• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

YASRBMAWNOTPT: GOD why did bush win?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Class1
Link me. Prove Bush lied to the American people. Prove with irrefutable evidence that he lied outright.

Where are all the weapons of mass destruction? I'm not better off now than 4 years ago and Kerry would not have been any better of a choice.

Prove that they were never there.

You see? You bone heads are so quick to blame Bush for everything before really thinking it through. Sadam's not a complete idiot; neither is Osama. You think they're just going to sit around and wait for the US to come waltzing in? :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
God you stupid dolt, don't you ever fvcking give up? Shut the fvck up. Either support your president, no matter who he is, or get the fvck out!

haha what a tard. we have the whole process of impeachment for a reason...or do you not know anything about the American Constitution?

So Impeach Bush if he's done anything wrong. Has he? No. Shut up.

Oh, and read the whole damn thread.

you should pack up all your animosity and hatred and move camp to P&N. you'll fit in nicely there.
I never said Bush is to be impeached (thats a whole another thread). You said Support your president no matter who he is. I laid out the fact that we dont have to support our president no matter who he is...hence the process of impeachment.
If we were supposed to support our leader no matter who he is, our country will be no different than Cuba or China.

support != blindly following
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Class1
Link me. Prove Bush lied to the American people. Prove with irrefutable evidence that he lied outright.

Where are all the weapons of mass destruction? I'm not better off now than 4 years ago and Kerry would not have been any better of a choice.

Prove that they were never there.

You see? You bone heads are so quick to blame Bush for everything before really thinking it through. Sadam's not a complete idiot; neither is Osama. You think they're just going to sit around and wait for the US to come waltzing in? :roll:

Why don't you prove that they were there?

But the fact is, we're both sitting behind computer monitors, and we rely on trained officials to find the weapons. Unfortunately, no trained inspector, before or after the war, found the WMDs that GWB claimed were the reason to go to war.

That's a fact.
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
God you stupid dolt, don't you ever fvcking give up? Shut the fvck up. Either support your president, no matter who he is, or get the fvck out!

haha what a tard. we have the whole process of impeachment for a reason...or do you not know anything about the American Constitution?

So Impeach Bush if he's done anything wrong. Has he? No. Shut up.

Oh, and read the whole damn thread.

you should pack up all your animosity and hatred and move camp to P&N. you'll fit in nicely there.
I never said Bush is to be impeached (thats a whole another thread). You said Support your president no matter who he is. I laid out the fact that we dont have to support our president no matter who he is...hence the process of impeachment.
If we were supposed to support our leader no matter who he is, our country will be no different than Cuba or China.

support != blindly following

according to you it is. "Either support your president, no matter who he is, or get the fvck out!" = no room for naysayers
 
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Why don't you prove that they were there?

But the fact is, we're both sitting behind computer monitors, and we rely on trained officials to find the weapons. Unfortunately, no trained inspector, before or after the war, found the WMDs that GWB claimed were the reason to go to war.

That's a fact.

Actually, Saddam was supposed to provide proof that he destroyed them, which he never did. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: yllus
This is the private domain. Your freedom of speech is defined solely to what Anand and actors on his behalf decide it is. You speech is allowed here by a courtesy of the private owners of this website. One restriction they've placed - or at least requested - is for all politics go in P&N. Quit flappin' your yaps about freedom of speech.

You totally missed the point man. The issue wasn't about being silenced on this forum (the mods can and lock anything they want and I am not going to complain). The point is that saying you have to support ouur president or leave is not the way it is. I can hate the president and still livehear as long as I want and try to work towards a different president. Thats the beauty of America. I bitch and moan because I feel like that is being taken away. And I bitch and moan because people died for my right to bitch and moan.
 
Originally posted by: SacrosanctFiend
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Why don't you prove that they were there?

But the fact is, we're both sitting behind computer monitors, and we rely on trained officials to find the weapons. Unfortunately, no trained inspector, before or after the war, found the WMDs that GWB claimed were the reason to go to war.

That's a fact.

Actually, Saddam was supposed to provide proof that he destroyed them, which he never did. 🙂

More than a dozen times. Thank you. :roll: It's about time someone had the balls to take that fvckhead out!
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: SacrosanctFiend
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Why don't you prove that they were there?

