alcoholbob
Diamond Member
Far Cry 3 certainly isn't a good enough game to drop $3000 in hardware on...
Just to clarify this thread, we're talking about spending upwards of 1k+, because FC3 (A game in which someone is using tri SLI Titan to play), and Tessellation and SSAA on Metro: Last Light, aren't capable of working?
Ya'll must be serious because I'd never spend over 1000 dollars to play just two games.... Hell, not even play two games, but two enable one or two more settings on two games. Especially when new consoles are coming out and developers will most likely start to really push the graphics envelope and NV/AMD will, instead of releasing refreshes, actually release brand new architectures.
But I guess some of you guys have a lot more money to spend on gaming and put it at a lot higher of a priority than I do. To me though, what you listed, couldn't possibly warrant that type of expenditure for such a small increase in performance. I'd wait for new architectures that are a year away rather than spend 1k+ on GFX cards that will no doubt look terrible compared to what comes around in 2014.
Then again, it probably would have helped if you'd answered/specfied what resolution was your target/bear minimum, to play at....
I have tested the crap out of this game and that has never been the case.I always got much better fps (on AMD) by playing at DX10 rather than DX11.
well even some reviews have mentioned that the game itself is wonky no matter what.Far Cry 3 runs great for me. 60 buttery smooth frames per second.