• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Rant Yes, Chili does has beans.

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
but I believe rice and beans (complementary near perfect protein, btw) to be a long standing staple in basic Mexican cuisine.
chili isn't mexican. it's tex mex. the only dish in mexico that is similar (afaik) is mole, which is far more complex. i could be convinced that chili is a pobre copy of mole, like jambalaya is a pobre copy of paella. but the known history is that chili is from san antonio, was originally used as a sauce for other food (enchiladas) and was then served on its own. you wouldn't put large chunky beans in it if you were using it as a sauce for other foods. again, there's attestations to "chili and beans" which tells you beans were not considered part of the dish.

Now, I think, even that may have gone away.
yup, it's gone. for a while they sold it in grocery stores, but not sure even that's around anymore. it was much better on the chicken items than the regular red sauces were.

adding a can of drained green beans to my chili
LitzttI.gif
 
Last edited:
chili isn't mexican. it's tex mex. the only dish in mexico that is similar (afaik) is mole, which is far more complex. i could be convinced that chili is a pobre copy of mole, like jambalaya is a pobre copy of paella. but the known history is that chili is from san antonio, was originally used as a sauce for other food (enchiladas) and was then served on its own. you wouldn't put large chunky beans in it if you were using it as a sauce for other foods. again, there's attestations to "chili and beans" which tells you beans were not considered part of the dish.
I beg to differ but Chili arose all over Texas not just San Antonio.🙄 And yes the dish itself always had beans in it.🙄
 
Wendy's chili is the best.

<giggles and tiptoes away>

Ok, I admit I liked Wendy's chili when I ate meat. I would to order it with a baked potato, side salad and jr. cheeseburger deluxe when they cost a buck a piece.
 
Wendy's chili is the best.

<giggles and tiptoes away>

Ok, I admit I liked Wendy's chili when I ate meat. I would to order it with a baked potato, side salad and jr. cheeseburger deluxe when they cost a buck a piece.
Why in Hell don't you eat meat? The eating of flesh of other animals is what helped us become Humans in the first place.
 
I'm of the opinion that tomatoes either fresh, canned or paste doesn't even belong in chili at all...

That's how they make that abomination that gets served on spaghetti. No beans, no tomatoes, no heat...
Its chilli for people who are allergic to flavour.
 
Agreed, and thank you for pointing this out, as you have far more (well earned) culinary cred here than I. "Heat" suffers from BS macho, to a ridiculous degree. I always want heat plus flavor.

Bit of the opposite for me. The hotter species of peppers tend to have MUCH better flavor, without the bitter notes that you find in most annuum species.

It's all a matter of what you're used to. I've grown various chinense for decades and the heat doesn't bother me, so I can use enough of them to get their superior flavor.

Granted, if making chilil for people who aren't used to hot food, I'll end up making it mild then adding a homemade pepper paste to mine, but I'd prefer not putting chili powder in at all to avoid the bitterness.
 
It's funny when people try to talk about origins of chili. It's been made since before recorded history, anywhere that wild hot peppers grew during the hunting gathering era. It would be fair to assume it was more popular in hotter climates but due to the migratory patterns of birds (spreading the seeds), climates further north had opportunities too.
 
As an avid student of Chinese military history, I'm well acquainted with the exploits of Gen. Long-Pork, but, I confess, I know little to nothing personally about the history of chili.

However, the idea that campesinos in "the Mexican/Texas area" would have "cow ranches" but not beans strikes me as unlikely. Again, not an expert, but I believe rice and beans (complementary near perfect protein, btw) to be a long standing staple in basic Mexican cuisine.

Beans were plentiful (in fact, most of the world's shell-type beans originate from Mexico), but meat was such a special thing that they didn't generally mix the two.
 
Back
Top