But the fact is, we're both sitting behind computer monitors, and we rely on trained officials to find the weapons. Unfortunately, no trained inspector, before or after the war, found the WMDs that GWB claimed were the reason to go to war.

That's a fact.

Actually, Saddam was supposed to provide proof that he destroyed them, which he never did. 🙂

More than a dozen times. Thank you. :roll: It's about time someone had the balls to take that fvckhead out!

Let's hope he has the balls to take out the fvckheads in Iran and North Korea too.
 
i'll respect Bush the day he has the balls to take Osama and his goonies out. Until he does, i'll respect the dirt underneath my toenails more
 
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Class1
Link me. Prove Bush lied to the American people. Prove with irrefutable evidence that he lied outright.

Where are all the weapons of mass destruction? I'm not better off now than 4 years ago and Kerry would not have been any better of a choice.

Prove that they were never there.

You see? You bone heads are so quick to blame Bush for everything before really thinking it through. Sadam's not a complete idiot; neither is Osama. You think they're just going to sit around and wait for the US to come waltzing in? :roll:

Why don't you prove that they were there?

But the fact is, we're both sitting behind computer monitors, and we rely on trained officials to find the weapons. Unfortunately, no trained inspector, before or after the war, found the WMDs that GWB claimed were the reason to go to war.

That's a fact.

Why do you presume that GWB was the only one saying there were WMD's there? And why doesn't anyone understand that Saren gas, that we found buttloads of, is almost as incredibly insanely dangerous as some ICBMs?
 
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: SacrosanctFiend
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Why don't you prove that they were there?

But the fact is, we're both sitting behind computer monitors, and we rely on trained officials to find the weapons. Unfortunately, no trained inspector, before or after the war, found the WMDs that GWB claimed were the reason to go to war.

That's a fact.

Actually, Saddam was supposed to provide proof that he destroyed them, which he never did. 🙂

More than a dozen times. Thank you. :roll: It's about time someone had the balls to take that fvckhead out!

Let's hope he has the balls to take out the fvckheads in Iran and North Korea too.

Agreed.
 
Originally posted by: Aharami
i'll respect Bush the day he has the balls to take Osama and his goonies out. Until he does, i'll respect the dirt underneath my toenails more

Yeah, like everyone's ignoring Osama :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
i'll respect Bush the day he has the balls to take Osama and his goonies out. Until he does, i'll respect the dirt underneath my toenails more

Yeah, like everyone's ignoring Osama :roll:

hi there. how was that cave you crawlwed out of. Bush HAS been ignoring Osama. Infact, Bush DID say "Im not so worried about Osama right now." Al queda should have been Bush's first and only priority. instead he shifted troops from afghanistan to iraq to go after saddam who wasnt an imminent threat like Osama IS
Bush shouldve taken Osama out...THEN worried about Saddam
 
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
i'll respect Bush the day he has the balls to take Osama and his goonies out. Until he does, i'll respect the dirt underneath my toenails more

Yeah, like everyone's ignoring Osama :roll:

hi there. how was that cave you crawlwed out of. Bush HAS been ignoring Osama. Infact, Bush DID say "Im not so worried about Osama right now." Al queda should have been Bush's first and only priority. instead he shifted troops from afghanistan to iraq to go after saddam who wasnt an imminent threat like Osama IS
Bush shouldve taken Osama out...THEN worried about Saddam

You're taking one sentence out of context. Post the entire question and/or speech and where he said it along with what the theme of the evening's event was.

He's still got troops in Afghanistan and we're still looking for Osama. Stop being such a sheep to the liberal fvcktards.
 
since you are questioning me, and you think you know better, why dont you post what Bush originally meant and his full speech?
and i never said Bush stopped looking for Osama. But the fact that he didnt make finding Osama his # 1 priority (more troops and more funding went into Iraq)...a known terrorist who caused the death of 3000+ american civilians...was a grave mistake on his part IMO.
and the funny thing is people still voted him back.

well now he is back...and lets see if he actually does anything about al queda
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Xionide
Wait osama is in Afghanistan?

I don't think so, but most of America probably thinks he is.

