<< . It have a hard time reading or listenting to what I consider unjustified arrogance >>
I have not stated that I am a senior in engineering and such because of "arrogance". I'm not one to brag, as hard as that may be for you to believe (if you would ask any of my friends, that would confirm that). However, when people post absolutely false things about me (as you and fdiskboy) have done, I feel obligated to defend myself against such unjustified lies. From a few posts, you have been able to somehow determine that I am a joke, emotionally insecure, and pathetic. Whatever sort of psychiatric training you have is amazingly effective, given that you are able to so accuately conclude so many things about me in such a short time (ahem).
<< Now if you continue to dismiss my own arguments as unclear simply because you don't understand them >>
I understand things much better when they are stated clearly and not mixed in with lies about me. Now that you have resolved to keep your arguments on a scientific level, such misunderstandings hopefully will not occur. My intention was not to "dismiss" your arguments, merely to attempt to clarify what you meant, and perhaps discuss them further. However, you appeared to be more interested in a "fvck you, idiot" discussion than a reasonable, logical, scientific discussion.
<< Quite a few of my professors and colleagues understood them, and I'm sure their academic profile would compare favorably with yours (as incredible as that may be to believe). >>
You apologize for insulting me in one line, and a few sentences later you do it again. Pick a side- are you going to be a rational, logical person, or an asshole? The choice is yours. It's hard to give any weight to a person's points when their arguments are mixed in with insults and lies about others.