif
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,470
41,988
136
They are getting an abstinence only education :)

Is it still abstinence if they are fucking themselves? Working for this mentally ill traitor is going to be like an incurable STD for their resumes.

Fox or a "think tank" only territory. And they think not getting a date is depressing, ha!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Is it still abstinence if they are fucking themselves? Working for this mentally ill traitor is going to be like an incurable STD for their resumes.

Fox or a "think tank" only territory. And they think not getting a date is depressing, ha!

Depends on their ambitions and their path, they're likely just following advice from people who have had a positive experience. I would be far more worried about my future career instead of dating aspirations if I were them. And is it too late to make a break now? Probably in DC it is.
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Because a lot of them want a staffing position at the White House, the man in charge didn't matter.

When I joined the Army I didn't let the Commander in Chief affect my decision.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Because a lot of them want a staffing position at the White House, the man in charge didn't matter.

When I joined the Army I didn't let the Commander in Chief affect my decision.
Ok, you made good points ans convinced me to limit this to political appointees, not career public servants.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,742
9,010
146
Because a lot of them want a staffing position at the White House, the man in charge didn't matter.

When I joined the Army I didn't let the Commander in Chief affect my decision.
Yup some people work their entire lives to that goal. How do you get there finally and just walk away from it. You get one shot. You bail and that’s it. Besides these guys aren’t setting policy. They are day to day grunts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TallBill

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Ok, you made good points ans convinced me to limit this to political appointees, not career public servants.

That makes sense.

Yup some people work their entire lives to that goal. How do you get there finally and just walk away from it. You get one shot. You bail and that’s it. Besides these guys aren’t setting policy. They are day to day grunts.

Precisely what I was thinking. Shitty situation either way, shitting on them more is unnecessary.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,470
41,988
136

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,671
136
Because a lot of them want a staffing position at the White House, the man in charge didn't matter.

When I joined the Army I didn't let the Commander in Chief affect my decision.

If the man in charge doesn't matter especially this man that's even worse.
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
If the man in charge doesn't matter especially this man that's even worse.

That makes no sense. Serving your country under someone that you don't like is even tougher that serving under someone that you do.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,579
17,065
136
Yup some people work their entire lives to that goal. How do you get there finally and just walk away from it. You get one shot. You bail and that’s it. Besides these guys aren’t setting policy. They are day to day grunts.

App based dating was not an option last time I was single. I’d bet you could write some kind of blurb describing you support this or that...
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Plenty of fish in the sea. Why take a chance on a Trumpist?

Blessing in disguise. Someone who would turn down a potential romantic partner based strictly on politics is probably someone who wouldn't be compatible anyway so it's better than wasting anyone's time and that's true no matter what President you were working for.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,470
41,988
136
Blessing in disguise. Someone who would turn down a potential romantic partner based strictly on politics is probably someone who wouldn't be compatible anyway so it's better than wasting anyone's time and that's true no matter what President you were working for.

Def a blessing, but you're wrong as this it isn't "strictly politics." We're talking about a metric that directly relates to a person's integrity, honesty, empathy and compassion. You know, traits that are normally sought out for a partner. Those being in short supply within the White House is the problem, not people having perfectly reasonable standards in their romantic lives.

I've never heard of this happening with other administrations btw. I do find it funny to hear those on the religious right act offended by this though, the same crowd who often require partners change religions in order to get married, or are prevented from dating outside their faith or ethnicity outright.

Time to find another bullshit issue to be indignant about I guess.