I dont think so either. he was last reported to be in the phillipines or something
But my point is that Bush should have kept all the heat on Osama's tail. Now the trail's gone cold and finding him is gonna be so much harder
 
Originally posted by: Aharami
since you are questioning me, and you think you know better, why dont you post what Bush originally meant and his full speech?
and i never said Bush took stopped looking for Osama. But the fact that he didnt make finding Osama his # 1 priority (more troops and more funding went into Iraq)...a known terrorist who caused the death of 3000+ american civilians...was a grave mistake on his part IMO.
and the funny thing is people still voted him back.

well now he is back...and lets see if he actually does anything about al queda

Who the hell are "his people"? The monkeys jumping around with him in the middle of the desert chanting the destruction of the US? :roll: The Afghanistan government -you know, the one that's spineless and was taking loads of money from Osama to let him be there, even though if they really wanted him out they wouldn't be able to do anything about it anyway?

You are using part of that speech as your arguement, YOU provide proof.
 
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Xionide
Wait osama is in Afghanistan?

I don't think so, but most of America probably thinks he is.

I dont think so either. he was last reported to be in the phillipines or something
But my point is that Bush should have kept all the heat on Osama's trail. Now the trail's gone cold and finding him is gonna be so much harder

The Afghanis held the entire Russian army off for TEN YEARS in that small country. We lost Osama's trail long before there were official plans to invade Iraq. Besides, that Osama bastard runs like a bitch. He could be anywhere and I haven't heard one single clue as to where he is that wasn't "um... well, we THINK he's there but we honestly have no fvcking idea what we're talking about".
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
i'll respect Bush the day he has the balls to take Osama and his goonies out. Until he does, i'll respect the dirt underneath my toenails more

Yeah, like everyone's ignoring Osama :roll:

hi there. how was that cave you crawlwed out of. Bush HAS been ignoring Osama. Infact, Bush DID say "Im not so worried about Osama right now." Al queda should have been Bush's first and only priority. instead he shifted troops from afghanistan to iraq to go after saddam who wasnt an imminent threat like Osama IS
Bush shouldve taken Osama out...THEN worried about Saddam

You're taking one sentence out of context. Post the entire question and/or speech and where he said it along with what the theme of the evening's event was.

He's still got troops in Afghanistan and we're still looking for Osama. Stop being such a sheep to the liberal fvcktards.


If he isnt there then why are we looking for him there?
 
Originally posted by: Nik
God you stupid dolt, don't you ever fvcking give up? Shut the fvck up. Either support your president, no matter who he is, or get the fvck out!

I'd most definitely get out. Bush is a POS.
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
since you are questioning me, and you think you know better, why dont you post what Bush originally meant and his full speech?
and i never said Bush took stopped looking for Osama. But the fact that he didnt make finding Osama his # 1 priority (more troops and more funding went into Iraq)...a known terrorist who caused the death of 3000+ american civilians...was a grave mistake on his part IMO.
and the funny thing is people still voted him back.

well now he is back...and lets see if he actually does anything about al queda

Who the hell are "his people"? The monkeys jumping around with him in the middle of the desert chanting the destruction of the US? :roll: The Afghanistan government -you know, the one that's spineless and was taking loads of money from Osama to let him be there, even though if they really wanted him out they wouldn't be able to do anything about it anyway?

😕 its as if....there is a point in there somewhere...but not really...

You are using part of that speech as your arguement, YOU provide proof.

I used the speech in my arguement. YOU claimed that my use of the speech was false. Burden of proof lies upon you
 
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Xionide
Wait osama is in Afghanistan?

I don't think so, but most of America probably thinks he is.

I dont think so either. he was last reported to be in the phillipines or something
But my point is that Bush should have kept all the heat on Osama's trail. Now the trail's gone cold and finding him is gonna be so much harder

The Afghanis held the entire Russian army off for TEN YEARS in that small country. We lost Osama's trail long before there were official plans to invade Iraq. Besides, that Osama bastard runs like a bitch. He could be anywhere and I haven't heard one single clue as to where he is that wasn't "um... well, we THINK he's there but we honestly have no fvcking idea what we're talking about".

Why didn't we get him while he was in teh mountains of whereverkerrysaid?
 
Back
Top