Cuda1447
Lifer
I understand the death of 20 children and 6 school officials is incredibly sad. Especially since it hits closer to home, happening in the US. I understand its the 2nd biggest school shooting in US history. I understand it resonates more with parents etc...
What I don't understand is why there is such outcry for THIS ONE EVENT. I do. But the difference in outcries amongst events is very aggravating, let me explain.
Hundreds of 'events' happen every year, which are incredibly sad. School shootings, brutal murders, genocides, kidnappings, gang violence, drug war violence, natural disasters etc etc..
So why is it that people want to show their 'sadness' for specific events, while ignoring most of the others. I'm sure many of you (who have facebook) have seen the gluttony of posts reading "My heart is broken for those children" "I'm sad everytime I think about it" "I can't stop crying" and "I can barely sleep at night". Certainly, most of these emotions are exaggerated, if not outright lies. I don't doubt many people cried about what happened. But are they legitimately 'sad' or are they just trying to show they are 'emotional' and 'caring' for their own selfish image.
I see more outrage and sadness for this then I did the Tsunami in India that killed 200,000 people, including children. More outrage than the Tsunami/Earthquake/Nuclear Disaster in Japan. More outrage than the Genocides in Africa, the car bombings in Egypt/Israel/elsewhere.
Is it because its an American disaster? Perhaps.
But what about the gang violence that claims innocent lives. Or the rougher areas of the US where murder/crime is more common.
Honestly, this is why people care... and it makes me fucking sick. They only care because the media cares. Whatever stories the media hammers to death, your average US citizen is going to latch onto and tie their emotional sensitivity to. It's a fucking sham. If you're going to 'care' than care about ALL of the events that are tragic, don't just pick and choose you fucking posers.
I obviously realize voicing this opinion is going to be very touchy, but I can't imagine others here don't see this shit and agree?
Thoughts?
What I don't understand is why there is such outcry for THIS ONE EVENT. I do. But the difference in outcries amongst events is very aggravating, let me explain.
Hundreds of 'events' happen every year, which are incredibly sad. School shootings, brutal murders, genocides, kidnappings, gang violence, drug war violence, natural disasters etc etc..
So why is it that people want to show their 'sadness' for specific events, while ignoring most of the others. I'm sure many of you (who have facebook) have seen the gluttony of posts reading "My heart is broken for those children" "I'm sad everytime I think about it" "I can't stop crying" and "I can barely sleep at night". Certainly, most of these emotions are exaggerated, if not outright lies. I don't doubt many people cried about what happened. But are they legitimately 'sad' or are they just trying to show they are 'emotional' and 'caring' for their own selfish image.
I see more outrage and sadness for this then I did the Tsunami in India that killed 200,000 people, including children. More outrage than the Tsunami/Earthquake/Nuclear Disaster in Japan. More outrage than the Genocides in Africa, the car bombings in Egypt/Israel/elsewhere.
Is it because its an American disaster? Perhaps.
But what about the gang violence that claims innocent lives. Or the rougher areas of the US where murder/crime is more common.
Honestly, this is why people care... and it makes me fucking sick. They only care because the media cares. Whatever stories the media hammers to death, your average US citizen is going to latch onto and tie their emotional sensitivity to. It's a fucking sham. If you're going to 'care' than care about ALL of the events that are tragic, don't just pick and choose you fucking posers.
I obviously realize voicing this opinion is going to be very touchy, but I can't imagine others here don't see this shit and agree?
Thoughts?