Yonah sossaman Cinebench 2003 bench marks

[Hacp]

Lol that one german site is causing alot of havok and speculation. The numbers are pretty good, but its ONE benchmark. We just don't know yet.

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Intelia
As already stated we know for fact sassaman was running DDR2 400 on a 600FSB so with DDR2 667 on a 667FSB Dp and DC on the same card should make for a hugh differance in performance . Also said because of the* behind the 2ghz sassaman and yonah that shows those 2 DC to be running lineari . so the 1.5 ghz sossaman and yonah were running asyn. So I assumed (no way of knowing ) that the yonah was also running @ 600 FSB with DDR@ 400 memory. the evidence is there for me to make such a statement. Were as All you guys are doing is ranting and raving .

Where is your "evidence" of these FSB and RAM speeds?

CPU-Z regularly reports crap for new CPUs. Yonah, Merom, Sossaman, all engineering samples for which CPU-Z can't correctly detect and report data.

IF Intel wanted to demonstrate the best performance possible (which makes sense) don't you think they'd use DDR2-667 which is widely available and actually priced fairly reasonably RIGHT NOW? Why would they cripple it?

At any rate you've proven yourself (admittedly so) to be a little troll who has some secret agenda to Intel-ize everyone here. Unfortunately for you, it isn't (and won't) work.

 

[Hacp]

I would think that the would want to use the most expensive DDR2 memory modules at the higheset frequencies and lowest timings availible. Then let CPU-Z fake it by only showing DDR2-400 🙂.

 

[Dadofamunky]

Yet another stupid post by Intelia.

How pathetic do you have to be to name yourself after a monster multinational corporation?

Your original link is a German regurg of the same Intel marketing crap. Stop spamming this forum! You have no insight and no information to offer. If you did my reception to you would be very different.

As it is, I'm going to ask the hosts to ban you.

 

[CheesePoofs]

Originally posted by: Dadofamunky
Yet another stupid post by Intelia.

How pathetic do you have to be to name yourself after a monster multinational corporation?

Your original link is a German regurg of the same Intel marketing crap. Stop spamming this forum! You have no insight and no information to offer. If you did my reception to you would be very different.

As it is, I'm going to ask the hosts to ban you.

There's already a thread going in Forum Issues to ban intelia. Join in!!

 

[Velk]

Here are some benchmark results showing intel's unreleased next generation server chip being crushed by an AMD budget desktop dual core.

Now if they gain some efficiencies and tweak some stuff, add some voltage, fiddle some dials and pull a large performance boost out of their... hats before retail they might even beat the budget dual core.

AMD is dooooooooooomed ! Sell shares now !

8)

 

[RoosterKooster]

Is Cinebench 2003 (32 bit) compiled with Inhell's compiler that purposely ignores AMD's optimizing instructions so as to create the illusion of Inhell's cpu's?

What current benchmarks are known to be voided by using Intel's compiler?

 

[Alaa]

maybe she's goin to buy intel.!!!! its still not ur company.. :S

 

[Intelia]

Just learned Intel SASSAMAN to have 64Bit Tech

 

[Duvie]

That is a smart move considering most around the circles including INtel fans think that yonah not having it is a mistake.....

Please link us with that info though....or did you get it off the AT homepage again???

 

[Avalon]

Originally posted by: Intelia
Just learned Intel SASSAMAN to have 64Bit Tech

Link? Link? Empty info?

 

[Viditor]

Originally posted by: Intelia
Just learned Intel SASSAMAN to have 64Bit Tech

Wow! Considering everyone (including Intel) is saying it's 32 bit, that's some news!
Pardon my incredulity, but please prove that...