- Jan 12, 2004
- 20,133
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: FoBoT
that doesn't make sense
"Non-radiative electromagnetic energy"
need a more technical article
Originally posted by: FoBoT
that doesn't make sense
"Non-radiative electromagnetic energy"
need a more technical article
Originally posted by: FoBoT
that doesn't make sense
"Non-radiative electromagnetic energy"
need a more technical article
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: FoBoT
that doesn't make sense
"Non-radiative electromagnetic energy"
need a more technical article
I think that's to keep it from scaring the layman (who might otherwise think you're turning the house into a giant microwave oven)
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: FoBoT
that doesn't make sense
"Non-radiative electromagnetic energy"
need a more technical article
Just nod your head and smile....
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: FoBoT
that doesn't make sense
"Non-radiative electromagnetic energy"
need a more technical article
I think that's to keep it from scaring the layman (who might otherwise think you're turning the house into a giant microwave oven)
the way the article is written, with that term used so many times, you are probably correct
but that is dumb
"It's non-radiative, but we're going to test and make sure these radiation levels are safe"There are concerns about the possible radiation effects this technology could have on people. MIT is currently conducting tests about the levels of this kind of radiation exposure to see if it is safe for humans, of which standards are controlled by the FCC. Karalis suspects the radiation levels are similar to those of an MRI and should be safe.
If the testing is successful, non-radiative wireless energy could have far-reaching possibilities, from charging our cells to powering our cars with wires underneath our streets, according to Karalis.
Originally posted by: chuckywang
This would also put a lot of electricians out of work.
And it'll create plenty of jobs.Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: chuckywang
This would also put a lot of electricians out of work.
they just need to retrain to be able to service the new equipment
not unsimilar to auto mechanics learning how to service cars with computers in them vs. the carburators and stuff
........When Nikola Tesla invented the AC (alternating current) induction motor, he had great difficulty convincing men of his time to believe in it. Thomas Edison was in favor of direct current (DC) electricity and opposed AC electricity strenuously. Tesla eventually sold his rights to his alternating current patents to George Westinghouse for $1,000,000. After paying off his investors, Tesla spent his remaining funds on his other inventions and culminated his efforts in a major breakthrough in 1899 at Colorado Springs by transmitting 100 million volts of high-frequency electric power wirelessly over a distance of 26 miles at which he lit up a bank of 200 light bulbs and ran one electric motor! With this souped up version of his Tesla coil, Tesla claimed that only 5% of the transmitted energy was lost in the process. But broke of funds again, he looked for investors to back his project of broadcasting electric power in almost unlimited amounts to any point on the globe. The method he would use to produce this wireless power was to employ the earth's own resonance with its specific vibrational frequency to conduct AC electricity via a large electric oscillator. When J.P. Morgan agreed to underwrite Tesla's project, a strange structure was begun and almost completed near Wardenclyffe in Long Island, N.Y. Looking like a huge lattice-like, wooden oil derrick with a mushroom cap, it had a total height of 200 feet. Then suddenly, Morgan withdrew his support to the project in 1906, and eventually the structure was dynamited and brought down in 1917.
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Shit, this mean we won't be able to unplug computers when they try to take over the planet.
I better get off my ass and get my SHTF bag together.
A recent report, published in November in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that the radiation from current CT-scan use ? estimated at more than 62 million CT scans per year in the U.S. (up from 3 million in 1980) ? may cause of as many as 1 in 50 future cases of cancer. It's a serious charge.
Originally posted by: Tizyler
November 22, 2006
Originally posted by: Canai
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Shit, this mean we won't be able to unplug computers when they try to take over the planet.
I better get off my ass and get my SHTF bag together.
:thumbsup:
Anybody remember an article from a couple months ago along the same lines as this one, but with 'power beams' instead, that could be directed and aimed?